This is all the available tiles of 50k data

M. Heydari et al Komatiite alteration assemblages in the Kambalda Domain, WA.

The Early Permian to Middle Triassic Bowen and Gunnedah Basins and the Early Jurassic to Early Cretaceous Surat Basin exhibit a complex subsidence history over a period of about two hundred million years. Backstripped tectonic subsidence curves, constructed by removing the effects of processes such as sediment loading, loading due to the water column, and sediment compaction allow the subsidence histories of the basin to be examined in terms of the tectonic drivers that caused the subsidence of the basins. In the Early Permian, rapid subsidence was driven by mechanical extension, forming a series of half grabens along the western margin of the Bowen and Gunnedah Basins. Mechanical extension ceased at about 280 Ma, being replaced by a phase of passive thermal subsidence, resulting in more widespread, uniform sedimentation, with reduced tectonic subsidence rates. At the start of the Late Permian, the passive thermal subsidence phase was interrupted by the onset of lithospheric flexure during a foreland basin phase, driven by convergence and thrust loading to the east in the New England Orogen. Initially, dynamic loading, caused by viscous corner flow in the asthenospheric wedge above the west-dipping subducting plate, led to limited tectonic subsidence. Later in the Late Permian, the dynamic loading was overwhelmed by static loading, caused by the developing retroforeland thrust belt in New England, leading to very high rates of tectonic subsidence, and the development of a major retroforeland basin. Peneplanation in the Late Triassic was followed by sedimentation at the start of the Jurassic, forming the Surat Basin, where the tectonic subsidence can again be interpreted in terms of dynamically-induced platform tilting. Subduction ceased at about 95 Ma, resulting in rapid uplift, due the rebound of the lithosphere following cessation of subduction, or it stepping well to the outboard of Australia.

Archived imagery

Y3 Data base including data from St. Ives, Golden Mile, New Celebration and Hanons Lake

What controls the formation of giant porphyry Cu-Au deposits? A case study of Ok Tedi, Papua New Guinea

This article describes the geology of Northeastern Eyre Peninsula in South Australia, and calls particular attention to the geological significance of a very prominent magnetic intensity contrast that is interpreted to represent the northern extension of the Kalinjala Mylonite Zone.

Applied geodynamics of a world class mineral system: generating regional targets from conceptual/process understanding

The Collaborative East Antarctic Marine Census (CEAMARC) voyage was conducted on the Aurora Australis between December 2007 and January 2008. The voyage was operated as part of the Census of Antarctic Marine Life (CAML) program to document the benthic communities and their associated habitats across the George V Shelf in east Antarctica. Underwater video footage was collected from 22 sites across the shelf using Geoscience Australia's Deep Under Water Camera (DUCII). Transects were run for 15-40 minutes across depths ranging from 140 m to 1200 m. All video footage is stamped with the UTC time. Stations are named according to the CEAMARC station number followed by the instrument used (eg. CAM for camera) and then the deployment number. For example 09CAM05 was deployed at CEAMARC site 9 and was the 5th camera transect. The location and depth of each station is listed below. For further information on this survey please refer to the post-survey report (GA Record 2009/05 - Geocat #67381). Station Depth Longitude Latitude 04CAM04 259.61 141.985220 -66.341583 07CAM07 197.57 142.626933 -66.551262 08CAM06 391.27 142.358735 -66.555997 09CAM05 357.07 142.010337 -66.550603 12CAM21 201.26 140.825277 -66.558158 26CAM22 219.99 140.030193 -66.526848 27CAM01 436.63 142.661085 -65.997597 30CAM02 432.03 143.649810 -65.998757 39CAM08 863.95 142.967960 -66.551365 41CAM09 579.30 142.629580 -66.735847 42CAM10 409.75 142.680007 -66.868050 43CAM11 177.00 143.289108 -66.758878 44CAM12 766.04 143.657790 -66.687152 47CAM13 184.31 144.662358 -67.035295 49CAM14 1175.27 145.209785 -67.031225 50CAM16 593.06 145.258282 -66.746837 51CAM15 537.11 145.490357 -66.750387 57CAM17 639.44 145.009407 -66.741943 58CAM18 844.64 144.655195 -66.748407 59CAM19 912.16 144.329455 -66.744992 61CAM03 657.39 142.983383 -66.322688 63CAM20 429.08 143.002492 -65.862048

This dataset reflects the external boundaries of all native title determination and compensation applications that are currently recognized and active within the Federal Court process. Applications that are non-active (i.e. withdrawn, dismissed, finalised, rejected or combined) are only included as aspatial records for completeness. This is a national dataset with data partitioned by jurisdiction (State), for ease of use. Applications stored for each jurisdiction dataset include applications which overlap into adjoining jurisdictions as well as applications which overlap with these for completeness. This dataset depicts the spatial definition of active Claimant and Non-claimant native title determination applications and compensation applications. Where possible these may include internal boundaries or areas excluded. Aspatial attribution includes National Native Title Tribunal number, Federal Court number, application status and the names of both the NNTT Case Manager and Lead Member where assigned to the application. Applications included on the Schedule of Native Title (Federal Court) include all registered and unregistered applications as well as determined applications that are yet to be finalized.