Geoscience Australia (GA) conducted a marine survey (GA0345/GA0346/TAN1411) of the north-eastern Browse Basin (Caswell Sub-basin) between 9 October and 9 November 2014 to acquire seabed and shallow geological information to support an assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the basin. The survey, undertaken as part of the Department of Industry and Science's National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), aimed to identify and characterise indicators of natural hydrocarbon or fluid seepage that may indicate compromised seal integrity in the region. The survey was conducted in three legs aboard the New Zealand research vessel RV Tangaroa, and included scientists and technical staff from GA, the NZ National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA) and Fugro Survey Pty Ltd. Shipboard data (survey ID GA0345) collected included multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter over 12 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1, M1) totalling 455 km2 in water depths ranging from 90 - 430 m, and 611 km of sub-bottom profile lines. Seabed samples were collected from 48 stations and included 99 Smith-McIntyre grabs and 41 piston cores. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) (survey ID GA0346) collected higher-resolution multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter data, totalling 7.7 km2, along with 71 line km of side scan sonar, underwater camera and sub-bottom profile data. Twenty two Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) missions collected 31 hours of underwater video, 657 still images, eight grabs and one core. This catalogue entry refers to chlorophyll a, b, c and phaeophytin a conentrations in the upper 2 cm of seabed sediments.

Geoscience Australia (GA) conducted a marine survey (GA0345/GA0346/TAN1411) of the north-eastern Browse Basin (Caswell Sub-basin) between 9 October and 9 November 2014 to acquire seabed and shallow geological information to support an assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the basin. The survey, undertaken as part of the Department of Industry and Science's National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), aimed to identify and characterise indicators of natural hydrocarbon or fluid seepage that may indicate compromised seal integrity in the region. The survey was conducted in three legs aboard the New Zealand research vessel RV Tangaroa, and included scientists and technical staff from GA, the NZ National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA) and Fugro Survey Pty Ltd. Shipboard data (survey ID GA0345) collected included multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter over 12 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1, M1) totalling 455 km2 in water depths ranging from 90 - 430 m, and 611 km of sub-bottom profile lines. Seabed samples were collected from 48 stations and included 99 Smith-McIntyre grabs and 41 piston cores. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) (survey ID GA0346) collected higher-resolution multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter data, totalling 7.7 km2, along with 71 line km of side scan sonar, underwater camera and sub-bottom profile data. Twenty two Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) missions collected 31 hours of underwater video, 657 still images, eight grabs and one core. This catalogue entry refers to total sediment metabolism, bulk carbonate and mineral specific surface area measurements, and major and minor trace elements and carbon and nitrogen concentrations and isotopes in the upper 2 cm of seabed sediments.

Geoscience Australia (GA) conducted a marine survey (GA0345/GA0346/TAN1411) of the north-eastern Browse Basin (Caswell Sub-basin) between 9 October and 9 November 2014 to acquire seabed and shallow geological information to support an assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the basin. The survey, undertaken as part of the Department of Industry and Science's National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), aimed to identify and characterise indicators of natural hydrocarbon or fluid seepage that may indicate compromised seal integrity in the region. The survey was conducted in three legs aboard the New Zealand research vessel RV Tangaroa, and included scientists and technical staff from GA, the NZ National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA) and Fugro Survey Pty Ltd. Shipboard data (survey ID GA0345) collected included multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter over 12 areas (A1, A2, A3, A4, A6b, A7, A8, B1, C1, C2b, F1, M1) totalling 455 km2 in water depths ranging from 90 - 430 m, and 611 km of sub-bottom profile lines. Seabed samples were collected from 48 stations and included 99 Smith-McIntyre grabs and 41 piston cores. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) (survey ID GA0346) collected higher-resolution multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter data, totalling 7.7 km2, along with 71 line km of side scan sonar, underwater camera and sub-bottom profile data. Twenty two Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) missions collected 31 hours of underwater video, 657 still images, eight grabs and one core. This catalogue entry refers to porosity, total chlorin and chlorin index data from the upper 2 cm of seabed sediments.

This report details the suitability of two identified sites in the Browse Basin for the geological storage of carbon dioxide: the Carbine Ponded Turbidite and the Leveque Shelf long migration dissolution trap. Detailed site assessments were completed by undertaking detailed geophysical interpretation of the top and base of each site, combined with a comprehensive structural, stratigraphic and sedimentological analysis, in order to construct a series of static 3D reservoir models for each potential storage site. These were submitted for CO2 injection simulation in order to better estimate the potential storage capacity, the potential injectivity volumes, and identify any containment-related issues of each site. Therefore this reports aims to provide technical recommendations regarding the viability of the long-term geological storage of CO2 in the Browse Basin.

