Exploring for the Future (EFTF) is an Australian Government initiative that gathers new data and information about potential mineral, energy and groundwater resources. Commencing in 2016 with a focus on northern Australia, an EFTF extension to 2024 was recently announced, with expanded coverage across mainland Australia and Tasmania. The EFTF energy component aims to improve our understanding of the petroleum potential of frontier onshore Australian basins and has acquired significant pre-competitive datasets, including the recently drilled Barnicarndy 1 deep stratigraphic well in Western Australia’s Canning Basin (in partnership with the Geological Survey of Western Australia), and NDI Carrara 1 deep stratigraphic well in the South Nicholson region of the Northern Territory (in partnership with the MinEX CRC). These are the first stratigraphic wells drilled in a petroleum basin by Geoscience Australia since the formation in 2001 from its predecessor agencies. Both wells were sited along two-dimensional, deep crustal seismic surveys acquired by Geoscience Australia as part of EFTF, and provide stratigraphic control for the imaged geology. The sedimentary fill intersected by the Barnicarndy 1 and NDI Carrara 1 wells were cored and logged with a broad suite of wireline tools, providing substantial new data in two frontier basins. These data provide insights into regional stratigraphy and local lithology. Geochronology, petrographic, organic and inorganic geochemistry, petrophysical rock properties, petroleum systems elements, palaeontological, and fluid inclusion studies have been undertaken upon which inferences on regional prospectivity can made in these data-poor regions. Moving into the next phase of EFTF, these wells provide a template for new pre-competitive data acquisition by Geoscience Australia, expanding our knowledge of frontier regions making them attractive for new investment and exploration.

The preserved successions from the Mesoproterozoic Era (1600 to 1000 Ma) are a relatively understudied part of Australian geological evolution, especially considering that this era has a greater time span than the entire Phanerozoic. These rocks are mostly known in variably-preserved sedimentary basins overlying Paleoproterozoic or Archean cratons or at the margins of these cratons. Some metamorphosed equivalents occur within the orogens between or marginal to these cratons. Both energy and mineral resources are hosted in Australian Mesoproterozoic basins, including the highly-prospective organic rich shale units within the Beetaloo Sub-basin (Northern Territory), which form part of the Beetaloo Petroleum Supersystem. The primary aim for this record is to provide a consolidated state of knowledge of Australian basins or successions similar in age to that of the Mesoproterozoic Beetaloo Petroleum Supersystem. The findings of this report will assist prioritising future work, through improved geological understanding and resource prospectivity. This report presents an overview of 14 Mesoproterozoic-age sedimentary basins or successions and their current level of understanding, including location, basin architecture, stratigraphy and depositional environments, age constraints and mineral and energy resources. Basins or successions included in this record are unmetamorphosed or metamorphosed to very low-grade conditions. Recommendations are made for future work to address the main knowledge gaps identified from this review. While some of these basins have been the focus of recent intense study and data acquisition, the extent of knowledge varies broadly across basins. All basins reviewed in this record would benefit from further geochemical and geochronological analyses, and stratigraphic study to better understand the timing of depositional events and their correlation with nearby basins. Elucidation of the post-depositional history of alteration, migration of fluids and/or hydrocarbons would facilitate future exploration and resource evaluation.

Exploring for the Future (EFTF) is an Australian Government program led by Geoscience Australia (GA), in partnership with state and Northern Territory governments. The EFTF program (2016-2024) aims to drive industry investment in resource exploration in frontier regions of onshore Australia by providing new precompetitive data and information about their energy, mineral and groundwater resource potential. Under the EFTF program, the Basin Inventory Project undertook a study of petroleum prospectivity of the onshore Eromanga Basin in Queensland and South Australia. Gilmore 1 well in Queensland was selected based on the occurrence of gas and oil shows reported in the well completion report. Sampling of cuttings and cores was done at Geoscience Australia's Petroleum Data Repository in Canberra. Geoscience Australia commissioned a fluid inclusion stratigraphy (FIS) study on the downhole samples. Here, volatile components ostensibly trapped with fluid inclusions are released and analysed revealing the level of exposure of the well section to migrating fluids. Integration of thin section (TS) preparations reveal the extent of gas and fluid trapping within fluid inclusions while microthemometry (MT) gives an estimation of fluid inclusion trapping temperature. For Gilmore 1, FIS analysis was performed on 498 cuttings and 71 cores between 9.1 metres and 4346 metres base depth, together with 22 samples prepared for TS and 4 samples for MT. To support this study, lithostratigraphic tops were compiled by Geoscience Australia. The results of the study are found in the accompanying documents.

