The effective management of Darwin Harbour in Northern Australia is dependent upon accurate spatial information of seabed habitats that is required by multiple stakeholders. To develop this information, a combination of spatially continuous multibeam data, and targeted video and sediment data were used to classify the seabed and generate habitat maps. These data were acquired during collaborative surveys between Geoscience Australia, the Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management (DLRM), the Australian Institute of Marine Science and the Darwin Port Corporation. A seascape analysis was used to classify the seabed, incorporating information from multibeam data and underwater video characterisations. We used the Iterative Self Organising Unsupervised Classification technique to combine the information from five variables to form a single classification showing potentially different seabed habitats. The 'probability of hard seabed' (p-rock) variable was derived by comparing the angular backscatter response of known areas of hard seabed to all other angular backscatter responses. We found that six habitat classes were statistically optimal and related to a unique combination of seabed substrate, relief, bedform, presence of a sediment veneer and presence of epibenthic biota and rock/reef. This presentation focuses on methods used to produce a continuous map of the harbour showing the distribution of multiple habitat types. We demonstrate the value of acoustic data for the characterisation of the seabed substrate. The resultant maps are being used by the Northern Territory DLRM to inform ongoing management of Darwin Harbour, with additional mapping planned for offshore areas and adjacent harbours in the region.

<p>This resource contains multibeam sonar backscatter data for Outer Darwin Harbour collected by Geoscience Australia (GA), the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) and the Northern Territory Government (Department of Land Resource Management) during the period from 28 May and 23 June 2015 on the RV Solander (survey SOL6187/GA0351). This project was made possible through offset funds provided by INPEX-led Ichthys LNG Project to Northern Territory Government Department of Land Resource Management, and co-investment from Geoscience Australia and Australian Institute of Marine Science. The intent of this four year (2014-2018) program is to improve knowledge of the marine environments in the Darwin and Bynoe Harbour regions by collating and collecting baseline data that enable the creation of thematic habitat maps that underpin marine resource management decisions. The specific objectives of the survey were to: <p>1. Obtain high resolution geophysical (bathymetry) data for outer Darwin Harbour, including Shoal Bay; <p>2. Characterise substrates (acoustic backscatter properties, grainsize, sediment chemistry) for outer Darwin Harbour, including Shoal Bay; and <p>3. Collect tidal data for the survey area. Data acquired during the survey included: multibeam sonar bathymetry and acoustic backscatter; physical samples of seabed sediments, underwater photography and video of grab sample locations and oceanographic information including tidal data and sound velocity profiles. This dataset comprises multibeam backscatter data. <p>A detailed account of the survey is provided in: <p>Siwabessy, P.J.W., Smit, N., Atkinson, I., Dando, N., Harries, S., Howard, F.J.F., Li, J., Nicholas, W.A., Potter, A., Radke, L.C., Tran, M., Williams, D. and Whiteway, T., 2015. Outer Darwin Harbour Marine Survey 2015: GA0351/SOL6187 Post-survey report. Record 2016/008. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/Record.2016.008

This resource includes multibeam sonar backscatter data for Beagle Marine Park (Bass Strait) collected by Geoscience Australia (GA) and the Institute for Marine & Antarctic Studies (University of Tasmania; UTAS) during the period 17 – 26 June 2018 on the RV Bluefin. The survey was undertaken as a collaborative project funded through the National Environmental Science Program Marine Biodiversity Hub, with co-investment by GA and UTAS. The purpose of the project was to build baseline information for benthic habitats in the Beagle Marine Park that will support ongoing environmental monitoring within the South-east Marine Park Network as part of the 10-year management plan (2013-2023). Data acquisition for the project was completed during three separate voyages: Phase 1 - Seabed mapping by multibeam sonar; Phase 2 – Seabed imagery acquisition by Autonomous Underwater Vehicle, and sediment sampling; Phase 3 – Survey of demersal fish communities using Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUVs). This dataset from Phase 1 comprises 11 backscatter grids derived from multibeam sonar data gridded at 1 m spatial resolution, covering a combined area of 364 km2. A detailed report on the survey is provided in: Falster, G., Monk, J., Carroll, A., Siwabessy, J., Deane, A., Picard, K., Dando, N., Hulls, J., Nichol, S., Barrett, N. 2019. Australian Marine Park Baseline and Monitoring Survey: Post Survey Report, Beagle Marine Park, South-east Marine Park Network. Report to the National Environmental Science Program, Marine Biodiversity Hub.

A seabed mapping survey over a series of carbonate banks, intervening channels and surrounding sediment plains on the Van Diemen Rise in the eastern Joseph Bonaparte Gulf was completed under a Memorandum of Understanding between Geoscience Australia and the Australian Institute of Marine Sciences. The survey obtained detailed geological (sedimentological, geochemical, geophysical) and biological data (macro-benthic and infaunal diversity, community structure) for the banks, channels and plains to establish the late-Quaternary evolution of the region and investigate relationships between the physical environment and associated biota for biodiversity prediction. The survey also permits the biodiversity of benthos of the Van Diemen Rise to be put into a biogeographic context of the Arafura-Timor Sea and wider northern Australian marine region. Four study areas were investigated across the outer to inner shelf. Multibeam sonar data provide 100 per cent coverage of the seabed for each study area and are supplemented with geological and biological samples collected from 63 stations. In a novel approach, geochemical data collected at the stations provide an assessment of sediment and water quality for surrogacy research. Oceanographic data collected at four stations on the Van Diemen Rise will provide an understanding of the wave, tide and ocean currents as well as insights into sediment transport. A total of 1,154 square kilometres of multibeam sonar data and 340 line-km of shallow (<100 mbsf) sub-bottom profiles were collected.

