This report presents palynological data compiled and analysed as part of the National Groundwater Systems (NGS) Project. NGS is part of Exploring for the Future (EFTF)—an eight year, $225 million Australian Government funded geoscience data and information acquisition program focused on better understanding the potential mineral, energy and groundwater resources across Australia. This study builds on previous work (Hannaford et al., 2022) undertaken as part of the ‘Assessing the Status of Groundwater in the Great Artesian Basin’ project, commissioned by the Australian Government through the National Water Infrastructure Fund – Expansion. The study undertaken by MGPalaeo, in collaboration with Geoscience Australia, examined an additional 688 boreholes across the GAB and compiled 149 new palynological summary sheets having Jurassic‒Cretaceous succession, with reviewed palynology data (down to total depth). The combined borehole palynological data examined from this study and the previous GAB work (Hannaford et al., 2022) is compiled in Appendix B4. The combined dataset totals 1,394 boreholes examined and 652 with palynology in the stratigraphic interval of interest, 102 of these boreholes contained Cenozoic palynology relevant to the Lake Eyre Basin. This information has been used to revise stratigraphic correlations across the GAB (Norton & Rollet, 2022 and 2023). Initial review of the stratigraphy in the Lake Eyre Basin (LEB) compiled existing palynology from outcrop, mineral and petroleum boreholes. An additional 28 boreholes in the Upper Darling Floodplain region were examined, 16 of which contained relevant palynology. The main palynological data infill in the GAB and LEB region during this follow-up study focused on: 1. Collecting, processing and analysing new biostratigraphic data on 149 key boreholes particularly across the Eromanga and Surat basins boundary. The study focussed on integrating data in New South Wales from the southern Surat Basin and central Eromanga Basin. 2. Further palynological data infill and palynological analysis on 15 samples from 7 boreholes in the western Eromanga Basin to assess difficulties in correlating the stratigraphy across the Algebuckina Sandstone. 3. Compiling existing analyses and update any historical palynological data in the Lake Eyre Basin to reflect the latest zonation scheme developed in this study. The new palynological data combined with new zircon data from other studies in the Carpentaria and Surat basins (Foley et al., 2020, 2021, 2022; La Croix et al., 2022, respectively) provides information on the tie to the geological timescale and help refine the chronostratigraphic chart that summarises stratigraphic correlations across the Carpentaria, Surat and Eromanga basins of Hannaford et al. (2022). All boreholes were examined outside of the Cooper and Bowen basins boundaries with selected boreholes around transects defined for stratigraphic correlation review through the Cooper and Bowen basin outlines (Norton & Rollet, 2022 and 2023). As a result, most of the remaining unreviewed palynological data lies within the Cooper and Bowen basins. The results of the palynology data infill in the western Eromanga Basin, in South Australia and Northern Territory, show that the Algebuckina Sandstone section is dominated by clean sandstone and so the cuttings samples were also dominated by sand. Although attempts were made to concentrate the shale from the cuttings in the thicker shale mid formation, this did not yield results, due to the amount of caved Cretaceous material. An initial assessment of the Lake Eyre Basin palynological data and zonation scheme was undertaken using information derived from water, mineral and petroleum boreholes. This provides an initial state of knowledge for the Lake Eyre Basin that can be built on in the future. Recommendations are provided for further studies to build a better understanding of the stratigraphy in the Great Artesian and Lake Eyre basins.

