In the 2011/12 Budget, the Australian Government announced funding of a four year National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP) to accelerate the identification and development of suitable long term CO2 storage sites, within reasonable distances of major energy and industrial emission sources. The NCIP funding follows on from funding announced earlier in 2011 from the Carbon Storage Taskforce through the National Carbon Mapping and Infrastructure Plan and previous funding recommended by the former National Low Emissions Coal Council. Four offshore sedimentary basins and several onshore basins have been identified for study and pre-competitive data acquisition.

The geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) is the process whereby CO2 captured from power plants or other industrial facilities is transported by pipeline to a suitable location and then injected under pressure into a deep geological reservoir formation, where it remains permanently trapped and prevented from entering the atmosphere. The processes by which it is retained in the subsurface are generally those that have trapped oil, gas and naturally generated CO2 for millions of years. The geological formations that can be utilised for this trapping have the same characteristics as those that are able to act as reservoir rocks for petroleum. They have good porosity and permeability and have an overlying sealing formation, which will prevent the trapped fluids migrating out of the storage reservoir and possibly escaping to the surface. In addition, because of the phase behaviour of CO2, efficient storage requires that they are stored at depths greater than 800 below the surface. Unlike oil and gas, which rely primarily on a three dimensional structural trap to prevent them from ultimately rising to the surface, there are additional trapping mechanisms for CO2. Given a sufficiently long migration path within a formation, CO2 will ultimately be rendered immobile by dissolution into the formation water, residual trapping and potentially, over longer time scales, mineralisation. As groundwaters at these depths are generally saline, this type of storage is often termed deep saline aquifer storage. A recent nationwide review by Commonwealth and State geological surveys, as part of the Carbon Storage Taskforce, rated the suitability of geological basins across Australia for geological storage of CO2. The most geologically suitable basins are the offshore Gippsland and North Perth basins but several onshore basins also rate highly. These include the Eromanga, Cooper, Bowen, Galilee, Surat, Canning and Otway basins. The Victorian Government has recently released area for greenhouse gas storage exploration in the Gippsland Basin and the Queensland Government in the Galilee and Surat basins. The aquifers within these basins provide groundwater for human consumption, agriculture, mining, recreation and groundwater dependent ecosystems. The Surat Basin also contains oil and gas accumulations that are being exploited by the onshore petroleum industry. Understanding the existing the groundwater's chemistry and the connectivity between aquifers in the context of its current use is essential in order to determine whether prospective aquifers could be used for geological storage of CO2 without compromising other activities. The potential risks to groundwater from the potential migration of CO2 and changes to groundwater properties that might be expected will also be discussed. Current data gaps include poor hydrogeochemical data coverage for the deeper aquifers and particularly limited data on trace metals and organics. A comparison with experiences learned from enhanced oil recovery using CO2 in North America and the CO2CRC's pilot CO2 injection project in Western Victoria will illustrate some of the unique differences and opportunities for geological storage of CO2 in Australia. Oral presentation at "Groundwater 2010" conference, 31 October - 4th November 2010, Canberra

The first large-scale projects for geological storage of carbon dioxide on the Australian mainland are likely to occur within sedimentary sequences that underlie or are within the Triassic-Cretaceous, Great Artesian Basin (GAB) aquifer sequence. Recent national1 and state2 assessments have concluded that certain deep formations within the GAB show considerable geological suitability for the storage of greenhouse gases. These same formations contain trapped methane and naturally generated CO2 stored for millions of years. In July 2010, the Queensland government released exploration permits for Greenhouse Gas Storage in the Surat and Galilee basins.An important consideration in assessing the potential economic, environmental, health and safety risks of such projects is the potential impact CO2 migrating out of storage reservoirs could have on overlying groundwater resources. The risk and impact of CO2 migrating from a greenhouse gas storage reservoir into groundwater cannot be objectively assessed without knowledge of the natural baseline characteristics of the groundwater within these systems. Due to the phase behaviour of CO2, geological storage of carbon dioxide in the supercritical state requires depths greater than 800m, but there are few hydrogeochemical studies of these deeper aquifers in the prospective storage areas. Historical hydrogeochemical data are compiled from various State and Federal Government agencies. In addition, hydrogeochemical information is compiled from thousands of petroleum well completion reports in order to obtain more information on the deeper aquifers, not typically used for agriculture or human consumption. The data are passed through a QC procedure to check for mud contamination and to ascertain whether a representative sample had been collected. The large majority of the samples proved to be contaminated but a small selection passed the QC criteria. The full dataset is available for download from GA's Virtual Dataroom. Oral presentation at "Groundwater 2010" Conference, 31 October - 4 November 2010, Canberra