Geoscience Australia carried out a marine survey on Lord Howe Island shelf (NSW) in 2008 (SS062008) to map seabed bathymetry and characterise benthic environments through colocated sampling of surface sediments and infauna, rock coring, observation of benthic habitats using underwater towed video, and measurement of ocean tides and wavegenerated currents. Subbottom profile data was also collected to map sediment thickness and shelf stratigraphy. Data and samples were acquired using the National Facility Research Vessel Southern Surveyor. Bathymetric data from this survey was merged with other preexisting bathymetric data (including LADS) to generate a grid covering 1034 sq km. As part of a separate Geoscience Australia survey in 2007 (TAN0713), an oceanographic mooring was deployed on the northern edge of Lord Howe Island shelf. The mooring was recovered during the 2008 survey following a 6 month deployment. lh_back_8m is a backscatter grid of the Lord Howe survey area produced from the processed EM300 backscatter data of the survey area using the CMST-GA MB Process.

Acoustic remote sensing is the only effective technique to investigate deep sea bottom. Modern high-frequency multibeam echosounders transmit and receive backscatter signals from hundreds of narrow-angle beams which enlighten small footprints on the seabed. They can produce bathymetry and backscatter data with a spatial resolution around 2% of water depth, which enables us to map the seabed with great detail and accuracy. After calibration, the backscatter intensity is largely controlled by three seabed physical properties: the acoustic impedance contrast (often called hardness), apparent interface roughness (relative to acoustic frequency) and volume inhomogeneity [3, 4, 7]. These seabed physical properties are directly related to sediment grain size characteristics at the sedimentary areas. Studies showed that backscatter intensity had a moderate and positive correlation with sediment mean grain size [1, 3, 6]. Also, backscatter intensity was found to be positively correlated with coarse fractions and inversely correlated with finer fractions [2, 5, 6]. Other sediment grain size properties, especially sorting may also play important roles in the backscatter-sediment relationship [3, 5, 6]. The backscatter-sediment relationship, however, is complex in nature. Research is needed to better understand how acoustic sound interacts with sediment. This study aims to explore this relationship using a set of high quality sediment and multibeam backscatter data, and a robust spatial modelling technique. The co-located sediment and multibeam data were collected from four different areas of Australian margin which represent different sedimentary environments. Five hundred sixty-four sediment grab samples were taken from these survey areas. They were analysed in laboratory using the same procedure to generate grain size properties of %gravel, %sand, %mud, mean grain size, sorting, skewness and kurtosis. The multibeam data were collected using Kongsberg's 300 kHz EM3002 system. The raw multibeam backscatter was processed using the CMST-GA MB Process v8.11.02.1 software developed by Geoscience Australia and the Centre for Marine Science and Technology at Curtin University of Technology. As a result, the backscatter mosaics from incidence angles of 1o to 60o, at an interval of 1o, were generated. The backscatter intensity values from these 60 incidence angles were extracted for all of the sediment samples. The machine learning model Random Forest Decision Tree (RFDT) was used to investigate the backscatter-sediment relationship. The seven sediment grain size properties were the explanatory variables. The response variable was the backscatter intensity from each incidence angle. The model performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. For incidence angles between 1o and 42o, the RFDT models achieved fairly good performance, with a percentage of variance explained around 70% (Figure 1). The model performance gradually decreased for the outer beam range (incidence angle > 42o). Mud content was consistently identified as the most important explanatory variable to the backscatter strength. The second most important explanatory was usually sediment mean grain size. The RFDT models were also able to generate predicted response curves to quantitatively investigate the relationships between the important explanatory variables and individual response variables. The predicted relationship between %mud and the acoustic backscatter intensity is shown in Figure 2. This indicates a negative but non-linear relationship, with the increase of mud content in the sediment, the backscatter intensity decreases. This finding is consistent with that of previous studies [2, 5, 6]. Fine sediment with high mud content not only is soft (e.g., low impedence contrast) but also has high acoustic penetration (e.g., high attenudation in sediment), which naturally incurs low backcatter return

