The ‘Australia’s Future Energy Resources’ (AFER) project is a four-year multidisciplinary investigation of the potential energy commodity resources in selected onshore sedimentary basins. The resource assessment component of the project incorporates a series of stacked sedimentary basins in the greater Pedirka-western Eromanga region in eastern central Australia. Using newly reprocessed seismic data and applying spatially enabled, exploration play-based mapping tools, a suite of energy commodity resources have been assessed for their relative prospectivity. One important aspects of this study has been the expansion of the hydrocarbon resource assessment work flow to include the evaluation of geological storage of carbon dioxide (GSC) opportunities. This form of resource assessment is likely to be applied as a template for future exploration and resource development, since the storage of greenhouse gases has become paramount in achieving the net-zero emissions target. It is anticipated that the AFER project will be able to highlight future exploration opportunities that match the requirement to place the Australian economy firmly on the path of decarbonisation.

CO₂ enhanced oil recovery (CO₂-EOR) is a proven technology that can extend the life of oil fields, permanently store CO₂, and improve the recovery of oil and condensate over time. Although CO₂-EOR has been used successfully for decades, particularly in the United States, it has not gained traction in Australia to date. In this study, we assemble and evaluate data relevant to CO₂-EOR for Australia’s key oil and condensate producing basins, and develop a national-scale, integrated basin ranking that shows which regions have the best overall conditions for CO₂-EOR. The primary goals of our study are to determine whether Australia’s major hydrocarbon provinces exhibit suitable geological and oil characteristics for successful CO₂-EOR activities and to rank the potential of these basins for CO₂-EOR. Each basin is assessed based on the key parameters that contribute to a successful CO₂-EOR prospect: oil properties (API gravity), pressure, temperature, reservoir properties (porosity, permeability, heterogeneity), availability of CO₂ for EOR operations, and infrastructure to support EOR operations. The top three ranked basins are the onshore Bowen-Surat, Cooper-Eromanga and offshore Gippsland Basins, which are all in relatively close proximity to the large east coast energy/oil markets. A significant factor that differentiates these three basins from the others considered in this study is their relatively good access to CO₂ and well-developed infrastructure. The next three most suitable basins are located offshore on the Northwest Shelf (Browse, Carnarvon, and Bonaparte Basins). While these three basins have mostly favourable oil properties and reservoir conditions, the sparse CO₂ sources and large distances involved lead to lower scores overall. The Canning and Amadeus Basins rank the lowest among the basins assessed, being relatively immature and remote hydrocarbon provinces, and lacking the required volumes of CO₂ or infrastructure to economically implement CO₂-EOR. In addition to ranking the basins for successful implementation of CO₂-EOR, we also provide some quantification of the potential recoverable oil in the various basins. These estimates used the oil and condensate reserve numbers that are available from national databases combined with application of internationally observed tertiary recovery factors. Additionally, we estimate the potential mass of CO₂ that would be required to produce these potential recoverable oil and condensate resources. In the large oil- and condensate-bearing basins, such as the Carnarvon and Gippsland Basins, some scenarios require over a billion tonnes of CO₂ to unlock the full residual resource, which points to CO₂ being the limiting factor for full-scale CO₂-EOR development. Even taking a conservative view of the available resources and potential extent of CO₂-EOR implementation, sourcing sufficient amounts of CO₂ for large-scale deployment of the technology presents a significant challenge. <b>Citation:</b> Tenthorey, E., Kalinowski, A., Wintle, E., Bagheri, M., Easton, L., Mathews, E., McKenna, J., Taggart, I. 2022. Screening Australia’s Basins for CO2-Enhanced Oil Recovery (December 6, 2022). <i>Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference (GHGT-16) 23-24 Oct 2022</i>, Available at SSRN: <a href="https://ssrn.com/abstract=4294743">https://ssrn.com/abstract=4294743</a> or <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4294743">http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4294743</a>

The Adavale Basin, home to the Boree Salt, is a potential option for underground hydrogen storage (UHS) due to its close proximity to industrial infrastructure, existing pipelines and significant renewable energy sources. This study builds upon a previously constructed 3D geological model to examine the feasibility of developing salt caverns for UHS. The study integrates well data and regional geology, as well as analyses on mineralogy, geochemistry and petrophysical and geomechanical properties of the Boree Salt. Results highlight that the Boree Salt is predominantly halite (96.5%), with a net salt thickness of ~540 m encountered in Bury 1, and has excellent seal properties. Furthermore, the formation overburden pressure gradient implies favourable conditions for storing hydrogen in the Boree Salt. To illustrate the feasibility of UHS, a conceptual design of a cylindrical salt cavern at depth intervals of 1600 – 1950 m is presented. A single 60 m diameter cavern could provide up to 203 GWh (or ~ 6000 tonnes) of hydrogen energy storage. Further investigation to improve our understanding on the Boree Salt extent is recommended.