This report presents a stratigraphic review of some key boreholes across the Jurassic-Cretaceous Eromanga, Surat and Carpentaria basins that form the groundwater Great Artesian Basin (GAB), as well as across the overlying Cenozoic Lake Eyre Basin (LEB), completed during the National Groundwater Systems (NGS) Project. The NGS Project is part of Exploring for the Future (EFTF)—an eight year, $225 million Australian Government funded geoscience data and information acquisition program focused on better understanding the potential mineral, energy and groundwater resources across Australia. The study presented here builds on previous work (Norton & Rollet, 2022a) undertaken as part of the ‘Assessing the Status of Groundwater in the Great Artesian Basin’ Project, commissioned by the Australian Government through the National Water Infrastructure Fund – Expansion. Although not intended to be a major re-interpretation of existing data, this stratigraphy review updates stratigraphic picks where necessary to obtain a consistent interpretation across the study area, based on the refined geological and hydrostratigraphical framework developed through this project. Problems and inconsistencies in the input data or current interpretations have been highlighted to suggest where further studies or investigations may be useful. This study includes Phase 2 of the National Groundwater Systems Project, which was undertaken by Catherine Jane Norton in collaboration with Geoscience Australia; and compiled, processed and correlated a variety of borehole log data to review the stratigraphy and improve the understanding of distribution and characteristics of Jurassic and Cretaceous sediments across the Eromanga and Surat basins and overlying LEB. To complement the previous 322 key boreholes compiled in Phase 1 (Norton & Rollet, 2022) additional stratigraphic correlations have been made between geological units of similar age (constrained using palynological data) from 706 key boreholes along 35 regional transects across the GAB and from 406 key boreholes along 20 regional transects across the central LEB. Also included in this study is Phase 3 in-fill work of four additional transects, extending the study further south in New South Wales, to tie in to the Cenozoic of the Murray Basin. This later phase 3 of the project also included a review and quality control of approximately 2,572 central LEB boreholes, and the addition of 278 boreholes in the GAB in southern Queensland and New South Wales. Phase 3 also expanded on the results used for mapping regional sand/shale ratios that began in the previous phase (Evans et al., 2020; Norton & Rollet, 2022a). Normalised Gamma Ray (GR) calculations have now been made for 1,778 LEB boreholes and 676 GAB boreholes spanning the entire sequence from the surface, through the Cenozoic and down to the base Jurassic unconformity. The previous phase, mentioned above, concentrated on either just the LEB or the GAB intervals from Cadna-owie Formation to base Jurassic. An additional 17 transects in the LEB and 27 transects in the GAB were created to visualise the lithological variation. The distribution of generalised sand/shale ratios are used to estimate the thickness of sand and shale in different formations, with implications for formation porosity and the hydraulic properties of aquifers and aquitards. This study fills data gaps identified in the previous study (Norton & Rollet, 2022) and refines the regional distribution of lithological heterogeneity in each hydrogeological unit, contributing to an improved understanding of connectivity within and between aquifers. The datasets compiled and examined in this study are in Appendix A. Attempts were made to standardise lithostratigraphic units, which are currently described using varying nomenclature, to produce a single chronostratigraphic chart across the entirety of the GAB and LEB basins. The main stratigraphic correlation infill in the GAB and LEB regions focused on: • The transition between the Eromanga and Surat basins in New South Wales and the tie-in to existing transects in Queensland and South Australia, • The Eromanga Basin in South Australia and Queensland and the tie-in to Phase 1 transects, • The central Eromanga Basin and Frome Embayment areas, extending the GAB units to the overlying Lake Eyre Basin stratigraphy to better assess potential connectivity between these basins, • The transition between the Lake Eyre and Murray Basins in the Upper Darling Floodplain (UDF) area in New South Wales and the tie-in to Phase 1 transects in New South Wales. This report and associated data package provide a data compilation on 706 and 278 key boreholes in the Surat and Eromanga basins respectively, to assist in updating the geological framework for the GAB and LEB. Recommendations are provided for further studies to continue refining the understanding of the stratigraphy in the Great Artesian and Lake Eyre basins.