Exploring for the Future (EFTF) is an Australian Government program led by Geoscience Australia (GA), in partnership with state and Northern Territory governments. The EFTF program (2016-2024) aims to drive industry investment in resource exploration in frontier regions of onshore Australia by providing new precompetitive data and information about their energy, mineral and groundwater resource potential. Under the EFTF program, the Basin Inventory Project undertook a study of petroleum prospectivity of the onshore Eromanga Basin in Queensland and South Australia. Yongala 1 well in Queensland was selected based on the occurrence of gas and oil shows reported in the well completion report. Sampling of cuttings and cores was done at Geoscience Australia's Petroleum Data Repository in Canberra. Geoscience Australia commissioned a fluid inclusion stratigraphy (FIS) study on the downhole samples. Here, volatile components ostensibly trapped with fluid inclusions are released and analysed revealing the level of exposure of the well section to migrating fluids. Integration of thin section (TS) preparations reveal the extent of gas and fluid trapping within fluid inclusions while microthemometry (MT) gives an estimation of fluid inclusion trapping temperature. For Yongala 1, FIS analysis was performed on 418 cuttings and 52 cores between 15.2 metres and 3104.5 metres base depth, together with 22 samples prepared for TS and 3 samples for MT. To support this study, lithostratigraphic tops were compiled by Geoscience Australia. The results of the study are found in the accompanying documents.

Heavy minerals (HMs) have been used successfully around the world in energy and mineral exploration, yet in Australia no public domain database or maps exist that document the background HM assemblages or distributions. Here, we describe a project that delivers the world’s first continental-scale HM maps. We applied automated mineralogical identification and quantification of the HMs contained in floodplain sediments from large catchments covering most of Australia. The composition of the sediments reflects the dominant rock types in each catchment, with the generally resistant HMs largely preserving the mineralogical fingerprint of their host protoliths through the weathering–transport–deposition cycle. Underpinning this vision was a pilot project, based on 10 samples from the national sediment sample archive, which in 2020 demonstrated the feasibility of a larger, national-scale project. Two tranches of the subsequent national HM dataset, one focusing on a 965,000 km2 region centred on Broken Hill in southeastern Australia, the other focusing on a 950,000 km2 area in northern Queensland and Northern Territory, were released in 2022. In those releases, over 47 million mineral grains were analysed in 411 samples, identifying over 150 HM species. We created a bespoke, cloud-based mineral network analysis (MNA) tool to visualize, explore and discover relationships between HMs as well as between them and geological settings or mineral deposits. We envisage that the Heavy Mineral Map of Australia and MNA tool, when released publicly by the end of 2023, will contribute significantly to mineral prospectivity analysis and modelling, particularly for technology critical elements and their host minerals <b>Citation:</b> Caritat P. de, Walker A.T., Bastrakov E. & McInnes B.I.A., 2023. From The Heavy Mineral Map of Australia: vision, implementation and progress. In: Czarnota, K. (ed.) Exploring for the Future: Extended Abstracts, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/148678

