The Surface Hydrology Points (Regional) dataset provides a set of related features classes to be used as the basis of the production of consistent hydrological information. This dataset contains a geometric representation of major hydrographic point elements - both natural and artificial. This dataset is the best available data supplied by Jurisdictions and aggregated by Geoscience Australia it is intended for defining hydrological features.

Groundwater recharge estimates within the intake beds of the Cadna-owie - Hooray and equivalents aquifer and the Hutton Sandstone aquifer in the Great Artesian Basin. Recharge estimates are given in mm/year and are calculated using chloride mass balance method. Grid cell size (X, Y) = 0.015 DD, 0.015 DD. This GIS data set was produced for the Great Artesian Basin Water Resource Assessment and used in Figures 7.9 of Ransley TR and Smerdon BD (eds) (2012) Hydrostratigraphy, hydrogeology and system conceptualisation of the Great Artesian Basin. A technical report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Great Artesian Basin Water Resource Assessment. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, Australia. This dataset and associated metadata can be obtained from www.ga.gov.au, using catalogue number 76932. For further information, contact: Phil Davies Research Projects Officer CSIRO Land and Water Waite Road Urrbrae SA 5064

This Sydney Basin dataset contains descriptive attribute information for the areas bounded by the relevant spatial groundwater feature in the associated Hydrogeology Index map. Descriptive topics are grouped into the following themes: Location and administration; Demographics; Physical geography; Surface water; Geology; Hydrogeology; Groundwater; Groundwater management and use; Environment; Land use and industry types; and Scientific stimulus. The Sydney Basin, part of the Sydney–Gunnedah–Bowen basin system, consists of rocks dating from the Late Carboniferous to Middle Triassic periods. The basin's formation began with extensional rifting during the Late Carboniferous and Early Permian, leading to the creation of north-oriented half-grabens along Australia's eastern coast. A period of thermal relaxation in the mid Permian caused subsidence in the Bowen–Gunnedah–Sydney basin system, followed by thrusting of the New England Orogen from the Late Permian through the Triassic, forming a foreland basin. Deposition in the basin occurred in shallow marine, alluvial, and deltaic environments, resulting in a stratigraphic succession with syn-depositional folds and faults, mostly trending north to north-east. The Lapstone Monocline and Kurrajong Fault separate the Blue Mountains in the west from the Cumberland Plain in the central part of the basin. The Sydney Basin contains widespread coal deposits classified into geographic coalfield areas, including the Southern, Central, Western, Newcastle, and Hunter coalfields. These coalfields are primarily hosted within late Permian strata consisting of interbedded sandstone, coal, siltstone, and claystone units. The coal-bearing formations are grouped based on sub-basins, namely the Illawarra, Tomago, Newcastle, and Wittingham coal measures, underlain by volcanic and marine sedimentary rocks. Deposition within the basin ceased during the Triassic, and post-depositional igneous intrusions (commonly of Jurassic age) formed sills and laccoliths in various parts of the basin. The maximum burial depths for the basin's strata occurred during the early Cretaceous, reaching around 2,000 to 3,000 metres. Subsequent tectonic activity associated with the Tasman Rift extension in the Late Cretaceous and compressional events associated with the convergence between Australia and Indonesia in the Neogene led to uplift and erosion across the basin. These processes have allowed modern depositional environments to create small overlying sedimentary basins within major river valleys and estuaries, along the coast and offshore, and in several topographic depressions such as the Penrith, Fairfield and Botany basins in the area of the Cumberland Plain.

Freshwater coastal aquifers provide an important resource for irrigated agriculture, human consumption and the natural environment. Approximately 18 million people live within 50 km of the coast in Australia, and many coastal communities are reliant on groundwater. These coastal aquifers are vulnerable to seawater intrusion (SWI) - the landward encroachment of seawater - due to their close proximity to the ocean. To assess the threat of SWI in Australia, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken with input from state/territory agencies. The literature review, in combination with contributions from stakeholders, identified sites within each of the states and the Northern Territory where SWI had been reported or where it was considered to be a serious threat. International Association of Hydrogeologists 2013 Congress poster

This data set comprises one of three archives of Geoscience Australia work in the project "A Consistent Approach to Groundwater Recharge Determination in Data Poor Areas". The project was carried out by CSIRO and Geoscience Australia and was funded by the National Water Commission Raising National Water Standards program. The data contained included Original data sourced for the project, Final data produced by the project, MXD's of maps created, and tools used within the project. The archives created for this project comprise: 1. Data archive. Data set stored in the GA CDS. Geocat Record number 79804 2. Adminstration and publication archive. Documents stored in TRIM Project P10/67 RECHARGE-DISCHARGE PROJECT 3. References archive. Endnote library located at \\nas\eg\water\References\Recharge_Discharge_Project.enl For more information about the creation of these archives, including the location of files, see TRIM D2014-102808 For more information about the project, see the following references: Leaney F, Crosbie R, O'Grady A, Jolly I, Gow L, Davies P, Wilford J and Kilgour P. 2011. Recharge and discharge estimation in data poor areas: Scientific reference guide. CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. 61 pp (GA Record No. 2011/46 GACat # 71941) Jolly I, Gow L, Davies P, O'Grady A, Leaney F, Crosbie R, Wilford J and Kilgour P. 2011. Recharge and discharge estimation in data poor areas: User guide for the recharge and discharge estimation spreadsheets and MapConnect. CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. 40 pp. (GA Record No. 2011/35 GeoCat # 71940) Pain, C.F., Gow, L.J, Wilford, J.R. and Kilgour, P. 2011. Mapping approaches to recharge and discharge estimation and associated input datasets. A report for CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. (Professional Opinion No. 2011/01 GeoCat # 70392)