This data package provides seismic interpretations that have been generated in support of the energy resource assessments under the Australia’s Future Energy Resources (AFER) project. Explanatory notes are also included. The AFER project is part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future (EFTF) Program—an eight year, $225 million Australian Government funded geoscience data and precompetitive information acquisition program to inform decision-making by government, community and industry on the sustainable development of Australia's mineral, energy and groundwater resources. By gathering, analysing and interpreting new and existing precompetitive geoscience data and knowledge, Geoscience Australia is building a national picture of Australia’s geology and resource potential. This will help support a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of all Australians. The EFTF program is supporting Australia’s transition to a low emissions economy, industry and agriculture sectors, as well as economic opportunities and social benefits for Australia’s regional and remote communities. Further details are available at http://www.ga.gov.au/eftf. The seismic interpretations build on the recently published interpretations by Szczepaniak et al. (2023) by providing updated interpretations in the AFER Project area for the Top Cadna-owie (CC10) and Top Pre-Permian (ZU) horizons, as well as interpretations for 13 other horizons that define the tops of play intervals being assessed for their energy resource potential (Figure 1). Seismic interpretations for the AFER Project are constrained by play interval tops picked on well logs that have been tied to the seismic profiles using time-depth data from well completion reports. The Pedirka and Western Eromanga basins are underexplored and contain relatively sparse seismic and petroleum well data. The AFER Project has interpreted play interval tops in 41 wells, 12 seismic horizons (Top Cadna-owie and underlying horizons) on 238 seismic lines (9,340 line kilometres), and all 15 horizons on 77 recently reprocessed seismic lines (3,370 line kilometres; Figure 2). Note that it has only been possible to interpret the Top Mackunda-Winton, Top Toolebuc-Allaru and Top Wallumbilla horizons on the reprocessed seismic lines as these are the only data that provide sufficient resolution in the shallow stratigraphic section to confidently interpret seismic horizons above the Top Cadna-owie seismic marker. The seismic interpretations are provided as point data files for 15 horizons, and have been used to constrain the zero edges for gross-depositional environment maps in Bradshaw et al. (2023) and to produce depth-structure and isochore maps for each of the 14 play intervals in Iwanec et al. (2023). The data package includes the following datasets: 1) Seismic interpretation point file data in two-way-time for up to 15 horizons using newly reprocessed seismic data and a selection of publicly available seismic lines (Appendix A). 2) Geographical layers for the seismic lines used to interpret the top Cadna-owie and underlying horizons (Cadnaowie_to_TopPrePermian_Interpretation.shp), and the set of reprocessed lines used to interpret all 15 seismic horizons (All_Horizons_Interpretation.shp; Appendix B). These seismic interpretations are being used to support the AFER Project’s play-based energy resource assessments in the Pedirka and Western Eromanga basins.

<div>This document provides metadata for the gross depositional environment (GDE) interpretations that have been generated in support of the energy resource assessments under the Australia’s Future Energy Resources (AFER) project.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div>The AFER projects is part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future (EFTF) Program—an eight year, $225 million Australian Government funded geoscience data and precompetitive information acquisition program to inform decision-making by government, community and industry on the sustainable development of Australia's mineral, energy and groundwater resources. By gathering, analysing and interpreting new and existing precompetitive geoscience data and knowledge, we are building a national picture of Australia’s geology and resource potential. This will help support a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of all Australians. The EFTF program is supporting Australia’s transition to a low emissions economy, industry and agriculture sectors, as well as economic opportunities and social benefits for Australia’s regional and remote communities. Further details are available at http://www.ga.gov.au/eftf.&nbsp;</div><div>The GDE data sets provide high level classifications of interpreted environments where sediments were deposited within each defined play interval in the Pedirka, Simpson and Western Eromanga basins. Twelve gross depositional environments have been interpreted and mapped in the study (Table 1). A total of 14 play intervals have been defined for the Pedirka, Simpson and Western Eromanga basins by Bradshaw et al. (2022, in press), which represent the main chronostratigraphic units separated by unconformities or flooding surfaces generated during major tectonic or global sea level events (Figure 1). These play intervals define regionally significant reservoirs for hydrocarbon accumulations or CO2 geological storage intervals, and often also include an associated intraformational or regional seal.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div>GDE interpretations are a key data set for play-based resources assessments in helping to constrain reservoir presence. The GDE maps also provide zero edges showing the interpreted maximum extent of each play interval, which is essential information for play-based resource assessments, and for constructing accurate depth and thickness grids.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div>GDE interpretations for the AFER Project are based on integrated interpretations of well log and seismic data, together with any supporting palynological data. Some play intervals also have surface exposures within the study area which can provide additional published paleo-environmental data. The Pedirka, Simpson and Western Eromanga basins are underexplored and contain a relatively sparse interpreted data set of 42 wells and 233 seismic lines (Figure 2). Well and outcrop data provide the primary controls on paleo-environment interpretations, while seismic interpretations constrain the interpreted zero edges for each play interval. The sparse nature of seismic and well data in the study area means there is some uncertainty in the extents of the mapped GDE’s.