The cyclonic wind hazard over the Australian region is determined using synthetic tropical cyclone event sets derived from general circulation models (GCMs). Cyclonic wind hazard is influenced by the frequency, intensity and spatial distribution of tropical cyclones, all of which may change under future climate regimes due to influences such as warmer sea surface temperatures and changes in the global circulation. Cyclonic wind hazard is evaluated using a statistical-parametric model of tropical cyclones - the Tropical Cyclone Risk Model (TCRM) - which can be used to simulate many thousands of years of cyclone activity. TCRM is used to generate synthetic tracks which are statistically similar to the input event set - be it an historical record of other synthetic event set. After applying a parametric wind field to the simulated tracks, we use the aggregated wind fields to evaluate the average recurrence interval wind speeds for three IPCC AR4 scenarios, and make comparisons to the corresponding average recurrence interval wind speed estimates for current climate simulations. Results from the analysis of two GCMs are presented.

These datasets contain both fundamental and also final outputs in the form of files, rasters and vectors. These datasets are utilised to provide a measure of Tasmanian severe wind risk for both current climate and two climate change scenarios. To provide a measure of Tasmanian severe wind risk for both current climate and two climate change scenarios, this study has developed: (1) an understanding of severe wind hazard for two climate change scenarios (at 2060 & 2100) separately considering thunderstorm downbursts and synoptic winds and then combining the elements to construct hazard with regards to likelihood and intensity for the region. The outputs of general circulation climate models were forced by two increasing greenhouse gas trajectories (A2 & B1 scenarios) to give representative wind hazard for the respective possible future greenhouse gas concentrations scenarios. (2) an understanding of how residential building exposure may change for the case study regions (2060 & 2100) utilising the Australian Bureau of Statistics population projections (A, B & C series) and the National Exposure Information System (NEXIS) to project current trends in occupancy statistics. (3) a preliminary understanding of annualised loss due to wind exposure for urban areas within 42 Tasmanian regions (considering 10 year to 2000 year return period hazard). Regions have been ranked on the severity of loss, and key contributing factors driving the risk in these high wind risk regions are considered.

FIRE NOTE 4 page article for the BCRC/AFAC information series.

Australian building codes through the Australia/New Zealand Wind Actions Standard as well as the wind engineering community in general rely to a significant extent on the peak wind gust speed observations collected over more than 60 years by the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM). The current wind loading code and the performance of our infrastructure (residential, commercial, industrial and critical infrastructure) is based primarily on the Dines anemometer interpretation of the peak gust wind speed. In the early 1990's BoM commenced a program to replace the aging pressure tube Dynes anemometer with the Synchrotac and Almos cup anemometers. As of October 2008 only six Dynes anemometers remain in operation.

Effective disaster risk reduction is founded on knowledge of the underlying risk. While methods and tools for assessing risk from specific hazards or to individual assets are generally well developed, our ability to holistically assess risk to a community across a range of hazards and elements at risk remains limited. Developing a holistic view of risk requires interdisciplinary collaboration amongst a wide range of hazard scientists, engineers and social scientists, as well as engagement of a range of stakeholders. This paper explores these challenges and explores some of the common and contrasting issues sampled from a range of applications addressing earthquake, tsunami, volcano, severe wind, flood, and sea-level rise from projects in Australia, Indonesia and the Philippines. Key issues range from the availability of appropriate risk assessment tools and data, to the ability of communities to implement appropriate risk reduction measures. Quantifying risk requires information on the hazard, the exposure and the vulnerability. Often the knowledge of the hazard is reasonably well constrained, but exposure information (e.g., people and their assets) and measures of vulnerability (i.e., susceptibility to injury or damage) are inconsistent or unavailable. In order to fill these gaps, Geoscience Australia has developed computational models and tools which are open and freely available. As the knowledge gaps become smaller, the need is growing to go beyond the quantification of risk to the provision of tools to aid in selecting the most appropriate risk reduction strategies (e.g., evacuation plans, building retrofits, insurance, or land use) to build community resilience.

The seismicity of the Australian continent is low to moderate by world standards. However, the seismic risk is much higher for some types of Australian infrastructure due to an incompatibility of structural vulnerability with local earthquake hazard. The earthquake risk in many regional neighbours is even higher due to high hazard, community exposure and vulnerability. The Risk and Impact Analysis Group is a multidisciplinary team at Geoscience Australia that is actively engaged in research to better understand earthquake risk in Australia and to assist agencies in neighbouring countries develop similar knowledge. In this presentation aspects of this work will be described with a particular focus on engineering vulnerability, post disaster information capture and how both can point to effective mitigation options. Risk is the combination of several components (hazard, exposure, vulnerability and impact) that combine to provide measures that can be very useful for decision makers. Vulnerability is the key link that translates hazard exposure to consequence. Vulnerability is typically expressed in physical terms but includes interdependent utility system vulnerability, economic activity vulnerability and the social vulnerability of communities. All four vulnerability types have been the subject of research at GA but the physical vulnerability is the primary link to the others. Vulnerability research for Australian infrastructure will be presented in the context of a holistic risk framework. Furthermore, the work in the Philippines to develop a first order national suite of models will also be presented. Post disaster survey data is invaluable for understanding the nature of asset vulnerability, developing empirical models and validating analytical models based on structural models. Geoscience Australia has developed a range of tools to assist with damage capture that have been used for several hazard types, including earthquake. Tools include portable street view imagery capture, GPS technology and hand-held computers. Experience with the application of these tools and the information that has been derived will be described along with current activity to improve their utility.

