The GEOPHYS_SURV database describes geophysical surveys (air, land, and marine), the datasets derived from those surveys, and the methods used for delivery of those datasets. The database includes metadata for all surveys conducted or managed by Geoscience Australia and its predecessor agencies, as well as data and surveys from State and Territory geological survey agencies.

Drilling in the Geoscience Australia Exploring for the Future East Tennant project was conducted as part of the MinEx CRC National Drilling Initiative. Ten stratigraphic boreholes were drilled for scientific purposes in the region around the Barkly Roadhouse in the Northern Territory. Where possible, the boreholes were comprehensively wireline logged to obtain petrophysical data on the cover and basement rocks to help improve knowledge and geophysical models of the region. Formation density data obtained by wireline logging were validated using laboratory-based bulk density data obtained by Archimedes method on diamond drill core samples at Geoscience Australia. Results of the validation show that wireline-logged formation density data and Archimedes wet bulk density data are in good general agreement in the first five boreholes drilled (NDIBK01, NDIBK02, NDIBK03, NDIBK04 and NDIBK05). Difficult drilling and some lost drilling equipment meant that boreholes NDIBK06, NDIBK07 and NDIBK09 could not be cased properly, or could not be re-entered, and thus formation density wireline logs could not be obtained in these holes. Boreholes NDIBK08 and NDIBK10 were wireline logged, however formation density results from these last two holes were problematic. Wireline formation density results for borehole NDIBK08 are shown to be too high due to miscalibration of the wireline formation density tool, and results from borehole NDIBK10 cannot be robustly assessed because of a lack of sufficient Archimedes bulk density data needed to provide statistical relevance and validate the wireline formation density data.

Geoscience Australia first sought feedback on a metadata standard for magnetotelluric (MT) time-series data in 2018 with the publication of a Preview article (Kirkby, 2019) outlining suggestions for metadata fields that should be collected when running an MT survey. This was the first step in standardising the MT formats used by the Australian MT community to ensure a cohesive community approach moving forward. Intrepid Geophysics was subsequently contracted by Geoscience Australia to investigate the current community sentiment around a metadata standard and report on the community’s requirements for a standardised data format. Intrepid Geophysics was chosen as an independent party that had no significant stake in the magnetotellurics discussion. This report is the third made to Geoscience Australia in a series investigating the needs of the Australian magnetotelluric community, with a focus on the definition of the metadata that should be collected along with the raw data of an MT survey. The findings were collated from interviews conducted in the preliminary stage of the project as well as an online questionnaire that was sent to those who had agreed to be contacted. Feedback was constructive, centring on standardisation of parameter naming schemes, adding parameters that were missing and could add value, and misclassification of parameters. Future work should focus on a more widespread community engagement program that involves system manufacturers as well as building the metadata structure around the chosen data format.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance data may be used to estimate physical properties such as water content, NMR relaxation time, and porosity of formations penetrated by boreholes. These data were acquired as part of the Exploring for the Future (EFTF) program at field sites within the East Kimberley and Southern Stuart Corridor field areas.

Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program provides precompetitive information to inform decision-making by government, community and industry on the sustainable development of Australia's mineral, energy and groundwater resources. By gathering, analysing and interpreting new and existing precompetitive geoscience data and knowledge, we are building a national picture of Australia’s geology and resource potential. The Paleo to Mesoproterozoic Birrindudu Basin is an underexplored frontier basin located in northwestern Northern Territory and northeastern Western Australia. The Birrindudu Basin is a region of focus for the second phase of the EFTF program (2020–2024) as it contains strata of similar age to the prospective McArthur Basin, South Nicholson region and Mount Isa Province, but remains comparatively poorly understood. Geoscience Australia (in collaboration with the Northern Territory Geological Survey) acquired around 700 line-kms of deep crustal reflection seismic data across northwest Northern Territory encompassing not only the frontier Birrindudu Basin but adjacent highly prospective regions, such as the Tanami. This ecat record releases the final survey route shapefiles, noting that some segments were not acquired due to site access restrictions. Seismic field data will be published in the near future release following completion of in-house QA/QC protocols

This package contains Airborne Electromagnetic (AEM) data from the regional survey flown over the Great Artesian Basin intake beds in Queensland, Australia in May-June 2021. A total of 4,612.3 line km of transient EM and magnetic data were acquired. The projected grid coordinates have been supplied in GD2020 / MGA Zone 55. The aim of the survey is to provide geophysical information to support investigations of the regional groundwater system and to better understand the architecture of the aquifers within the upper few hundred metres of the GAB intake beds. It will provide data to allow for the study of the following at a reconnaissance scale: a) trends in regolith thickness and variability b) variations in bedrock conductivity c) conductivity of key bedrock (lithology related) conductive units under cover d) the groundwater resource potential of the region Geoscience Australia (GA) flew the survey as part of the Great Artesian Basin (GAB) Project. The Australian Government, through the National Water Infrastructure Fund – Expansion, commissioned GA to undertake the GAB project. The project is led by GA, in collaboration with the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment; Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications; the Bureau of Meteorology; and state and territory government water agencies across Queensland, South Australia, New South Wales and the Northern Territory.