&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div>The data package includes the following datasets:&nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div>Play interval tops for each of the 42 wells interpreted – provided as an ‘xlsx’ file.&nbsp;</div><div>A point file (AFER_Wells_GDE) capturing the GDE interpretation for each of the 14 play intervals in each of the 42 wells – provided as both a shapefile and within the AFER_GDE_Maps geodatabase.&nbsp;</div><div>Gross depositional environment maps for each of the 14 play intervals (note that separate GDE maps have been generated for the Namur Sandstone and Murta Formation within the Namur-Murta play interval, and for the Adori Sandstone and Westbourne Formation within the Adori-Westbourne play interval) – provided as both shapefiles and within the AFER_GDE_Maps geodatabase.&nbsp;</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>These GDE data sets are being used to support the AFER Project’s play-based energy resource assessments in the Western Eromanga, Pedirka and Simpson basins.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>

The document summarises new seismic interpretation metadata for two key horizons from Base Jurassic to mid-Cretaceous strata across the western and central Eromanga Basin, and the underlying Top pre-Permian unconformity. New seismic interpretations were completed during a collaborative study between the National Groundwater Systems (NGS) and Australian Future Energy Resources (AFER) projects. The NGS and AFER projects are part of Exploring for the Future (EFTF)—an eight year, $225 million Australian Government funded geoscience data and precompetitive information acquisition program to inform decision-making by government, community and industry on the sustainable development of Australia's mineral, energy and groundwater resources. By gathering, analysing and interpreting new and existing precompetitive geoscience data and knowledge, we are building a national picture of Australia’s geology and resource potential. This will help support a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of all Australians. The EFTF program is supporting Australia’s transition to a low emissions economy, industry and agriculture sectors, as well as economic opportunities and social benefits for Australia’s regional and remote communities. Further details are available at http://www.ga.gov.au/eftf. The seismic interpretations build on previous work undertaken as part of the ‘Assessing the Status of Groundwater in the Great Artesian Basin’ (GAB) Project, commissioned by the Australian Government through the National Water Infrastructure Fund – Expansion (Norton & Rollet, 2022; Vizy & Rollet, 2022; Rollet et al., 2022; Rollet et al., in press.), the NGS Project (Norton & Rollet, 2023; Rollet et al., 2023; Vizy & Rollet, 2023) and the AFER Project (Bradshaw et al., 2022 and in press, Bernecker et al., 2022, Iwanec et al., 2023; Iwanec et al., in press). The recent iteration of revisions to the GAB geological and hydrogeological surfaces (Vizy & Rollet, 2022) provides a framework to interpret various data sets consistently (e.g., boreholes, airborne electromagnetic, seismic data) and in a 3D domain, to improve our understanding of the aquifer geometry, and the lateral variation and connectivity in hydrostratigraphic units across the GAB (Rollet et al., 2022). Vizy and Rollet (2022) highlighted some areas with low confidence in the interpretation of the GAB where further data acquisition or interpretation may reduce uncertainty in the mapping. One of these areas was in the western and central Eromanga Basin. New seismic interpretations are being used in the western Eromanga, Pedirka and Simpson basins to produce time structure and isochore maps in support of play-based energy resource assessment under the AFER Project, as well as to update the geometry of key aquifers and aquitards and the GAB 3D model for future groundwater management under the NGS Project. These new seismic interpretations fill in some data and knowledge gaps necessary to update the geometry and depth of key geological and hydrogeological surfaces defined in a chronostratigraphic framework (Hannaford et al., 2022; Bradshaw et al., 2022 and in press; Hannaford & Rollet, 2023). The seismic interpretations are based on a compilation of newly reprocessed seismic data (Geoscience Australia, 2022), as part of the EFTF program, and legacy seismic surveys from various vintages brought together in a common project with matching parameters (tying, balancing, datum correcting, etc.). This dataset has contributed to a consolidated national data coverage to further delineate groundwater and energy systems, in common data standards and to be used further in integrated workflows of mineral, energy and groundwater assessment. The datasets associated with the product provides value added seismic interpretation in the form of seismic horizon point data for two horizons that will be used to improve correlation to existing studies in the region. The product also provides users with an efficient means to rapidly access a list of core data used from numerous sources in a consistent and cleaned format, all in a single package. The following datasets are provided with this product: 1) Seismic interpretation in a digital format (Appendix A), in two-way-time, on key horizons with publically accessible information, including seismic interpretation on newly reprocessed data: Top Cadna-owie; Base Jurassic; Top pre-Permian; 2) List of surveys compiled and standardised for a consistent interpretation across the study area (Appendix B). 3) Isochore points between Top Cadna-owie and Base Jurassic (CC10-LU00) surfaces (Appendix C). 4) Geographical layer for the seismic lines compiled across Queensland, South Australia and the Northern Territory (Appendix D). These new interpretations will be used to refine the GAB geological and hydrogeological surfaces in this region and to support play-based energy resource assessments in the western Eromanga, Pedirka and Simpson basins.