The CO2CRC Otway Project in southwestern Victoria, Australia has injected over 17 months 65 445 tonnes of a mixed carbon dioxide-methane fluid into the water leg of a depleted natural gas reservoir at a depth of approximately 2km. Pressurized sub-surface fluids were collected from the Naylor-1 observation well using a tri-level U-tube sampling system located near the crest of the fault-bounded anticline trap, 300 metres up-dip of the CRC-1 gas injection well. Relative to the pre-injection gas-water contact (GWC), only the shallowest U-tube initially accessed the residual methane gas cap. The pre-injection gas cap at Naylor-1 contains CO₂ at 1.5 mol% compared to 75.4 mol% for the injected gas from the Buttress-1 supply well and its CO₂ is depleted in ¹³C by 4.5%₀ VPDB compared to the injected supercritical CO<Sub>2</sub>. Additional assurance of the arrival of injected gas at the observation well is provided by the use of the added tracer compounds, CD₄, Kr and SF₆ in the injected gas stream. Lessons learnt from the CO2CRC Otway Project have enabled us to better anticipate the challenges for rapid deployment of carbon dioxide in a commercial environment at much larger scales.

Initial 2D seismic survey using mini-vibroseis with high frequency band 10 - 150Hz. This seismic survey is part of the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) projects.

This publication is the successor to Oil and Gas Resources of Australia 2001 and continues as the definitive reference on exploration, development and production of Australia's petroleum resources. OGRA 2002 provides the background for much of the advice on petroleum resources given to the Australian Government.

In mid 2011 the Australian Government announced funding of a new four year National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP) to accelerate the identification and development of sites suitable for the long term storage of CO2 in Australia that are within reasonable distances of major energy and industrial CO2 emission sources. The NCIP program promotes pre-competitive storage exploration and provides a basis for the development of transport and storage infrastructure. The Plan follows on from recommendations from the Carbon Storage Taskforce and the National CCS Council (formerly, the National Low Emissions Coal Council). It builds on the work funded under the National Low Emissions Coal Initiative and the need for adequate storage to be identified as a national priority. Geoscience Australia is providing strategic advice in delivering the plan and will lead in the acquisition of pre-competitive data. Four offshore sedimentary basins (Bonaparte, Browse, Perth and Gippsland basins) and several onshore basins have been identified for pre-competitive data acquisition and study. The offshore Petrel Sub-basin is located in Bonaparte Basin, in NW Australia, has been identified as a potential carbon storage hub for CO2 produced as a by-product from future LNG processing associated with the development of major gas accumulations on the NW Shelf. The aim of the project is to determine if the sub-basin is suitable for long-term storage, and has the potential capacity to be a major storage site. The project began in June 2011 and will be completed by July 2013. As part of the project, new 2D seismic data will be acquired in an area of poor existing seismic coverage along the boundary of the two Greenhouse Gas Assessment Areas, which were released in 2009.