Global climate change is putting Australia's infrastructure and in particular coastal infrastructure at risk. More than 80% of Australians live within the coastal zone. Almost 800,000 residences are within 3km of the coast and less than 6m above sea level. Much of Australia's land transport is built around road and rail infrastructure which is within the threatened coastal zone. A significant number of Australia's ports, harbours and airports are under threat. Australia's coastal zone contains several major cities, and supports agriculture, fisheries, tourism, coastal wetlands and estuaries, mangroves and other coastal vegetation, coral reefs, heritage areas and threatened species or habitats. Sea level rise is one physical effect of rising sea temperatures and is estimated at about 0.146m for 2030 (IPCC 2007) and up to 1.1m for 2100 (Antarctic and Climate Ecosystems CRC). The warming is likely to result in increases in intensity of both extra-tropical and tropical storms (spatially dependent) which are predicted to increase storm surge and severe wind hazard. Beaches, estuaries, coastal wetlands, and reefs which have adapted naturally to past changes in climate (storminess) and sea level over long time scales, now are likely to face faster rates of change. In many cases landward migration may be blocked by human land uses and infrastructure. Adaptation options include integrated coastal zone assessments and management; redesign, rebuilding, or relocation of capital assets; protection of beaches, dunes and maritime infrastructure; development zone control; and retreat plans.

Cliff Head is the only producing oil field in the offshore Perth Basin. The lack of other exploration success has lead to a perception that the primary source rock onshore (Triassic Kockatea Shale) is absent or has limited generative potential. However, recent offshore well studies show the unit is present and oil prone. Multiple palaeo-oil columns were identified within Permian reservoir below the Kockatea Shale regional seal. This prompted a trap integrity study into fault reactivation as a critical risk for hydrocarbon preservation. Breach of accumulations could be attributed to mid Jurassic extension, Valanginian breakup, margin tilt or Miocene structuring. The study focused on four prospects, covered by 3D seismic data, containing breached and preserved oil columns. 3D geomechanical modelling simulated the response of trap-bounding faults and fluid flow to mid Jurassic-Early Cretaceous NW-SE extension. Calibration of modelling results against fluid inclusion data, as well as current and palaeo-oil columns, demonstrates that along-fault fluid flow correlates with areas of high shear and volumetric strains. Localisation of deformation leads to both an increase in structural permeability promoting fluid flow, and the development of hard-linkages between reactivated Permian reservoir faults and Jurassic faults producing top seal bypass. The main structural factors controlling the distribution of permeable fault segments are: (i) failure for fault strikes 350??110?N; (ii) fault plane intersections generating high shear deformation and dilation; and (iii) preferential reactivation of larger faults shielding neighbouring structures. These results point to a regional predictive approach for assessing trap integrity in the offshore Perth Basin.

The Australian National Coastal Vulnerability Assessment (NCVA) was commissioned by the Federal Government to assess the risk to coastal communities from climate related hazards. In addition to an understanding of the impact/risk posed by the current climate, the study also examined the change in risk under a range of future climate scenarios. This assessment will provide information for application to policy decisions for, inter alia, land use, building codes, emergency management and insurance applications. Geoscience Australia coordinated the work undertaken to quantify the impact on property and infrastructure. This included the development of SMARTLINE, a nationally-consistent database of coastal morphology for the entire country, which provides critical information on the geology and landforms and their potential susceptibility to instability or degradation due to environmental or climatic factors. In a first-order attempt to assess the climate-change induced hazard to the coastal landscape, SMARTLINE data have been combined with sea-level rise (SLR) projections for 2030 and 2100, and 1 in 100 year current-climate storm surge estimates to determine potential areas of inundation and zones of instability where coastal recession due to SLR is predicted. Additionally, cyclonic wind hazard along Australia's northern coastline has been estimated using Geoscience Australia's Tropical Cyclone Risk Model, utilising synthetic tropical cyclone event sets derived from IPCC AR4 global climate models. The hazard levels have been modified for terrain, topographic and shielding effects to reflect localised variations in wind hazard.

The Garnaut Climate Change Review commissioned by Australia's State and Territory Governments examined the impacts of, and possible policy responses to, climate change on the Australian economy. This presentation discussed the methodology developed for the Review by Geoscience Australia and the outputs which provided an assessment of the impact of tropical cyclone (TC) hazard on communities in northern Australia. The study utilized predicted changes in the maximum potential intensity (MPI) to define changes in the wind hazard and storm surge potential. The MPI sets a thermodynamic, theoretical upper limit for the distribution of TC intensities for a given vertical temperature and humidity profile and a given location. Associated storm surge impacts were developed using a simple relationship between TC intensity and storm surge height and adopting the IPCC fourth assessment global mid-point sea-level rise predictions. We considered the impact on the residential building stock of severe wind and storm surge hazards associated with a number of IPCC climate change scenarios. Changes in residential building stock, for over 500 coastal statistical local areas (SLA's) from Southeast Queensland anticlockwise to Perth, were forecast using Australian Bureau of Statistics population projections through to 2100. A Probable Maximum Loss (PML) curve for each study region was obtained by considering the return-period hazard over the range from 50 to 5000 years. The average annual cost to the region due to tropical cyclones across this wide time period (5000 years), often referred to as the 'annualised loss', was evaluated for each SLA. Expressing the annualised loss as a percentage of total reconstruction demonstrates the intensity of the risk to a particular community, which is not so evident in simple dollar loss figures.