<p>Geoscience Australia completed a regional assessment of the geological carbon dioxide (CO2) storage potential and petroleum prospectivity of the Browse Basin, offshore northwest Australia. This dual-purpose basin analysis study provided a new understanding of the basin’s Cretaceous succession based on new information regarding basin evolution, sequence stratigraphy, structural architecture and petroleum systems. The basin’s tectonostratigraphic framework was updated, and the integration of revised and recalibrated biostratigraphic data with well log and seismic interpretations has enabled an improved understanding of variations in depositional facies and the spatial distribution of reservoir, seal, and source rock sections. The outputs include models and maps of environments of deposition, play fairways, common risk element maps for regional-scale assessment of CO2 storage potential and petroleum systems model (Abbott et al., 2016; Edwards et al., 2015, 2016; Grosjean et al., 2015; Palu et al., 2017a and b; Rollet et al., 2016b, 2017a,b, 2018).<p> <p>This data pack includes 12 Cretaceous and Cenozoic horizons, and the regional fault maps produced from this study. This interpretation is based on data from 60 wells (Table 1) and 26 regional 2D and 3D seismic reflection surveys (Table 2) (Rollet et al., 2016a). Surfaces were converted from TWT to depth and integrated in a 3D geological model as input into a petroleum systems model (Palu et al., 2017a, b). <p>Data layers include: <p>12 regional depth surface grids and arcmap files generated for key Cretaceous and Cenozoic horizons (Figure 1; Table 3): K10.0_SB (late Tithonian), K20.0_SB (Valanginian), K30.0_SB (Late Hauterivian), K40.0_SB (Aptian), K50.0_SB (Late Cenomanian), K60.0_SB (Early Campanian), K65.0_SB (Maastrichtian), T10.0_SB (Base Cenozoic), T24.0_SB (Ypresian), T30.0_SB (Rupelian), T33.0_SB (Aquitanian) and water bottom based on bathymetry after Whiteway (2009), <p>2 fault population shapefiles (Figure 2): polygon envelop of shallow faults that formed during the Cenozoic collision between Australia and Asia, and horizon fault boundaries of deep regional faults that were formed through the Permian to Cretaceous.

