The Crater Line consists of a series of rock exposures outcropping in an arcuate pattern around the southwestern flank of the Rum Jungle granite. The exposed rocks are believed to represent part of the Brocks Creek group of Lower Proterozoic age. The Crater formation, the major mappable unit in the line of exposures, consists of metamorphosed clastic rocks totalling approximately 1500 feet in thickness. Significant radioactivity is restricted to three stratigraphic zones within the Crater formation. These have been mapped and are designate Crater Pebble Beds, Number One Pebble Bed, and Number Two Pebble Bed. Number One Pebble Bed appears to contain the most significant anomalies. The radioactivity is restricted to conglomerate beds. There may be a genetic relationship to the greater permeability formerly localized in the conglomeratic zones. The radioactivity is not localized by tectonic structures such as folds, faults, or changes in dip. No source of the radioactivity has been identified. The radioactivity probably emanates from members of the uranium disintegration series. Four areas containing significant anomalies and deserving further investigation were found along the Crater Line.

Accurate seismic velocity model is essential for depth conversion and rock property determination in the context of fluid flow modelling to support site selection for secure storage of carbon dioxide. The Bonaparte CO2 Storage project funded by the Australian Government will assess the carbon dioxide geological storage potential of two blocks in the Petrel Sub-basin on the Australian NW Margin. These blocks were offered as part of the 2009 release of offshore areas for greenhouse gas (GHG) storage assessment. The Petrel Sub-basin is a northwest-trending Paleozoic rift within the southern Bonaparte Basin. The geological reservoirs of interest include the Jurassic Plover Formation and the Early Cretaceous Sandpiper Sandstone. Primary and secondary seals of interest include the Late Jurassic Frigate Formation and the Cretaceous Bathurst Island Group (regional seal). Trapping mechanisms for injected CO2 may include faulted anticlines, stratigraphic traps, salt diapirs and/or migration dissolution and residual trapping. Water depths are generally less than 100m and depths to reservoir/seal pairs range between 800-2500m below the sea surface. All three main types of seismic velocity measurements are available within the area of our study: velocities derived from stacking of multi-channel reflection seismic data; velocities determined in the process of ray tracing modelling of large offset refraction data acquired by the ocean bottom seismographs (OBS) along the coincident reflection/refraction transect, and velocities from well log (sonic, vertical seismic profiling and check shot) measurements.

A brief geological examination of this deposit was made by the writer and D.N. Smith between 18th and 20th June, 1952. The deposit had been previously examined in 1951 by J. Daly of the Geophysical Section, Bureau of Mineral Resources, and by J.C. Lloyd of the N.S.W. Mines Department and the results of their investigation were available for reference. The radioactive area examined during the present investigation was an area of about 1/4 square mile of the volcanic flow in the north-eastern corner of portion 39. Samples of the quartz veinlets and of the volcanic rocks were collected, and tests carried out with the Laboratory Geiger counter in Canberra indicate that both are radioactive and that the radioactivity is slightly greater in the sample from the quartz veinlets.

In the search for deposits of radioactive minerals in Australia the area of the Barrier Ranges appears especially worthy of investigation on geological grounds because it is composed of highly mineralised pre-Cambrian rocks. Mines in this area comprise the major producing mines along the main Broken Hill lode, one developed mine of less importance (the Pinnacles), and a number of small silver, lead and copper mines scattered over the surrounding district. The present report deals with the results of a reconnaissance radio-active survey performed by the Geophysical Section of the Bureau during July and August, 1950. The work was confined to the smaller mines, attention being directed, in the first instance to the mines from which radio-active museum specimens were stated to have come. At each mine the following tests were performed: tests on dumps and residues to discover whether any quantity of stone carrying a significant content of radio-active minerals had been broken during mining operations, tests on accessible exposed faces, and tests on rocks surrounding the mines. The tests were made with portable Geiger-Mueller rate-meters. Readings taken are quoted as multiples of background count, which has been considered as a constant characteristic of the instruments, rather than as the general reading obtained on country rock in the area. In most areas these methods of defining background would lead to the same result. As mentioned later, however, in the Broken Hill area this is not the case. Generally, the schists and gneisses on this field are definitely radio-active, and a true background reading, indicative of the complete absence of radio-active minerals, is obtained only on basic rocks. A reconnaissance survey was also made over the Euriowie tin field. Tests were also made around felspar quarries at Egebeck.