The integrated use of seismic and gravity data can help to assess the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt caverns in the offshore Polda Basin, South Australia. Geophysical integration software was trialled to perform simultaneous modelling of seismic amplitudes and traveltime information, gravity, and gravity gradients within a 2.5D cross-section. The models were calibrated to existing gravity data, seismic and well logs improving mapping of the salt thickness and depth away from well control. Models included known salt deposits in the offshore parts of the basin and assessed the feasibility for detection of potential salt deposits in the onshore basin, where there is limited well and seismic coverage. The modelling confirms that candidate salt cavern storage sites with salt thicknesses greater than 400-500 m should be detectable on low altitude airborne gravity surveys. Identification of lower cost onshore storage sites will require careful calibration of gravity models against measured data, rather than relying on the observation of rounded anomalies associated with salt diapirism. Ranking of the most prospective storage sites could be optimized after the acquisition of more detailed gravity and gradiometry data, preferably accompanied by seismic reprocessing or new seismic data acquisition.

The Exploring for the Future program Showcase 2023 was held on 15-17 August 2023. Day 3 - 17th August talks included: Geological Processes and Resources Session Large scale hydrogen storage: The role of salt caverns in Australia’s transition to net zero – Dr Andrew Feitz Basin-Hosted Base Metal Deposits – Dr Evgeniy Bastrakov Upper Darling Floodplain: Groundwater dependent ecosystem assessment – Dr Sarah Buckerfield Atlas of Australian Mine Waste: Waste not, want not – Jane Thorne Resource Potential Theme National-scale mineral potential assessments: supporting mineral exploration in the transition to net zero – Dr Arianne Ford Australia’s Onshore Basin Inventories: Energy – Tehani Palu Prioritising regional groundwater assessments using the national hydrogeological inventory – Dr Steven Lewis Assessing the energy resources potential in underexplored regions – Dr Barry Bradshaw You can access the recording of the talks from YouTube here: <a href="https://youtu.be/pc0a7ArOtN4">2023 Showcase Day 3 - Part 1</a> <a href="https://youtu.be/vpjoVYIjteA">2023 Showcase Day 3 - Part 2</a>

The discovery of strategically located salt structures, which meet the requirements for geological storage of hydrogen, is crucial to meeting Australia’s ambitions to become a major hydrogen producer, user and exporter. The use of the AusAEM airborne electromagnetic (AEM) survey’s conductivity sections, integrated with multidisciplinary geoscientific datasets, provides an excellent tool for investigating the near-surface effects of salt-related structures, and contributes to assessment of their potential for underground geological hydrogen storage. Currently known salt in the Canning Basin includes the Mallowa and Minjoo salt units. The Mallowa Salt is 600-800 m thick over an area of 150 × 200 km, where it lies within the depth range prospective for hydrogen storage (500-1800 m below surface), whereas the underlying Minjoo Salt is generally less than 100 m thick within its much smaller prospective depth zone. The modelled AEM sections penetrate to ~500 m from the surface, however, the salt rarely reaches this level. We therefore investigate the shallow stratigraphy of the AEM sections for evidence of the presence of underlying salt or for the influence of salt movement evident by disruption of near-surface electrically conductive horizons. These horizons occur in several stratigraphic units, mainly of Carboniferous to Cretaceous age. Only a few examples of localised folding/faulting have been noted in the shallow conductive stratigraphy that have potentially formed above isolated salt domes. Distinct zones of disruption within the shallow conductive stratigraphy generally occur along the margins of the present-day salt depocentre, resulting from dissolution and movement of salt during several stages. This study demonstrates the potential AEM has to assist in mapping salt-related structures, with implications for geological storage of hydrogen. In addition, this study produces a regional near-surface multilayered chronostratigraphic interpretation, which contributes to constructing a 3D national geological architecture, in support of environmental management, hazard mapping and resource exploration. <b>Citation: </b>Connors K. A., Wong S. C. T., Vilhena J. F. M., Rees S. W. & Feitz A. J., 2022. Canning Basin AusAEM interpretation: multilayered chronostratigraphic mapping and investigating hydrogen storage potential. In: Czarnota, K (ed.) Exploring for the Future: Extended Abstracts, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/146376

