New compilations of levelled marine and onshore gravity and magnetic data are facilitating structural and geological interpretations of the offshore northern Perth Basin. Multi-scale edge detection helps the mapping of structural trends within the basin and complements interpretations based on seismic reflection data. Together with edge detection, magnetic source polygons determined from tilt angle aid in extrapolating exposed basement under sedimentary basins and, therefore, assist in the mapping of basement terranes. Three-dimensional gravity modelling of crustal structure indicates deeper Moho beneath the onshore and inboard parts of the Perth Basin and that crustal thinning is pronounced only under the outboard parts of the basin (Zeewcyk Sub-basin).

Various aspects of isostasy concept are intimately linked to estimation of the elastic thickness of lithosphere, amplitude of mantle-driven vertical surface motions, basin uplift and subsidence. Common assumptions about isostasy are not always justified by existing data. For example, refraction seismic data provide essential constraints to estimation of isostasy, but are rarely analysed in that respect. Average seismic velocity, which is an integral characteristic of the crust to any given depth, can be calculated from initial refraction velocity models of the crust. Geoscience Australia has 566 full crust models derived from the interpretation of such data in its database as of January 2012. Average velocity through velocity/density regression translates into average density of the crust, and then into crustal column weight to any given depth. If average velocity isolines become horizontal at some depth, this may be an indication of balanced mass distribution (i.e., isostasy) in the crust to that depth. For example, average velocity distribution calculated for a very deep Petrel sedimentary basin on the Australian NW Margin shows no sign of velocity isolines flattening with depth all the way down to at least 15 km below the deepest Moho. Similar estimates for the Mount Isa region lead to opposite conclusions with balancing of average seismic velocities achieved above the Moho. Here, we investigate average seismic velocity distribution for the whole Australian continent and its margins, uncertainties of its translation into estimates of isostasy, and the possible explanations for misbalances in isostatic equilibrium of the Australian crust.

As a result of work undertaken by Geoscience Australia during the Australian Government's Energy Security Program (2006-2011), data-poor and little-known frontier basins around Australia's continental margin are receiving increased scientific and exploration attention. Marine and airborne geophysical surveys conducted by Geoscience Australia along the eastern, southern and southwest margins of the Australian continent have yielded new aeromagnetic data, relatively closely-spaced ship-track magnetic and gravity data, industry-standard seismic reflection data and swath bathymetry data. Geoscience Australia's strategy for integrated geophysical interpretation and modelling includes: depth-to-basement determination using spectral and analytic-signal techniques applied to magnetic data; enhancement of aeromagnetic data to facilitate onshore-offshore geological interpretation; use of 3D forward and stochastic inverse modelling of gravity data to guide seismic interpretation of sediment thickness and basement structure; 3D inverse modelling of magnetic and gravity data to constrain the physical properties of the crust; and use of levelled ship-track magnetic and gravity data integrated with onshore data for multi-scale edge-detection analysis to guide interpretations of basement structure. However, Geoscience Australia's efforts to understand frontier basins are not without challenges. Our work highlights the lack of constraints on sub-basin crustal structure that leads to significant ambiguity when determining maximum sediment thickness and basement architecture. These deficiencies indicate a need for seismic refraction surveys that focus on sub-basin crustal structure. Refraction surveys should be complemented by airborne magnetic and gravity surveys that link onshore and offshore areas, and regional 2D seismic reflection surveys designed for deep sedimentary basins.

The northern Perth Basin is an under-explored part of the southwest continental margin of Australia. Parts of this basin have proven hydrocarbon potential. The basin is extensively covered by mostly 2D seismic reflection data and marine gravity and magnetic data. The seismic data helps to resolve the structural framework of the basin, but in deepwater regions, the basement-cover contact and deeper basement structure are generally not well imaged. To help overcome this limitation, integrated 3D gravity modelling was used to investigate crustal structure in onshore and offshore parts of the basin. Such modelling also relies on knowledge of crustal thickness variations, but these variations too are poorly constrained in this area. Multiple models were constructed in which the seismic data were used to fix the geometry of sedimentary layers and the fit to observed gravity was examined for various different scenarios of Moho geometry. These scenarios included: 1) a Moho defined by Airy isostatic balance, 2) a Moho based on independently-published Australia-wide gravity inversion, and 3) attempts to remove the Moho gravity effect by subtracting a long-wavelength regional trend defined by GRACE/GOCE satellite data. The modelling results suggest that the best fit to observed gravity is achieved for a model in which the thickness of the crystalline crust remains roughly constant (i.e. deeper Moho under sediment depocentres) for all but the outermost parts of the basin. This finding has implications for understanding the evolution of the Perth Basin, but remains susceptible to uncertainties in sediment thickness.

Australia's southern magma-poor rifted margin extends for over 4000 km, from the structurally complex region south of the Naturaliste Plateau in the west, to the transform plate boundary adjacent to the South Tasman Rise in the east (Figure 1a). The margin contains a series of Middle Jurassic to Cenozoic basins-the Bight, Otway, Sorell and Bass basins, and smaller depocentres on the South Tasman Rise (Figure 1b). These basins, and the architecture of the margin, evolved through repeated episodes of extension and thermal subsidence leading up to, and following, the commencement of seafloor spreading between Australia and Antarctica. Break-up took place diachronously along the margin, commencing in the west at ~83 Ma and concluding in the east at ~ 34 Ma. The Australian southern margin exhibits a gross 3-fold segmentation that is the product of basement geology and a prolonged and diachronous extension and breakup history. The basins that developed on the margin reflect those influences. Analysis of the stratigraphic evolution of those basins provides valuable constraints on the nature and timing of breakup processes in the absence of drilling on distal parts of the margin.