The Browse Basin, located offshore on Australia¿s North West Shelf, is a proven hydrocarbon province that hosts large gas accumulations with associated condensate. Small light oil accumulations are found mostly within the Cretaceous succession. Geoscience Australia undertook a multi-disciplinary study of the Browse Basin to better understand the regional hydrocarbon prospectivity and high-grade areas with increased liquids potential in Cretaceous supersequences. The sequence stratigraphy and structural framework of the Cretaceous succession were analysed to determine the spatial relationship of reservoir and seal pairs, and areas of source rock development. Updated biostratigraphy, well lithology and log analysis, seismic stratal geometry, facies, palaeogeographic and play fairway interpretations were completed for seven supersequences from the late Tithonian to Maastrichtian (K10¿K60 supersequences). These data, together with geochemical studies of source rocks and fluids (gases and liquids), were integrated in a regional petroleum systems model to better understand source rock distribution, character, generation potential, and play prospectivity. The regional deposition of the Permo-Carboniferous, Triassic, Jurassic and Cenozoic successions were mapped to constrain the burial history model. Supersequence cross-sections and palaeogeographic maps show the distribution of gross depositional facies, revealing three main Cretaceous stratigraphic play types across the basin. These are basin-margin, clinoform topset and submarine fan plays. Geochemical analyses using molecular and stable carbon and hydrogen isotopic signatures correlate fluids in these plays with potential source rocks. The geochemical fingerprints enabled the identification of four Mesozoic petroleum systems. Burial history modelling demonstrates hydrocarbon generation from potential source rocks within the Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous supersequences. Many accumulations have a complex charge history with the mixing of hydrocarbon fluids from multiple Mesozoic source rocks, as recognised from the deconvolution of their geochemical compositions. The basin margin play occurs within the K10¿K40 supersequences (Early Cretaceous upper Vulcan and Echuca Shoals formations) along the inboard Yampi and Leveque shelves. The K20¿K30 (Echuca Shoals Formation) basin margin play received gas (Caspar 1A) potentially sourced from the J10¿J20 supersequences (Plover Formation) and oil (Gwydion 1) sourced from the K20¿K30 supersequences (Echuca Shoals Formation). Seal quality and thickness are good except where the seal facies pinch out around basement highs on the Yampi Shelf, and where they are truncated by the K50 sequence boundary (Wangarlu Formation) inboard on the Leveque Shelf. The K40 basin margin play (Jamieson Formation) received gas (Gwydion 1, Cornea field) that is most likely sourced from the J10¿J20 supersequences (Plover Formation) and oil (Cornea field) sourced from the K20¿K30 supersequences (Echuca Shoals Formation). The marine shales in the K20¿K30 supersequences (Echuca Shoals Formation) have low hydrogen indices (~200 mg hydrocarbons/gTOC) and hence may only be able to expel sufficient hydrocarbons to sustain migration over short distances. The co-existence of oil sourced from these successions and gas sourced from the J10¿J20 supersequences (Plover Formation) suggests that potential Cretaceous-sourced liquids were mobilised and carried to the shelf edge by co-migrating Early¿Middle Jurassic Plover-derived gas. Once present within these shallow reservoirs, further loss of the low and mid-chain hydrocarbons occurred through leakage, water washing and biodegradation. Together, the migration and secondary alteration processes have enhanced the liquids potential on the basin margin. The clinoform topset play extends between the basin-margin and the shelf-edge. These plays consist of higher order progradational sandstone units overlain by intraformational and top seals. The K10 clinoform topset play (namely the Brewster Member of the Upper Vulcan Formation) hosts gas in the Ichthys/Prelude and Burnside accumulations. The gas is probably largely sourced from the organic-rich shales of the J30¿K10 supersequences (Vulcan Formation), with an additional contribution from the J10¿J20 supersequences (Plover Formation) in satellite fields, such as observed at Concerto 1 ST1. Other similar K10 plays are mapped in the southern Caswell and Oobagooma sub-basins and could receive charge from J30¿K10 potential source pods. The K30 clinoform topset play (M. australis sand of the Echuca Shoals Formation) is a reservoir for gas on the Leveque Shelf at Psepotus 1, with additional evidence for oil migration into this play at Braveheart 1 in the northern Caswell Sub-basin. This play extends in underexplored areas on the Leveque Shelf to the inboard Barcoo Sub-basin and on the southern Yampi Shelf to the outboard Caswell Sub-basin. The K40 clinoform topset play (D. davidii sand of the Jamieson Formation) hosts gas (Adele 1) and light oil (Caswell 1). The light oil is probably sourced primarily from the K20¿K30 supersequences (Echuca Shoals Formation) in the central Caswell Sub-basin. This play extends outboard in the Caswell Sub-basin to Caswell 2 ST2 and Phrixus 1. The submarine fan play comprises sandstone-prone basin floor fans that