Coal Seam Gas (CSG) activities will have an impact on groundwater. But what will be the magnitude, extent and timing of that impact? Faced with this question, and in the absence of comprehensive datasets, groundwater professionals are unable to respond with confidence. CSG activities, with some notable exceptions, are mostly carried out in stratigraphic units far below, or at a lateral distance from, those monitored by existing groundwater monitoring networks. How then can groundwater experts advise regulators and industry appropriately as to the likelihood and nature of impacts to groundwater from CSG activities? Commonwealth approval conditions for the development of CSG projects in the Surat Basin are empowered by the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) as it pertains to the protection of Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) including springs that host EPBC-listed threatened species and communities. The projects are approved on the basis that there will be no significant impact to MNES. The approval conditions include the requirement for regional monitoring of groundwater levels and quality for the early detection of impacts to springs. In the absence of sufficient time series data that would support sophisticated modelling, the predictive power of simple groundwater flow calculations, together with regional groundwater models, may be deployed to evaluate the envelope of magnitude, extent and timing of groundwater responses. It is proposed that these same tools may be used to develop both monitoring networks and triggers for remedial action that can adapt to increased data availability and changing production scenarios and take account of the inertia in both the physical response within the groundwater system and the institutional response from either the regulator or industry. This will facilitate the protection of groundwater-dependant ecosystems through timely and adaptive management responses whilst ensuring that CSG projects are neither injudiciously promoted, nor prematurely curtailed, through lack of monitoring data or through misinterpretation of changes in those data. This abstract was developed for the International Association of Hydrogeologists Congress, Perth, 2013 based on work undertaken for Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities.

Geoscience Australia was recently involved in the reconceptualisation of the hydrogeology of the Great Artesian Basin (GAB), as part of the Great Artesian Basin Water Resource Assessment. The project refined the understanding of key hydrostratigraphic units within the GAB. This brochure describes key aquifers in the GAB and is designed to be distributed with samples from the aquifers. Aquifers covered are the Winton-Mackunda, Cadna-owie-Hooray, Adori Sandstone/Springbok Sandstone, Hutton Sandstone and Precipice Sandstone. Brochure prepared for the International Association of Hydrogeologists Congress 2013, Perth, Australia

Islands in the Pacific region rely heavily on their fresh groundwater, and for a number of islands it is the only reliable source of freshwater throughout the year. Stresses on groundwater resources in many Pacific Island countries are set to escalate in the future with projected population and economic growth. In addition, there are likely to be future climate impacts on groundwater availability and quality. Although a number of studies have been undertaken at a local scale, very limited information is available to consider the impacts of future climates on groundwater systems at a regional scale. This project provides a first-pass regional-scale assessment of the relative potential vulnerability of groundwater to: (i) low rainfall periods and (ii) mean sea-level rise for 15 Pacific Island countries and territories. The dataset associated with this report can be obtained from www.ga.gov.au using title "Pacific Island Groundwater Vulnerability to Future Climates Dataset" or catalogue number 81575.

Modelled groundwater levels from 2010 to 2070 used to estimate the impact of climate change and future groundwater resource development on groundwater levels in the Cape York area of the GAB. The modelling considered different scenarios of climate and groundwater development: Scenario A (historical climate and current development); Scenario C (future climate and current development) and Scenario D (future climate and future development). The future climate scenarios included the wet extreme (wet), the median (mid) and the dry extreme (dry). This data set contains spatial data that were created from the outputs from climate change scenario models using on the Cape York groundwater flow model. The subfolder "heads" contains rasters of spatial distributions of hydraulic head for the year 2070 that were output based on projections of future climate and projections of future groundwater extraction (Scenario D). For each climate change scenario there are three outputs: one for each modelled aquifer thickness (100, 150 and 200 metres). The subfolder "differences" contains rasters of differences between the spatial distributions of hydraulic head that were output by future use scenario models and by either (a) the respective "A scenario" model or (b) the respective "Base scenario" model (the modelled hydraulic head for the year 2010). 'No data' value is 1e30 for heads rasters, -9999 for differences rasters Cell size is 5000m x 5000m For more information, please refer to Welsh WD, Moore CR, Turnadge CJ, Smith AJ and Barr TM (2012) "Modelling of climate and groundwater development. A technical report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Great Artesian Basin Water Resource Assessment ". CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, Australia. Projection is Albers equal area conic, with central meridian 143 degrees longitude, standard parallels at -21 and -29 degrees latitude and latitude of projection's origin at -25.

Difference between 'pre-development' (1900-1920) and modern (2000-2010) groundwater levels at selected bore locations in the Great Artesian Basin This GIS data set was produced by CSIRO for the Great Artesian Basin Water Resource Assessment and used in Figure 7.5 of Ransley TR and Smerdon BD (eds) (2012) Hydrostratigraphy, hydrogeology and system conceptualisation of the Great Artesian Basin. A technical report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Great Artesian Basin Water Resource Assessment. CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country Flagship, Australia. This dataset and associated metadata can be obtained from www.ga.gov.au, using catalogue number 76931. For further information contact Phil Davies, Research Projects Officer, CSIRO Land and Water, Waite Road, Urrbrae SA 5064