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) in halite caverns will become an essential technology to supplement energy supply networks. This study examines the feasibility of UHS in the offshore Polda Basin by integrating previous seismic interpretation, well data and regional geology information. The Mercury structure in the central – east Polda Basin has extensive halite accumulations (both vertically and laterally) and has been identified as an area with high UHS potential. The net halite thickness is more than 1000 m, while the total potential area is about 217 km². Well data from the Mercury 1 well show a low thermal gradient (1.7–2.1 °C/100m) and overburden pressure gradient of approximately 18 ppg, providing effective gas operation pressure for UHS. To illustrate the feasibility of UHS, a conceptual design of a halite cavern is provided for a depth range of 1650–2000 m. Caverns with diameters of 60 m and 100 m are estimated to have storage capacities of approximately 240 GWh and 665 GWh, respectively. Multiple halite caverns could be constructed within the extensive Mercury halite accumulation. Further investigation into the potential for salt accumulations in the onshore Polda Basin is recommended. <b>Citation: </b>Feitz A. J., Wang L., Rees S. & Carr L., 2022. Feasibility of underground hydrogen storage in a salt cavern in the offshore Polda Basin. In: Czarnota, K. (ed.) Exploring for the Future: Extended Abstracts, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/146501

Natural hydrogen is receiving increasing interest as a potential low-carbon fuel. There are various mechanisms for natural hydrogen generation but the reduction of water during oxidation of iron in minerals is recognised to be the major source of naturally generated H2. While the overall reaction is well known, the identity and nature of the key rate limiting steps is less understood. This study investigates the dominant reaction pathways through the use of kinetic modelling. The modelling results suggest there are a number of conditions required for effective H2 production from iron minerals. These include the presence of ultramafic minerals that are particularly high in Fe rather than Mg content, pH in the range of 8 to 10, solution temperatures in the 200 to 300oC range, and strongly reducing conditions. High reaction surface area is key and this could be achieved by the presence of finely deposited material and/or assemblages of high porosity or with mineral assemblages with surface sites that are accessible to water. Finally, conditions favouring the co-deposition of Ni together with FeO/Fe(OH)2-containing minerals such as brucite (and, possibly, magnetite) could enhance H2 generation

<div>Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is gaining momentum globally. The Global CCS Institute notes in their Status of CCS 2023 report that there are 26 carbon capture and storage projects under construction and a further 325 projects in development, with a total capture capacity of 361 million tonnes per year (Mt/y) of carbon dioxide (CO2). Some CCS projects require the extraction of brackish or saline water (referred to here on in as brine) from the storage formation to manage increased pressure resulting from CO2 injection and/or to optimise subsurface storage space. It is important to consider the management of extracted brine as the CCS industry scales up due to implications for project design, cost and location as well as for the responsible management of the ‘waste’ or by-product brine. The use and disposal of reservoir brine has been investigated for CCS projects around the world, but not for Australian conditions. We have undertaken this review to explore how extracted brine could potentially be managed by CCS projects across Australia.&nbsp;</div>

Internationally, the number of carbon capture and storage (CCS) projects has been increasing with more than 61 new CCS facilities added to operations around the globe in 2022, including six projects in Australia (GCCSI, 2022). The extraction of reservoir fluid will be an essential component of the CCS workflow for some of projects in order to manage reservoir pressure variations and optimise the subsurface storage space. While we refer to reservoir fluid as brine throughout this paper for simplicity, reservoir fluids can range from brackish to more saline (briny) water. Brine management requires early planning, as it has implications for the project design and cost, and can even unlock new geological storage space in optimal locations. Beneficial use and disposal options for brine produced as a result of carbon dioxide (CO2) storage has been considered at a regional or national scale around the world, but not yet in Australia. For example, it may be possible to harvest energy, water, and mineral resources from extracted brine. Here, we consider how experiences in brine management across other Australian industries can be transferred to domestic CCS projects.