Accurate seismic velocity model is essential for depth conversion and rock property determination in the context of fluid flow modelling to support site selection for secure storage of carbon dioxide. The Bonaparte CO2 Storage project funded by the Australian Government will assess the carbon dioxide geological storage potential of two blocks in the Petrel Sub-basin on the Australian NW Margin. These blocks were offered as part of the 2009 release of offshore areas for greenhouse gas (GHG) storage assessment. The Petrel Sub-basin is a northwest-trending Paleozoic rift within the southern Bonaparte Basin. The geological reservoirs of interest include the Jurassic Plover Formation and the Early Cretaceous Sandpiper Sandstone. Primary and secondary seals of interest include the Late Jurassic Frigate Formation and the Cretaceous Bathurst Island Group (regional seal). Trapping mechanisms for injected CO2 may include faulted anticlines, stratigraphic traps, salt diapirs and/or migration dissolution and residual trapping. Water depths are generally less than 100m and depths to reservoir/seal pairs range between 800-2500m below the sea surface. All three main types of seismic velocity measurements are available within the area of our study: velocities derived from stacking of multi-channel reflection seismic data; velocities determined in the process of ray tracing modelling of large offset refraction data acquired by the ocean bottom seismographs (OBS) along the coincident reflection/refraction transect, and velocities from well log (sonic, vertical seismic profiling and check shot) measurements.

The Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (CO2CRC) Otway Project in the onshore Otway Basin, Victoria, is Australia's first pilot project for the long term sequestration of CO2. The Otway Project has injected 65,445 tonnes of a mixed CO2-CH4 supercritical fluid (77 mol% CO2, 20 mol% CH4, 3 mol% of minor wet gases and N2) some 2000 m below the surface into the Waarre Formation, which is capped by the Belfast Mudstone regional seal. The site has been comprehensively characterised by a multidisciplinary team and the risk analysis has shown the likelihood of leakage out of the injection horizon, let alone to the land surface, to be exceedingly low. Nevertheless, the objectives of the CO2CRC through the Otway Project are not only to demonstrate safe CO2 injection, but also to develop new methodologies for monitoring and verification (M&V) of carbon storage that might apply to future commercial scale injection. At Otway, this involves M&V at the reservoir level and Assurance Monitoring, in the shallow subsurface (aquifers and soils) and the atmosphere. The groundwater monitoring system represents the most comprehensive system for monitoring freshwater in the vicinity of a CO2 storage demonstration to date. Monitoring the groundwater is of particular significance in demonstrating the ongoing integrity of natural resources to the general community.

The economics of the storage of CO2 in underground reservoirs in Australia have been analysed as part of the Australian Petroleum Cooperative Research Centre's GEODISC program. The analyses are based on cost estimates generated by a CO2 storage technical / economic model developed at the beginning of the GEODISC project. They also rely on data concerning the characteristics of geological reservoirs in Australia. The uncertainties involved in estimating the costs of such projects are discussed and the economics of storing CO2 for a range of CO2 sources and potential storage sites across Australia are presented. The key elements of the CO2 storage process and the methods involved in estimating the costs of CO2 storage are described and the CO2 storage costs for a hypothetical but representative storage project in Australia are derived. The effects of uncertainties inherent in estimating the costs of storing CO2 are shown. The analyses show that the costs are particularly sensitive to parameters such as the CO2 flow rate, the distance between the source and the storage site, the physical properties of the reservoir and the market prices of equipment and services. Therefore, variations in any one of these inputs can lead to significant variation in the costs of CO2 storage. Allowing for reasonable variations in all the inputs together in a Monte Carlo simulation of any particular site, then a large range of total CO2 storage costs is possible. The effect of uncertainty for the hypothetical representative storage site is illustrated. The impact of storing other gases together with CO2 is analysed. The other gases include methane, hydrogen sulphide, nitrogen, nitrous oxides and oxides of sulphur, all of which potentially could be captured together with CO2. The effect on storage costs when varying quantities of other gases are injected with the CO2 is shown. Based on the CO2 storage estimates and the published costs capturing CO2 from industrial processes, the econ