Marine Data
Type of resources
Keywords
Publication year
Scale
Topics
-
In September and October of 2011 Geoscience Australia surveyed part of the offshore northern Perth Basin in order to map potential sites of natural hydrocarbon seepage. The primary objectives of the survey were to map the spatial distribution of seepage sites and characterise the nature of the seepage at these sites (gas vs oil, macroseepage vs microseepage; palaeo vs modern day seepage) on the basis of: acoustic signatures in the water column, shallow subsurface and on the seabed; geochemical signatures in rock and sediment samples and the water column; and biological signatures on the seabed. Areas of potential natural hydrocarbon seepage that were surveyed included proven (drilled) oil and gas accumulations, a breached structure, undrilled hydrocarbon prospects, and areas with potential signatures of fluid seepage identified in seismic, satellite remote sensing and multibeam bathymetry data. Within each of these areas the survey acquired: water column measurements with the CTD; acoustic data with single- and multi-beam echosounders, sidescan sonar and sub-bottom profiler (sidescan not acquired in Area F as it was too deep in places); and sediment and biological samples with the Smith-McIntyre Grab. In addition, data were collected with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV), integrated hydrocarbon sensor array, and CO2 sensor in selected areas. Sampling with the gravity corer had limited success in many of the more shallow areas (A-E) due to the coarse sandy nature of the seabed sediments. This dataset comprises mineraology of the upper 2 cm of seabed sediment. The minerals include quartz, calcite and aragonite. Data are also provided on the mol% of Mg calcite.
-
In September and October of 2011 Geoscience Australia surveyed part of the offshore northern Perth Basin in order to map potential sites of natural hydrocarbon seepage. The primary objectives of the survey were to map the spatial distribution of seepage sites and characterise the nature of the seepage at these sites (gas vs oil, macroseepage vs microseepage; palaeo vs modern day seepage) on the basis of: acoustic signatures in the water column, shallow subsurface and on the seabed; geochemical signatures in rock and sediment samples and the water column; and biological signatures on the seabed. Areas of potential natural hydrocarbon seepage that were surveyed included proven (drilled) oil and gas accumulations, a breached structure, undrilled hydrocarbon prospects, and areas with potential signatures of fluid seepage identified in seismic, satellite remote sensing and multibeam bathymetry data. Within each of these areas the survey acquired: water column measurements with the CTD; acoustic data with single- and multi-beam echosounders, sidescan sonar and sub-bottom profiler (sidescan not acquired in Area F as it was too deep in places); and sediment and biological samples with the Smith-McIntyre Grab. In addition, data were collected with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV), integrated hydrocarbon sensor array, and CO2 sensor in selected areas. Sampling with the gravity corer had limited success in many of the more shallow areas (A-E) due to the coarse sandy nature of the seabed sediments. This dataset comprises the mineraological composition of the upper 2cm of marine sediments. The minerals include: Quartz, calcite and arogonite concentrations and magnesium calcite measured as mol%.
-
This dataset contains species identifications of small benthic worms collected during survey GA2476 (R.V. Solander, 12 August - 15 September 2008). Animals were collected from the Western Australian margin with BODO sediment grab or boxcores. Specimens were lodged at Museum of Victoria in March 2010. Species-level identifications were undertaken by Robin Wilson at the Museum of Victoria and were delivered to Geoscience Australia on the 24 October 2011. See GA Record 2009/02 for further details on survey methods and specimen acquisition. Data is presented here exactly as delivered by the taxonomist, and Geoscience Australia is unable to verify the accuracy of the taxonomic identifications.
-
The grid was created from the Australian bathymetry and topography grid (2009, version 4). The data represents the degree of aspect of a slope surface (a rectangle of 3 by 3 cells).
-
No abstract available
-
This dataset is part of AUSLIG's AMBIS 2001 product derived from the Australian Maritime Boundaries Information System (AMBIS). AMBIS 2001 data is a digital representation of the territorial sea baseline and of the outer limits of Australia's maritime zones, including the 3 nautical mile coastal waters, the 12 nautical mile territorial sea, the 24 nautical mile contiguous zone and the 200 nautical mile Australian Exclusive Economic Zone. NOTE : THERE IS NO ARCINFO DATASET STORED IN - national_data/arcinfo/culture/maratime_bnds, ONLY A SHAPEFILE HELD IN THE ARCVIEW DIRECTORY - national_data/arcview/culture/maratime_bnds The ARCINFO dataset is stored as part of the corporate data store in /d/geo/store/data/marine/boundaries/ambis2001 (This and other datasets are contained in this directory with metadata and more information).