Bearing in mind Mr. Kitchin's statement that the mica has been recovered from a shallow depth of about six feet only it appears to be of really good quality, and in view of the shortage of clearer types of mica it seems desirable that the deposit should be examined. The four mica specimens submitted for examination are described herein.

Two methods are outlined in this report. The first, is a method intended for the determination of porosity of consolidated sediments. The method is applicable to those sediments included in rotary drill cores and hand specimens of rock collected in the field. The second, is a method intended for the determination of permeability. It is applicable to suitably sized samples of rocks and any other substances whose constitutions permit of their being treated by the procedure set out in this method, subject to their own inherent limitations relative to this method. This report provides a detailed description of each of these methods.

<p>This data package includes raw (Level 0) and reprocessed (Level 1) HyLogging data from 25 wells in the Georgina Basin, onshore Australia. This work was commissioned by Geoscience Australia, and includes an accompanying meta-data report that documents the data processing steps undertaken and a description of the various filters (scalars) used in the processed datasets. <p>Please note: Data can be made available on request to ClientServices@ga.gov.au

The Geoscience Australia Rock Properties database stores the results measurements of scalar and vector petrophysical properties of rock and regolith specimens. Many are sourced from Geoscience Australia's mapping and research programs, but some are are compiled from published literature, university studies, the resources industry and State/Territory geological surveys. Measured properties include mass density, magnetic susceptibility, magnetic remanence, gamma, electrical conductivity and sonic velocity. The database also records analytical process information such as methods and instrument details wherever possible.

A reconnaissance geological and radiometric survey of the Mt. Cavenagh area was carried out by B.P. Walpole and J. Sleis of the geological section and J. Daly and D. Dyson of the geophysical section of the Bureau of Mineral Resources. The objects of the survey were to examine reported occurrences of radioactive minerals in this area and to determine whether further prospecting of the area for radioactive orebodies was warranted. The general geology of the area, and the economic geology of the six prospects examined, are described in this report.

Exploring for the Future (EFTF) is an Australian Government initiative focused on gathering new data and information about potential mineral, energy and groundwater resources across northern Australia. This area is generally under-explored and offers enormous potential for industry development, as it is advantageously located close to major global markets, infrastructure and hosts many prospective regions. In June 2020, the Hon Keith Pitt MP, Minister for Resources, Water and Northern Australia, announced a four year extension to this program with an expansion in scope to cover the whole of Australia. The energy component of EFTF aims to improve our understanding of the petroleum potential of frontier Australian basins. Building an understanding of geomechanical rock properties is key to understanding both conventional and unconventional petroleum systems as well as carbon storage and sedimentary geothermal systems. Under EFTF, Geoscience Australia has undertaken geomechanical work including stress modelling, shale brittleness studies, and the acquisition of new rock property data through extensive testing on samples from the Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic South Nicholson region of Queensland and the Northern Territory and the Paleozoic Kidson Sub-basin of Western Australia. These analyses are summarised herein. Providing baseline geomechanical data in frontier basins is essential as legacy data coverage can often be inadequate for making investment decisions, particularly where unconventional plays are a primary exploration target. As EFTF increases in scope, Geoscience Australia anticipates expanding these studies to encompass further underexplored regions throughout Australia, lowering the barrier to entry and encouraging greenfield exploration. <b>Citation:</b> Bailey Adam H. E., Jarrett Amber J. M., Wang Liuqi, Dewhurst David N., Esteban Lionel, Kager Shane, Monmusson Ludwig, Carr Lidena K., Henson Paul A. (2021) Exploring for the Future geomechanics: breaking down barriers to exploration. <i>The APPEA Journal </i><b>61</b>, 579-587. https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ20039