The North West Integrated System (NWIS) provides the capability to view the Horizon Power Network which services the communities located within the Pilbara region of Western Australia.

Small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) measurements were performed on 32 rock samples from the southern Georgina Basin, central Australia to assess nanopore anisotropy. Anisotropy can only be determined from oriented core material, hence the samples were cut perpendicular to bedding in cores selected from three wells that intersect the base of the hydrocarbon-bearing, organic-rich middle Cambrian Arthur Creek Formation; the latter is the source rock for both unconventional and conventional plays in the basin. The evolution of anisotropy of two-dimensional SANS intensity profiles with depth (for pore diameters ranging from 10 nm to 100 nm) was quantified and correlated with SANS intensity and total organic carbon (TOC) content. Our results confirm hydrocarbon generation at the base of the Arthur Creek Formation. The nanopore anisotropy in the basal Arthur Creek Formation at the well locations CKAD0001 (oil generation window) and MacIntyre 1 (late oil generation window) varies roughly according to normal compaction. When the Arthur Creek Formation is in the gas window, as sampled at Baldwin 1, there is a strong (negative) correlation between the average vertical-to-horizontal pore shape anisotropy and SANS intensity. The results indicate that unconventional gas production from organic-rich regions of over mature shale may be adversely affected by abnormal pore compaction.

Exploring for the Future (EFTF) is a four-year $100.5 million initiative by the Australian Government conducted by Geoscience Australia in partnership with state and Northern Territory government agencies, CSIRO and universities to provide new geoscientific datasets for frontier regions. As part of this program, Geoscience Australia acquired two new seismic surveys that collectively extend across the South Nicholson Basin (L120 South Nicholson seismic line) and into the Beetaloo Sub-basin of the McArthur Basin (L212 Barkly seismic line). Interpretation of the seismic has resulted in the discovery of new basins that both contain a significant section of presumed Proterozoic strata. Integration of the seismic results with petroleum and mineral systems geochemistry, structural analyses, geochronology, rock properties and a petroleum systems model has expanded the knowledge of the region for energy and mineral resources exploration. These datasets are available through Geoscience Australia’s newly developed Data Discovery Portal, an online platform delivering digital geoscientific information, including seismic locations and cross-section images, and field site and well-based sample data. Specifically for the EFTF Energy project, a petroleum systems framework with supporting organic geochemical data has been built to access source rock, crude oil and natural gas datasets via interactive maps, graphs and analytical tools that enable the user to gain a better and faster understanding of a basin’s petroleum prospectivity. <b>Citation:</b> Henson Paul, Robinson David, Carr Lidena, Edwards Dianne S., MacFarlane Susannah K., Jarrett Amber J. M., Bailey Adam H. E. (2020) Exploring for the Future—a new oil and gas frontier in northern Australia. <i>The APPEA Journal</i><b> 60</b>, 703-711. https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ19080

The Power System Review (Review) is prepared by the NT Government's Utilities Commission with the aim to provide the routine release of comprehensive and authoritative data to industry participants, prospective participants, customers, regulators and policymakers.