-
This dataset contains species identifications of sponges collected during survey SOL4934 (R.V. Solander, 27 August - 24 September, 2009) and SOL5117 (R.V. Solander, 30 July - 27 August, 2010). Animals were collected from the Joseph Bonaparte Gulf with a benthic sled. Specimens were lodged at the Museum and Art Gallery of the NT (MAGNT). Species-level identifications were undertaken by Dr Belinda Alvarez de Glasby at the MAGNT and were delivered to Geoscience Australia on the 31 July 2012 . See GA Record 2011/08 and 2010/09 for further details on survey methods and specimen acquisition. Data is presented here exactly as delivered by the taxonomist, and Geoscience Australia is unable to verify the accuracy of the taxonomic identifications.
-
Geoscience Australia conducted a marine survey (GA0345/TAN1411) of the north-eastern Browse Basin (Caswell Sub-basin) between 9 October and 9 November 2014 to acquire seabed and shallow geological information to support an assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the basin. The survey, undertaken as part of the Department of Industry and Science's National CO2Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), aimed to identify and characterise indicators of natural hydrocarbon or fluid seepage that may indicate compromised seal integrity in the region. The data collected during this survey complement sequence stratigraphic studies in the Caswell Sub-basin that provide constraints on the most suitable areas for storage of CO2 and help to identify potential CO2 storage reservoirs. The results of this work are published in GA Record 2015/XX (Geocat 83120). The survey was conducted in three legs aboard the New Zealand research vessel RV Tangaroa, and included scientists and technical staff from GA, the NZ National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA) and Fugro Survey Pty Ltd. Pre-survey site selection was informed by mapping fault networks and potential fluid-flow pathways connecting the regional seal to the seabed over interpreted CO2 storage play fairways and through interpretation of associated amplitude anomalies in 2D and 3D seismic data. Shipboard data collected included multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter over 12 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1, M1) totalling 455 km2 in water depths ranging from 90 430 m, and 611 km of sub-bottom profile lines. Seabed samples were collected from 48 stations and included 104 Smith-McIntyre grabs and 41 piston cores. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) collected higher-resolution multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter data, totalling 30 km2, along with 107 line km of side scan sonar, underwater camera and sub-bottom profile data. Eighteen Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) missions collected 31 hours of underwater video, four grabs and one core. Shipboard and AUV multibeam bathymetry and sub-bottom profiler data indicated the presence of recently active faults in the area, some with significant seafloor surface expression (i.e. fault scarps with up to 40m offset). Some of these faults were visually inspected by the ROV which also confirmed the presence of diverse biological communities. Possible indications of shallow gas were observed on sub-bottom profiles, including amplitude anomalies, cross-cutting reflectors and zones of signal starvation. Water column observations including sidescan sonar, single-beam and multibeam echosounders, underwater video and photography did not conclusively identify hydrocarbon or other fluid seepage. Strong currents encountered during parts of the survey may have interfered with the direct detection of seeps in the water column. While no active signs of seepage were observed, the geochemical and biological sampling undertaken will aid in baseline environmental investigations for this region.
-
Names of Limits of International oceans and seas have been defined in 1953 by the International Hydrographic Bureau, referenced as S-23. This dataset names the areas of oceans and seas defined by the latest edition of the S-23. This edition takes into account Australia's preferred names and extents of southern ocean.
-
Geoscience Australia has been updating its collection of navigation for marine surveys in Australia. These include original navigation files, the 2003 SNIP navigation files and survey track maps along with survey acquisition reports. The result will be an updated cleansed navigation collection. The collection is based on the standard P190 extended header navigation file which follows the UKOOA standard. Industry standard metadata associated with a seismic survey is preserved. To assist industry, Geoscience Australia is making available its updated version of cleansed navigation. Although the process of updating the navigation data is ongoing and there is still legacy data to check, the navigation data is at point where a significant improvement has been achieved and it is now usable. Users should be aware that this navigation is not final and there may be errors. The KML file can be viewed using a range of applications including Google Earth, NASA WorldWind, ESRI ArcGIS Explorer, Adobe PhotoShop, AutoCAD3D or any other earth browser (geobrowser) that accepts KML formatted data. Alternatively the Shapefiles can be downloaded and viewed using any application that supports shape files.