Three-dimensional gravity models are a useful part of improving the geological understanding of large areas in various geological settings. Such models can assist seismic interpretation, particularly in areas of poor seismic coverage. In general, forward modelling and inversion are conducted until a single model is derived that fits well to the observed gravity field. However, the value of such a model is limited because it shows only one possible solution that depends on a fixed set of underlying assumptions. These underlying assumptions are not always clear to the interpreter and an arguably more useful approach is to prepare multiple models that test various scenarios under a range of different assumptions. The misfit between observed and calculated gravity for these various models helps to highlight flaws in the assumptions behind a particular choice of physical parameters or model geometry. Identifying these flaws helps to guide improvements in the geological understanding of the area. We present case studies for sedimentary basins off western Africa and western Australia. The flawed models have been used to rethink assumptions related to the geology, crustal structure and isostatic state associated with the basins, and also to identify areas where seismic interpretation might need to be revised. The result is a more reliable interpretation in which key uncertainties are more clearly evident.

There has been a long-identified need in New Zealand for a community-developed three-dimensional model of active faults that is accessible and available to all. Over the past year, work has progressed on building and parameterising such a model – the New Zealand Community Fault Model (NZ CFM). The NZ CFM will serve as a unified and foundational resource for many societally important applications such as the National Seismic Hazard Model, Resilience to Natures Challenges Earthquake and Tsunami programme, physics-based fault systems modelling, earthquake ground-motion simulations, and tsunami hazard evaluation. Version 1.0 of the NZ CFM is nearing finalisation and release. NZ CFM v1.0 provides a simplified 3D representation of New Zealand’s crustal-scale active faults (including some selected potentially active faults) compiled at a nominal scale of 1:500,000 to 1:1,000,000. NZ CFM faults are defined based on surface traces, seismicity, seismic reflection profiles, wells, and geologic cross sections. The model presently incorporates more than 800 objects (i.e., faults), which include triangulated surface representations of those faults and associated parameters such as dip and dip direction, seismogenic rupture depth, sense of movement, slip direction, and net slip rate. Presented at the 2021 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) Conference (https://www.nzsee.org.nz/event/2021-nzsee-conference/)

Crustal structure associated with the northern Perth Basin is largely unknown. To help address this uncertainty, we constructed 3D gravity models. We adopt an approach whereby 'flawed' models are used to provide insight into basin thickness and crustal structure by highlighting areas where computed gravity does not fit measured gravity anomalies. The initial flawed models incorporate no arbitrary adjustments to geometry or density. In these models, two different Moho geometries are used, one based on Airy isostasy, the other incorporating an independently-computed Moho model for the Australian region. The resulting flawed models show that the crust of the northern Perth Basin is not in Airy isostatic equilibrium. A reasonable fit to long-wavelength observed gravity data is achieved for a model incorporating the Australia-wide Moho model. The deep Moho beneath the onshore Dandaragan Trough is interpreted to be the result of crustal-scale block rotation on the Darling Fault about a pivot point close to the Beagle Ridge. Flawed model results in the outboard Zeewyck Sub-basin suggest that the thickness of low-density sediment interpreted from seismic reflection data is underestimated. However, by making minimal adjustments to the model geometry, the gravity field over the Zeewyck Sub-basin can be explained by a deep and steep-sided depocentre associated with large variations in Moho depth over short distances. This geometry is suggestive of a transtensional formation mechanism. The flawed models do not explain the gravity field over the Turtle Dove Ridge, where computed gravity is less than observed. The results of our modelling highlight the benefits of considering 'flawed' gravity models that do not necessarily generate a good fit between observed and calculated gravity anomalies. These models help to more clearly identify areas with insufficient constraints and also provide impetus for re-assessing the interpretation of seismic reflection data.

Continental rifting and the separation of Australia from Antarctica commenced in the Middle-Late Jurassic and progressed from west to east through successive stages of crustal extension, basement-involved syn-rift faulting and thermal subsidence until the Cenozoic. Early syn-rift faults in the Bight Basin developed during NW-SE directed extension and strike mainly NE and E-W, parallel to reactivated basement structures of Paleoproterozoic or younger age in the adjacent Gawler craton. This extension was linked to reactivation of NW-striking basement faults that predetermined not only the point of breakup along the cratonic margin but the position and trend of a major intracontinental strike-slip shear zone along which much of the early displacement between Australia and Antarctica was accommodated. Following a switch to NNE-SSW extension in the Early Cretaceous, the locus of rifting shifted eastwards into the Otway Basin where basin evolution was increasingly influenced by transtensional displacements across reactivated north-south-striking terrane boundaries of Paleozoic age in the Delamerian-Ross and Lachlan Orogens. This transtensional regime persisted until 55 Ma when there was a change to north-south rifting with concomitant development of an ocean-continent transform boundary off western Tasmania and the South Tasman Rise. This boundary follows the trace of an older Paleozoic structure optimally oriented for reactivation as a strike-slip fault during the later stages of continental breakup and is one of two major basement structures for which Antarctic equivalents are readily identified. Some ocean floor fracture zones lie directly along strike from these reactivated basement structures, pointing to a link between basement reactivation and formation of the ocean floor fabrics. Together with the two basement structures, these fabrics serve as an important first order control on palaeogeographic reconstructions of the Australian and Antarctic conjugate margins.

The Major Crustal Boundaries web service displays the synthesized output of more than 30 years of acquisition of deep seismic reflection data across Australia, where major crustal-scale breaks have been interpreted in the seismic reflection profiles, often inferred to be relict sutures between different crustal blocks. The widespread coverage of the seismic profiles now provides the opportunity to construct a map of major crustal boundaries across Australia.