The Exploring for the Future (EFTF) program is an Australian government initiative to boost investment in resource exploration and development in Australia, and is committed to supporting a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of Australians. There are a number of interrelated projects within the EFTF, including the Australia’s Resources Framework (ARF) project. The latter is a continental-scale project aimed at laying the foundations for a national view of Australia’s surface and subsurface geology, to underpin our understanding of the continent’s mineral, energy and groundwater potential. The ARF project involves new, large-scale data acquisition, advances in big data analytics and tailored resource assessments, to support the resource sector, agriculture, remote communities and the environment, and contribute to community safety. As part of ARF, Geoscience Australia has been undertaking studies of Australian basins that are prospective for, or have potential for, basin-hosted base metal mineral systems (Pb-Zn, Co-Cu), as part of the basins module. The first component of this module (2016-2020) investigated the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic greater McArthur Basin system, Northern Territory and western Queensland (Champion et al., 2020 a, b, c; Huston et al. 2020). The 2020-2024 module is focusing on the Neoproterozoic part of the Stuart Shelf region of the Adelaide Superbasin, South Australia. The Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic sedimentary and volcanic sequences of the Mount Isa–McArthur Basin region of Northern Territory and Queensland are host to a range of world class mineral deposits (Hutton et al., 2012) and include the basin-hosted base metal deposits of the North Australian Zinc Belt, the world’s richest belt of zinc deposits (Huston et al., 2006; Large et al., 2005). These syngenetic (and epigenetic) basin-hosted mineral deposits include McArthur River (formerly HYC) and Century lead-zinc (Pb-Zn) deposits, the Walford Creek Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag deposit (Rohrlach et al., 1998; Large et al., 2005; Hutton et al. 2012) and the Redbank Cu deposit (Knutson et al. 1979). The Neoproterozoic sedimentary sequences of the Stuart Shelf, and their continuation into the Torrens Hinge Zone and Adelaide Rift Complex (Adelaide Superbasin), South Australia, are host to, or form an integral part of, a number of, often historically important, deposits, including the first copper mining region in Australia. These include, amongst others, the Kapunda, Mt Gunson, Cattle Grid, MG14, Windabout, Myall Creek, and Emmie Bluff copper deposits (Lambert et al. 1980, 1984, 1985 1987; Knutson et al. 1983; Coda Minerals 2020, 2021). These deposits are hosted within the Neoproterozoic sediments or along the basal unconformity with older Mesoproterozoic clastic sedimentary rocks (Lambert et al. 1987). This report contains reanalysed geochemical data, and associated sample metadata, for legacy samples collected by the Baas Becking laboratories in the 1970’s from deposits and surrounds in the MacArthur Basin and Stuart Shelf region. This includes samples (mafic igneous rocks, mineralised samples and sedimentary rocks) from the Redbank Cu deposit and surrounds in the McArthur Basin, partly documented in Knutson et al. (1979); samples (sediments, mafic igneous rocks including basement volcanic units (Gawler Range Volcanics), and mineralised samples) from the Mt Gunson deposit and surrounds (Mt Gunson-Lake Dutton area) documented in Knutson et al. (1983, 1992); and a small subset of five samples (sediments, variably mineralised) from the Myall Creek prospect, documented in Lambert et al. (1984). The great majority of these samples are from drill core, with the full list of samples analyses and metadata listed in Appendix A and summarised in Table 1. This data release also includes 52 samples from the Killi Killi Hills regions and surrounds, Tanami, Northern Territory (jobno 9004424), collected by the NTGS and GA, and originally analysed, in the early 1990’s and early 2000’s. These samples included a subset of P2O5-Sr-HREE-enriched Gardiner Sandstone samples from the Killi Killi Hills prospect. These samples are not directly related to the basins project but have been included as they were analysed at the same time as the Stuart Shelf and Redbank samples, and they increase the number of samples and the range of rock types analysed, and so help with statistics for QA/QC purposes. All geochemical data are provided in the appendices, listed by batch. The data can be downloaded via the Geoscience Australia EFTF portal (https://portal.ga.gov.au/persona/eftf).