As part of the Australian Government National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), Geoscience Australia is undertaking CO2 storage assessment of the Vlaming Sub-basin located offshore Western Australia in the southern Perth Basin. The Vlaming Sub-basin is a Mesozoic depocentre containing up to 14 km of sediments. Close proximity of the basin to industrial polluters in the Perth area dictates the need to find CO2 storage solutions in this basin. The main reservoir unit identified as suitable for storage of CO2 is the Early Cretaceous Gage Sandstone deposited in paleo-topographic lows of the Valanginian breakup unconformity. The reservoir unit is laterally extensive (over 1,500 km2) and over most of the area reasonably thick (100 - 300 m). It lies at depths between 1400 and 2000 m below the seafloor, which is suitable for injection of the supercritical CO2 and makes it an attractive target for the long-term storage. The reservoir unit is overlain by a thick deltaic to shallow marine succession of the South Perth Shale, which represents a regional seal in the area. Carbon Storage taskforce estimated that up 1 GT of CO2 can be stored in the Gage Sandstone. The first assessment of the Vlaming Sub-basin undertaken by CO2CRC focused on evaluation of the reservoir unit and overall storage capacity. The current study is based on interpretation and integration of the seismic, well and marine datasets, both existing and acquired since the previous assessment. It includes detailed analysis of reservoir and seal properties and a comprehensive evaluation of the seal integrity risks to allow a more accurate and realistic modeling for CO2 storage.

This GHGT-12 conference paper hightlights some results of GA's work on "Regional assessment of the CO2 storage potential of the Mesozoic sucession in the Petrel Sub-basin, Northern Territory, Australia. Record 2014/11".

Introduction This National Carbon Infrastructure Plan study assesses the suitability of the Vlaming Sub-basin for CO2 storage. The Vlaming Sub-basin is a Mesozoic depocentre within the offshore southern Perth Basin, Western Australia (Figure 1). It is around 23,000 km2 and contains up to 14 km of sediments. The Early Cretaceous Gage Sandstone was deposited in paleo-topographic lows of the Valanginian breakup unconformity and is overlain by the South Perth Shale regional seal. Together, these formations are the most prospective reservoir/seal pair for CO2 storage. The Gage Sandstone reservoir has porosities of 23-30% and permeabilities of 200-1800 mD. It lies mostly from 1000 - 3000 m below the seafloor, which is suitable for injection of supercritical CO2 and makes it an attractive target as a long-term storage reservoir. Methods & datasets To characterise the Gage reservoir, a detailed sequence stratigraphic analysis was conducted integrating 2D seismic interpretation, well log analysis and new biostratigraphic data (MacPhail, 2012). Paleogeographic reconstructions of components of the Gage Lowstand Systems Tract (LST) are based on seismic facies mapping, and well log and seismic interpretations. Results The Gage reservoir is a low stand systems tract that largely coincides with the Gage Sandstone and is defined by the presence of the lower G. mutabilis dinoflagellate zone. A palynological review of 6 wells led to a significant revision, at the local scale, of the Valanginian Unconformity and the extent of the G. mutabilis dinoflagellate zones (MacPhail, 2012). G. mutabilis dinoflagellates were originally deposited in lagoonal (or similar) environments and were subsequently redeposited in a restricted marine environment via mass transport flows. Mapping of the shelf break indicates that the Gage LST was deposited in water depths of >400 m. Intersected in 8 wells, the Gage LST forms part of a sand-rich submarine fan system (Figure 2) that includes channelized turbidites, low stand fan deposits, debris flows (Table 1). This interpretation is broadly consistent with Spring & Newell (1993) and Causebrook (2006). The Gage LST is thickest (up to 360 m) at the mouth of large canyons adjacent to the Badaminna Fault Zone (BFZ) and on the undulating basin plain west of Warnbro 1 (Figure 1). Paleogeographic maps depict the evolution of the submarine fan system (Figure 3). Sediment transport directions feeding the Gage LST are complex. Unit A is sourced from the northern canyon (Figure 3a). Subsequently, Unit B (Figure 3b) derived sediment from multiple directions including incised canyons adjacent to BFZ and E-W oriented canyons eroding into the Badaminna high. These coalesce on an undulating basin plain west of Warnbro 1. Minor additional input for the uppermost Unit C (Figure 3c) is derived from sources near Challenger 1. Summary 1: The Gage LST is an Early Cretaceous submarine fan system that began deposition during the G. mutabilis dinoflagellate zone. It ranges from confined canyon fill to outer fan deposits on an undulating basin plain. 2: The 3 units within the Gage LST show multidirectional sediment sources. The dominant supply is via large canyons running north-south adjacent to the Badaminna Fault Zone. 3: Seismic facies interpretations and palaeogeographic mapping show that the best quality reservoirs for potential CO2 storage are located in the outer fan (Unit C sub-unit 3) and the mounded canyon fill (Unit A). These are more likely to be laterally connected. 4: The defined units and palaeogeographic maps will be used in a regional reservoir model to estimate the storage capacity of the Gage LST reservoir.