The ca. 1.5–1.3 Ga Roper Group of the greater McArthur Basin is a component of one of the most extensive Precambrian hydrocarbon-bearing basins preserved in the geological record, recently assessed as of 429 million bbl oil (68 million cubic meters of oil) and between 8 and 118 TCF (222.56 billion cubic meters) of gas (in place). It was deposited in an intracratonic sea, referred to here as the McArthur-Yanliao gulf. The Velkerri Formation forms the major deep-water facies of the Roper Group. Trace metal redox proxies from this formation indicate that it was deposited in stratified waters, in which a shallow oxic layer overlay suboxic to anoxic waters. These deep waters became episodically euxinic during periods of high organic carbon export. The Velkerri Formation has organic carbon contents that reach ∼10 wt. %. Variations in organic carbon isotopes are consistent with organic carbon enrichment being associated with increases in primary productivity and export, rather than flooding surfaces or variations in mineralogy. Although deposition of the Velkerri Formation in an intracontinental setting has been well established, recent global reconstructions show a broader mid to low latitude gulf, with deposition of the Velkerri Formation being coeval with the widespread deposition of organic-rich rocks across northern Australia and northern China. The deposition of these organic-rich rocks may have been accompanied by significant oxygenation associated with such widespread organic carbon burial during the Mesoproterozoic. <b>Citation:</b> Grant M. Cox, Alan S. Collins, Amber J. M. Jarrett, Morgan L. Blades, April V. Shannon, Bo Yang, Juraj Farkas, Philip A. Hall, Brendan O’Hara, David Close, Elizabeth T. Baruch; A very unconventional hydrocarbon play: The Mesoproterozoic Velkerri Formation of northern Australia. <i>AAPG Bulletin</i> 2022;; 106 (6): 1213–1237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1306/12162120148

The Browse Basin hosts considerable gas and condensate resources, including the Ichthys and Prelude fields that are being developed for liquefied natural gas (LNG) production. Oil discoveries are sub-economic. This multi-disciplinary study integrating sequence stratigraphy, palaeogeography and geochemical data has mapped the spatial and temporal distribution of Jurassic to earliest Cretaceous source rocks. This study allows a better understanding of the source rocks contribution to the known hydrocarbon accumulations and charge history in the basin, including in underexplored areas. The Jurassic to earliest Cretaceous source rocks have been identified as being the primary sources of the gases and condensates recovered from accumulations in the Browse Basin as follows: - The Lower–Middle Jurassic J10–J20 (Plover Formation) organic-rich source rocks have been deposited along the northeast-southwest trending fluvial-deltaic system associated with a phase of pre-breakup extension. They have charged gas reservoired within J10–J20 accumulations on the Scott Reef Trend and in the central Caswell Sub-basin at Ichthys/Prelude, and in the Lower Cretaceous K40 supersequence on the Yampi Shelf. - Late Jurassic–earliest Cretaceous J30–K10 source rocks are interpreted to have been deposited in a rift, north of the Scott Reef Trend and along the Heywood Fault System (e.g. Callovian–Tithonian J30–J50 supersequences, lower Vulcan Formation). The J30–K10 shales are believed to have sourced wet gas reservoired in the K10 sandstone (Brewster Member) in the Ichthys/Prelude and Burnside accumulations, and potentially similar plays in the southern Caswell Sub-basin. - The organic-rich source rocks observed in the Heywood Graben may be associated with deeper water marine shales with higher plant input into the isolated inboard rift. They are the potential source of fluids reservoired within the Crux accumulation, which has a geochemical composition more closely resembling a petroleum system in the southern Bonaparte Basin.