extend across the basin floor from the toe of the slope and are sealed by down-lapping mudstone facies. This play may overlie either second, third, fourth or fifth-order sequence boundaries and are particularly well developed within the Upper Cretaceous K60 supersequence (Wangarlu Formation). The K30 submarine fan play (Echuca Shoals Formation) hosts gas in the outboard northern Caswell Sub-basin (Abalone Deep 1 and Adele 1). Isotopic evidence for the gas at Adele 1 suggests that the K20¿K30 supersequences (Echuca Shoals Formation) is the most likely source. This play is underexplored elsewhere within the basin, but it includes the tentatively interpreted play around Omar 1 in the Barcoo Sub-basin. There is evidence for oil migration through the K50 (Wangarlu Formation) submarine fan play at Discorbis 1, with the source of hydrocarbons possibly being from the K20¿K30 supersequences (Echuca Shoals Formation). This play extends into the inboard northern Caswell Sub-basin. The K60 submarine fan (Wangarlu Formation) play either hosts oil and gas (Abalone 1, Caswell 2 and Marabou 1) or contains evidence of hydrocarbon migration (Discorbis 1 and Gryphaea 1) in numerous wells. The most likely source of petroleum is from the K20¿K30 supersequences (Echuca Shoals Formation). The results of this study reveal the existence of multiple stacked Cretaceous plays in the basin, including those in underexplored vacant acreage. Presented at the 2017 Southeast Asia Petroleum Exploration Society (SEAPEX) Conference

<div>This data package provides depth and isochore maps generated in support of the energy resource assessments under the Australia’s Future Energy Resources (AFER) project. Explanatory notes are also included.</div><div><br></div><div>The AFER project is part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future (EFTF) Program—an eight year, $225 million Australian Government funded geoscience data and precompetitive information acquisition program to inform decision-making by government, community and industry on the sustainable development of Australia's mineral, energy and groundwater resources. By gathering, analysing and interpreting new and existing precompetitive geoscience data and knowledge, Geoscience Australia is building a national picture of Australia’s geology and resource potential. This will help support a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of all Australians. The EFTF program is supporting Australia’s transition to a low emissions economy, industry and agriculture sectors, as well as economic opportunities and social benefits for Australia’s regional and remote communities. Further details are available at http://www.ga.gov.au/eftf.</div><div><br></div><div>The depth and isochore maps are products of depth conversion and spatial mapping seismic interpretations by Szczepaniak et al. (2023) and Bradshaw et al. (2023) which interpreted 15 regional surfaces. These surfaces represent the top of play intervals being assessed for their energy resource potential (Figure 1). These seismic datasets were completed by play interval well tops by Bradshaw et al. (in prep), gross depositional environment maps, zero edge maps by Bradshaw et al. (in prep), geological outcrop data as well as additional borehole data from Geoscience Australia’s stratigraphic units database.</div><div><br></div><div>Depth and isochore mapping were undertaken in two to interactive phases; </div><div><br></div><div>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A Model Framework Construction Phase – In this initial phase, the seismic interpretation was depth converted and then gridded with other regional datasets. </div><div><br></div><div>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A Model Refinement and QC Phase – This phase focused on refining the model and ensuring quality control. Isochores were generated from the depth maps created in the previous phase. Smoothing and trend modelling techniques were then applied to the isochore to provide additional geological control data in areas with limited information and to remove erroneous gridding artefacts.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>The final depth maps were derived from isochores, constructing surfaces both upward and downward from the CU10_Cadna-owie surface, identified as the most data-constrained surface within the project area. This process, utilizing isochores for depth map generation, honours all the available well and zero edge data while also conforming to the original seismic interpretation.</div><div><br></div><div>This data package includes the following datasets: </div><div><br></div><div>1)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Depth maps, grids and point datasets measured in meters below Australian Height Datum (AHD, for 15 regional surfaces (Appendix A). </div><div>2)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Isochore maps, grids and point datasets measured in meters, representing 14 surfaces/play internals (Appendix B).</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>These depth and isochore maps are being used to support the AFER Project’s play-based energy resource assessments in the Pedirka and western Eromanga basins, and will help to support future updates of 3D geological and hydrogeological models for the Great Artesian Basin by Geoscience Australia.</div><div><br></div>