Geoscience Australia is investigating the suitability of offshore sedimentary basins as potential CO2 storage sites. In May 2012 a seabed survey (GA0335/SOL5463) was undertaken in collaboration with the Australian Institute of Marine Science to acquire baseline marine data in the Petrel Sub-basin, Joseph Bonaparte Gulf. The aim was to collect information on possible connections (faults and fluid pathways) between the seabed and key basin units, and to characterise seabed habitats and biota. Two areas were surveyed (Area 1: 471 km2, depth ~ 80-100 m; Area 2: 181 km2, depth ~ 30-70 m), chosen to investigate the seabed over the potential supercritical CO2 boundary (Area 1) and the basin margin (Area 2), with Area 2 located around Flat Top 1 Well. Data analysed include multibeam sonar bathymetry and backscatter, seabed samples and their geochemical and biological properties, video footage and still images of seabed habitats and biota, and acoustic sub-bottom profiles. Pockmarks, providing evidence for fluid release, are present at the seabed, and are particularly numerous in Area 1. Area 1 is part of a sediment-starved, low-relief section of shelf characterised by seabed plains, relict estuarine paleochannels, and low-lying ridges. Facies analysis and radiocarbon dating of relict coastal plain sediment indicates Area 1 was a mangrove-rich environment around 15,500 years ago, transgressed near the end of the Last Glacial period (Meltwater Pulse 1A). Modern seabed habitats have developed on these relict geomorphic features, which have been little modified by recent seabed processes. Seabed habitats include areas of barren and bioturbated sediments, and mixed patches of sponges and octocorals on hardgrounds. In the sub-surface, stacked sequences of northwest-dipping to flat-lying, well-stratified sediments, variably incised by palaeochannels characterise the shallow geology of Area 1. Some shallow faulting through these deposits was noted, but direct linkages between seabed features and deep-seated faults were not observed. Area 2 is dominated by carbonate banks and ridges. Low-lying ridges, terraces and plains are commonly overlain by hummocky sediment of uncertain origin. Pockmarks are present on the margins of banks, and on and adjacent to ridges. Despite the co-location of banks and ridges with major faults at depth, there is a lack of direct evidence for structural connectivity, particularly because of significant acoustic masking in the sub-surface profiles of Area 2. While no direct structural relationship was observed in the acoustic sub-bottom profiles between these banks, ridges and faults visible in the basin seismic profiles, some faults extend through the upper basin units towards the seabed on the margin of Area 2. No evidence was detected at the seabed for the presence of thermogenic hydrocarbons or other fluids sourced from the basin, including beneath the CO2 supercritical boundary. The source of fluids driving pockmark formation in Area 1 is most likely decomposing mangrove-rich organic matter within late Pleistocene estuarine sediments. The gas generated is dominated by CO2. Additional fluids are potentially derived from sediment compaction and dewatering. Conceptual models derived from this are being used to inform regional-scale assessments of CO2 storage prospectivity in the Petrel Sub-basin.

In 2011 as part of the National CO2 Infrastructure Plan (NCIP), Geoscience Australia started a three year project to provide new pre-competitive data and a more detailed assessment of the Vlaming Sub-basin prospectivity for the storage of CO2. Initial assessment by Causebrook 2006 of this basin identified Gage Sandstone and South Perth Shale (SPS) formations as the main reservoir/seal pair suitable for long-term storage of CO2. SPS is a thick (1900 m) deltaic succession with highly variable lithologies. It was estimated that the SPS is capable of holding a column of CO2 of up to 663m based on 6 MICP tests (Causebrook, 2006). The current study found that sealing capacity of the SPS varies considerably across the basin depending on what part of the SPS Supersequence is present at that location. Applying a sequence-stratigraphic approach, the distribution of mudstone facies within the SPS Supersequence, was mapped across the basin. This facies is the effective sub-regional seal of the SPS. Analysis of the spatial distribution and thickness of the effective seal is used for characterisation of the containment potential in the Vlaming Sub-basin CO2 storage assessment.

Covering an area of approximately 247 000km2, the Galilee Basin is a significant feature of central Queensland. Three main depocentres contain several hundred metres of Late Carboniferous to Middle Triassic sediments. Sedimentation in the Galilee Basin was dominated by fluvial to lacustrine depositional systems. This resulted in a sequence of sandstones, mudstones, siltstones, coals and minor tuff in what was a relatively shallow intracratonic basin with little topographic relief. Forty years or more of exploration in the Galilee Basin has failed to discover any economic accumulations of hydrocarbons, despite the presence of apparently fair to very good reservoirs and seals in both the Permian and Triassic sequence. Despite some relatively large distances (upwards of 500km) between sources and sinks, previous and ongoing work on the Galilee Basin suggests that it has potential to sequester a significant amount of Queensland's carbon dioxide emissions. Potential reservoirs include the Early Permian Aramac Coal Measures, the Late Permian Colinlea Sandstone and the Middle Triassic Clematis Sandstone. These are sealed by several intraformational and local seals as well as the regional Triassic Moolayember Formation. With few suitable structural traps and little faulting throughout the Galilee sequence, residual trapping within saline reservoir is the most likely mechanism for storing CO2. The current study is aimed at building a sound geological model of the basin through activities such as detailed mapping, well correlation, and reservoir and seal analysis leading to reservoir simulations to gain a better understanding of the basin.