The Groundwater Dependent Waterbodies (GDW) dataset is a subset of the Digital Earth Australia (DEA) Waterbodies product that has been combined with the Bureau of Meteorology’s national Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem (GDE) Atlas to produce surface waterbodies that are known/high potential aquatic GDEs. These aquatic GDEs include springs, rivers, lakes and wetlands. Where known/high potential GDEs intersected a DEA waterbody, the entire DEA waterbody polygon was retained and assigned as a GDW. Additional attributes were added to the waterbody polygons to indicate amount of overlap the waterbody had with the GDE(s) as well as the minimum, mean, median and maximum percentage of time that water has been detected in each GDW relative to the total number of clear observations (1986 to present). This web service will display a variety of layers with spatial summary statistics of the GDW dataset. These provide a first-pass representation of known/high potential aquatic GDEs and their surface water persistence, derived consistently from Landsat satellite imagery across Australia.

The Groundwater Dependent Waterbodies (GDW) dataset is a subset of the Digital Earth Australia (DEA) Waterbodies product that has been combined with the Bureau of Meteorology’s national Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem (GDE) Atlas to produce surface waterbodies that are known/high potential aquatic GDEs. These aquatic GDEs include springs, rivers, lakes and wetlands. Where known/high potential GDEs intersected a DEA waterbody, the entire DEA waterbody polygon was retained and assigned as a GDW. Additional attributes were added to the waterbody polygons to indicate amount of overlap the waterbody had with the GDE(s) as well as the minimum, mean, median and maximum percentage of time that water has been detected in each GDW relative to the total number of clear observations (1986 to present). This web service will display a variety of layers with spatial summary statistics of the GDW dataset. These provide a first-pass representation of known/high potential aquatic GDEs and their surface water persistence, derived consistently from Landsat satellite imagery across Australia.

The Groundwater Dependent Waterbodies (GDW) dataset is a subset of the Digital Earth Australia (DEA) Waterbodies product that has been combined with the Bureau of Meteorology’s national Groundwater Dependent Ecosystem (GDE) Atlas to produce surface waterbodies that are known/high potential aquatic GDEs. These aquatic GDEs include springs, rivers, lakes and wetlands. Where known/high potential GDEs intersected a DEA waterbody, the entire DEA waterbody polygon was retained and assigned as a GDW. Additional attributes were added to the waterbody polygons to indicate amount of overlap the waterbody had with the GDE(s) as well as the minimum, mean, median and maximum percentage of time that water has been detected in each GDW relative to the total number of clear observations (1986 to present). This web service will display a variety of layers with spatial summary statistics of the GDW dataset. These provide a first-pass representation of known/high potential aquatic GDEs and their surface water persistence, derived consistently from Landsat satellite imagery across Australia.

Exploring for the Future (EFTF) is an Australian Government program led by Geoscience Australia (GA), in partnership with state and Northern Territory governments. The EFTF program (2016-2024) aims to drive industry investment in resource exploration in frontier regions of onshore Australia by providing new precompetitive data and information about their energy, mineral and groundwater resource potential. Under the EFTF program, GA’s National Hydrogen Project and in collaboration with Minerals Resources Tasmania (MRT) undertook a study of hydrogen and helium potential of south-east Tasmania with the sampling of cores from Jericho 1 on Bruny Island. This well was selected based on the availability of core and historic reports of hydrogen-rich natural gases from this well and petroleum exploration wells in the region. Sampling of cores was done at MRT’s Core Repository in Hobart. Geoscience Australia commissioned a fluid inclusion stratigraphy (FIS) study on the downhole samples. Here, volatile components ostensibly trapped with fluid inclusions are released and analysed revealing the level of exposure of the well section to migrating fluids. Integration of thin section (TS) preparations reveal the extent of gas and fluid trapping within fluid inclusions while microthemometry (MT) gives an estimation of fluid inclusion trapping temperature. For Jericho 1, FIS analysis was performed on 179 cores between 87 m and 640.6 m base depth, together with 7 samples prepared for TS and 1 sample for MT. To support this study, lithostratigraphic tops were compiled by MRT. The results of the study are found in the accompanying documents.