The Energy component of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future (EFTF) program is aimed at improving our understanding of the petroleum resource potential of northern Australia, including the Lawn Hill Platform region of the Isa Superbasin. The Paleoproterozoic Isa Superbasin in northwestern Queensland contains organic rich sedimentary units with the potential to host both conventional and unconventional petroleum systems (Gorton & Troup, 2018). On the Lawn Hill Platform, the River and Lawn supersequences of the Isa Superbasin host the recently discovered Egilabria shale gas play and are considered highly prospective shale gas targets. However, the lateral extent of these plays is currently unknown due to the limited well and associated geochemical data. To aid in the identification of new areas with the potential to host active petroleum systems, this work assesses the burial and thermal history of the Lawn Hill Platform (Figure 1) by using organic richness, quality and thermal maturity of source rocks of the Isa Superbasin. This assessment is based on a compilation of updated and quality controlled publicly available total organic carbon (TOC), Rock-Eval pyrolysis and organic matter reflectance data, and combines revised assessments of the depth structure and isopach mapping by Bradshaw et al., (2018, in press). Burial-thermal relationships in the basin have been difficult to determine in the past, usually attributed to multiple hydrothermal events which has resulted in erratic, and occasionally inverted, maturity reflectance profiles (Gorton and Troup, 2018; Glikson, 1993). Additional difficulties that contribute large uncertainties to our understanding are estimating the burial history across the basin, especially the maximum depth of burial and hence the estimated amount of erosion. Initial modelling suggests erosion amounts could range anywhere from several hundreds of meters to several thousands of meters across the Lawn Hill Platform region (Figure 2). Burial and thermal history modelling is calibrated using paleo-maturity data (reflectance profiles as mentioned above, Figure 2), which is poorly constrained. Because of the age (Paleoproterozoic) of the organic matter, reflectance values of alginite and bitumen were used, which are not always comparable to the standard vitrinite reflectance profiles that are typically used for burial and thermal history modelling calibration. In this study other options of burial-thermal model calibrations were assessed to aid in characterising the petroleum potential of this region, including; bottom hole temperature, developing an improved Tmax conversion equation specific to the Isa Superbasin region, using published conversion equations to convert alginite and bitumen reflectance to vitrinite equivalent reflectance, using HI as an indicator of thermal history, oxygen isotopes (δ18O), and fluid inclusion geothermometry. Abstract and poster for presentation at the Australian Organic Geochemistry Conference 2018

Petroleum geochemical datasets and information are essential to government for evidence-based decision making on natural resources, and to the petroleum industry for de-risking exploration. Geoscience Australia’s newly built Data Discovery Portal (https://portal.ga.gov.au/) enables digital discoverability and accessibility to key petroleum geochemical datasets. The portal’s web map services and web feature services allow download and visualisation of geochemical data for source rocks and petroleum fluids, and deliver a petroleum systems framework for northern Australian basins. The Petroleum Source Rock Analytics Tool enables interrogation of source rock data within boreholes and field sites, and facilitates correlation of these elements of the petroleum system within and between basins. The Petroleum Systems Summary Assessment Tool assists the user to search and query components of the petroleum system(s) identified within a basin. The portal functionality includes customised data searches, and visualisation of data via interactive maps, graphs and geoscientific tools. Integration of the petroleum systems framework with the supporting geochemical data enables the Data Discovery Portal to unlock the value of these datasets by affording the user a one-stop access to interrogate the data. This allows greater efficiency and performance in evaluating the petroleum prospectivity of Australia’s sedimentary basins, facilitating and accelerating decision making around exploration investment to ensure Australia’s future resource wealth <b>Citation:</b> Edwards, D.S., MacFarlane, S.K., Grosjean, E., Buckler, T., Boreham, C.J., Henson, P., Cherukoori, R., Tracey-Patte, T., van der Wielen, S., Ray, J. and Raymond, O., 2020. Australian source rocks, fluids and petroleum systems – a new integrated geoscience data discovery portal for maximising data potential. In: Czarnota, K., Roach, I., Abbott, S., Haynes, M., Kositcin, N., Ray, A. and Slatter, E. (eds.) Exploring for the Future: Extended Abstracts, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, 1–4.