Darwin Harbour is the primary sea port for northern Australia, for which accurate information on the seabed is critical and required by multiple stakeholders. These stakeholders include the offshore energy industry, the fishing industry, and government authorities responsible for managing the harbour, in particular, the Port Authority. Darwin harbour is macrotidal with large areas of shallow (<10 m) subtidal and intertidal flats, dissected by bifurcating channels with localised areas of hardground. These hardground areas provide substrate for epibenthic communities. To support the informed management of Darwin Harbour, Geoscience Australia (GA), in collaboration with the Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management (DLRM), the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) and the Darwin Port Corporation, conducted a multibeam survey of the harbour in 2011 on board MV Matthew Flinders. This was followed in 2013 by a physical sampling (sediments and video) survey by GA in collaboration with DLRM on board MV John Hickman. This paper presents results from those surveys with a focus on techniques used to produce a spatially continuous map of the harbour floor showing the distribution of hard and soft substrate types. The Darwin Harbour surveys acquired multibeam sonar data (bathymetry and backscatter) across 180 km2 gridded to 1 m resolution, 61 seabed samples and 35 underwater video observations to map and classify the seabed into habitats. Primary geomorphic features identified in Darwin Harbour include channels, banks, ridges, plains and scarps. Within the study area, acoustically hard substrates are associated with hard ground and relatively coarse seabed sediments. The hard grounds (rock, reef and coral gardens) are found mostly on banks and often overlain by a veneer of sandy sediment. In contrast, acoustically soft substrates are associated with fine sediments (mud and fine sand) that form the plains and channels. A seascape analysis was used to classify the seabed, incorporating information from multibeam data, underwater video characterisations and seabed hardness predictions. We used the Iterative Self Organising (ISO) Unsupervised Classification technique to combine the information from five variables (bathymetry, slope, rugosity, backscatter and probability of hard seabed (p-rock)) to form a single seabed habitat classification. The p-rock variable was derived by comparing the angular backscatter response of known areas of hard seabed to all other angular backscatter responses. We found that six habitat classes were statistically optimal based on the distance ratio measure. These six classes are related to a unique combination of seabed substrate, relief, bedform, presence of a sediment veneer and presence of epibenthic biota and rock/reef (hard substrate). The results presented here demonstrate the value of acoustic data for the characterisation of the seabed substrate that provides key habitats for benthic biota. This study also highlights the utility of the p-rock variable for habitat mapping at the level of distinguishing areas of hard seabed from soft sediment areas. The resultant seabed habitat maps are being used by the Northern Territory DLRM to inform ongoing management of Darwin Harbour, with additional mapping planned for offshore areas and adjacent harbours in the region.

The Davis Coastal Seabed Mapping Survey, Antarctica (GA-4301 / AAS2201 / HI468) was acquired by the Australian Antarctic Division workboat Howard Burton during February-March 2010 as a component of Australian Antarctic Science (AAS) Project 2201 - Natural Variability and Human Induced Change on Antarctic Nearshore Marine Benthic Communities. The survey was undertaken as a collaboration between Geoscience Australia, the Australian Antarctic Division and the Australian Hydrographic Service (Royal Australian Navy). The objectives were to provide multibeam bathymetry and backscatter of the coastal region of the Vestfold Hills around Davis Station, Antarctica, to aid the understanding of sea bed character, benthic habitats, provide a basis for hydrodynamic modeling of water movement around Davis, and to update and extend the navigational charts of the region.

Geoscience Australia carried out marine surveys in Jervis Bay (NSW) in 2007, 2008 and 2009 (GA303, GA305, GA309, GA312) to map seabed bathymetry and characterise benthic environments through colocated sampling of surface sediments (for textural and biogeochemical analysis) and infauna, observation of benthic habitats using underwater towed video and stills photography, and measurement of ocean tides and wavegenerated currents. Data and samples were acquired using the Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO) Research Vessel Kimbla. Bathymetric mapping, sampling and tide/wave measurement were concentrated in a 3x5 km survey grid (named Darling Road Grid, DRG) within the southern part of the Jervis Bay, incorporating the bay entrance. Additional sampling and stills photography plus bathymetric mapping along transits was undertaken at representative habitat types outside the DRG. The "kimbla" folder contains processed multibeam backscatter data of Jarvis Bay. The SIMRAD EM3002 and EM3002D multibeam backscatter data were processed using the CMST-GA MB Process, a multibeam processing toolbox codeveloped by Geoscience Australia and Curtin University of Technology.

Geoscience Australia carried out marine surveys in southeast Tasmania in 2008 and 2009 (GA0315) to map seabed bathymetry and characterise benthic environments through observation of habitats using underwater towed video. Data was acquired using the Tasmania Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute (TAFI) Research Vessel Challenger. Bathymetric mapping was undertaken in seven survey areas, including: Freycinet Pensinula (83 sq km, east coast and shelf); Tasman Peninsula (117 sq km, east coast and shelf); Port Arthur and adjacent open coast (17 sq km); The Friars (41 sq km, south of Bruny Island); lower Huon River estuary (39 sq km); D Entrecastreaux Channel (7 sq km, at Tinderbox north of Bruny Island), and; Maria Island (3 sq km, western side). Video characterisations of the seabed concentrated on areas of bedrock reef and adjacent seabed in all mapped areas, except for D Entrecastreaux Channel and Maria Island. The "challenger" folder contains raw multibeam backscatter data from two surveys archived seperately in 0306_tasman1 and 0315_se_tasmania. The raw multibeam backscatter data were collected along survey lines using GAs Kongsberg SIMRAD EM3002 in single head configuration from aboard MV Challenger.