Northern Australia contains extensive Proterozoic aged sedimentary basins that contain organic-rich rocks with the potential to host major petroleum and basin-hosted mineral systems (Figures 1 and 2). These intracratonic basins include the greater McArthur Basin including the McArthur and Birrindudu basins and the Tomkinson Provence (Close 2014), the Isa Superbasin and the South Nicholson Basin. The sedimentary sections within these basins are assumed to be of equivalent age and deposited under similar climatic controls resulting in correlative lithology, source facies and stratigraphic intervals. The greater McArthur Basin contains Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic organic-rich siltstones and shales with the potential to generate conventional oil and gas deposits, self-sourced continuous shale oil and shale gas targets (Munson 2014; Revie 2017; Weatherford Laboratories 2017). Exploration has focused on the Beetaloo Sub-basin where organic-rich siltstones of the Velkerri Formation contain up to 10 weight percent total organic carbon (wt % TOC) and have been assessed to contain 118 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of gas-in-place (Munson 2014; Revie 2017; Weatherford Laboratories 2017; Revie and Normington 2018). Other significant source rocks include the Kyalla Formation of the Roper Group, the Barney Creek, Yalco and Lynott formations of the McArthur Group, the Wollogorang, and perhaps the McDermott formations of the Tawallah Group and the Vaughton Siltstone of the Balma Group in the northern greater McArthur Basin (Munson 2014). These source rocks are host to diverse play types, for example, Cote et al (2018) describes five petroleum plays in the Beetaloo Sub-basin; the Velkerri shale dry gas play, the Velkerri liquids-rich gas play, the Kyalla shale and hybrid liquid-rich gas play and the Hayfield Sandstone oil/condensate play. This highlights the large shale and tight gas resource potential of the McArthur Basin, the full extent of these resources are poorly understood and insufficiently quantified. More work is needed to characterise the source rocks, the petroleum generative potential, fluid migration pathways, the fluid types and the thermal and burial history to understand the hydrocarbon prospectivity of the basin. The Exploring for the Future (EFTF) program is a four-year (2016?-2020) $100.5 million initiative by the Australian Government conducted in partnership with state and Northern Territory government agencies, other key government, research and industry partners and universities. EFTF aims to boost northern Australia's attractiveness as a destination for investment in resource exploration. The Energy Systems Branch at Geoscience Australia has undertaken a regional study on the prospectivity of several northern Australian basins by expanding our knowledge of petroleum and mineral system geochemistry. Here we highlight some of the results of this ongoing program with a primary focus on the greater McArthur Basin. Abstract submitted to and presented at the Annual Geoscience Exploration Seminar (AGES) 2019 (https://www.aig.org.au/events/ages-2019/)

An updated National Seismic Hazard Assessment of Australia was released in 2018 (the NSHA18). This assessment leveraged off advances in earthquake-hazard science in Australia and analogue tectonic regions to offer many improvements over its predecessors. The outcomes of the assessment represent a significant shift in the way national-scale seismic hazard is modelled in Australia, and so challenged long-held notions of seismic hazard amongst the Australian seismological and earthquake engineering community. The NSHA18 is one of the most complex national-scale seismic hazard assessments conducted to date, comprising 19 independent seismic source models (contributed by Geoscience Australia and third-party contributors) with three tectonic region types, each represented by at least six ground motion models each. The NSHA18 applied a classical probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) using a weighted logic tree approach, where the model weights were determined through two structured expert elicitation workshops. The response from the participants of these workshops was overwhelmingly positive and the participants appreciated the opportunity to contribute towards the model’s development. Since the model’s publication, Geoscience Australia has been able to reflect on the choices made both through the expert elicitation process and through decisions made by the NSHA18 team. The consequences of those choices on the production of the final seismic hazard model may not have been fully appreciated prior to embarking on the development of the NSHA18, nor during the expert elicitation workshops. The development of the NSHA18 revealed several philosophical challenges in terms of characterising seismic hazard in regions of low seismicity such as Australia. Chief among these are: 1) the inclusion of neotectonic faults, whose rupture characteristics are underexplored and poorly understood; 2) processes for the adjustment and conversion of historical earthquake magnitudes to be consistently expressed in terms of moment magnitude; 3) the relative weighting of different seismic-source classes (i.e., background, regional, smoothed seismicity, etc) for different regions of interest and exceedance probabilities; 4) the assignment of Gutenberg-Richter b-values for most seismic source models based on b-values determined from broad neotectonic domains, and; 5) the characterisation and assignment of ground-motion models used for different tectonic regimes. This paper discusses lessons learned through the development of the NSHA18, identifies successes in the expert elicitation and modelling processes, and explores some of the abovementioned challenges that could be reviewed for future editions of the model. Abstract presented at the 17th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (17WCEE )