<p>Various gridded images were produced from the NTGS Tanami Region Airborne Magnetic and Radiometric Survey dataset and simultaneously merged into a single grid file. The final grid retains all of the information from the input data and is levelled to the national map compilations produced by Geoscience Australia. <p>The following merged grids are available in this download: <p>• Laser-derived digital elevation model grids (m). Height relative to the Australian Height Datum. <p>• Radar-derived digital elevation model grids (m). Height relative to the Australian Height Datum. <p>• Total magnetic intensity grid (nT). <p>• Total magnetic intensity grid with variable reduction to the pole applied (nT). <p>• Total magnetic intensity grid with variable reduction to the pole and first vertical derivative applied (nT/m). <p>• NASVD-filtered potassium concentration grid (%). <p>• NASVD-filtered thorium concentration grid (ppm). <p>• NASVD-filtered uranium concentration grid (ppm).

<p>Seawater intrusion (SWI) has become a serious threat to many groundwater resources in the last decades, especially in the areas of overexploitation due to population increase, or agriculture use. Significant attention was therefore brought to this complex groundwater problem in order to improve management of these affected aquifers. <p>Due to the high conductivity of seawater, SWI is a good target for many geophysical electromagnetic methods, such as airborne electromagnetic (AEM) or direct current resistivity methods. Airborne collected data are able to map extensive areas, and thus map the extent of SWI on a large scale along the coastlines. <p>However, zooming into a smaller scale, a discrepancy is often found between geophysical estimates and groundwater borehole data, due to different resolution, data sensitivity and also quality of geophysical and groundwater data. Numerous synthetic studies have shown the benefit of approaching the problem by evaluating both types of data in somewhat jointly manner. Research in combining the field geophysical and groundwater data for SWI cases is however very limited. <p>In this contribution we look at the AEM survey in Keep river, NT. It is a dense line survey with spacing of 100m, collected by SKyTEM 312 system for Geoscience Australia. Due to the character of AEM methods, the estimation of 3D (or 2D) subsurface conductivity is mathematically an ill-posed problem, giving multiple “equally good” models (here soil bulk conductivity) with the same data misfit. <p>The borehole data from this area together with geological mapping provide limited (1D) but valuable information about the seawater intrusion location and extent. We applied this “a priori” information coming from direct groundwater data to invert the selected lines of AEM data to obtain estimates that fit well the geophysical data but are also plausible with regard to geology and groundwater chemistry data.

<p>The accompanying data package, was released on 30 April 2020 by the Geological Survey of New South Wales (GSNSW) and Geoscience Australia (GA). <p>The package contains processed data from the “MinEx CRC Cobar Airborne Electromagnetic Survey” that was flown over the Cobar–Lake Cargelligo area of Central West New South Wales . The regional survey was flown at 2.5 and 5 km nominal line spacings and entails approximately 5,900 line kilometres of new geophysical data. The survey was flown in 2019 by New Resolution Geophysics Pty. Ltd. (NRG) using the XCITE® airborne electromagnetic system. NRG also processed the data. <p>The survey also included a further 800 line kilometres of infill flying that was funded by private exploration companies, in certain blocks within the survey area. The data from these infill blocks are not part of this data release due to confidentiality agreements but will be released to the public after a 12 month moratorium. <p>GSNSW commissioned the survey as part of the MinEx Cooperative Research Centre’s (MinEx CRC), the world’s largest mineral exploration collaboration. It brings together industry, government, research organisations and universities to further our understanding of geology, mineral deposits and groundwater resources in areas where rocks aren’t exposed at Earth’s surface. GSNSW is a major participant in the NDI program, committing $16 million to the program over 10 years. In NSW, the program focuses on five areas in the state’s central and far west, where metallic minerals potentially exist under a layer of younger barren geology. These areas are North Cobar, South Cobar, Broken Hill (Mundi), Forbes and Dubbo. <p>GA managed the survey data acquisition and processing contract and the quality control of the survey on behalf of GSNSW. GA also contributed by generating one of the two inversion products included in the data package. <p>The data release package comntains <p>1. A data release package summary PDF document. <p>2. The survey logistics and processing report and XCITE® system specification files <p>3. ESRI shape files for the flight lines and boundary <p>4. KML (Google Earth) files of the flight lines <p>5. Final processed point located line data in ASEG-GDF2 format -final processed dB/dt electromagnetic, magnetic and elevation data -final processed BField electromagnetic, magnetic and elevation data <p>6. Conductivity estimates generated by NRG’s inversion -point located line data output from the inversion in ASEG-GDF2 format -graphical (PDF) multiplot conductivity sections and profiles for each flight line -graphical (JPEG) conductivity sections for each line -georeferenced (PNG) conductivity sections (suitable for pseudo-3D display in a 2D GIS) -GoCAD™ S-Grid 3D objects (suitable for various 3D packages) -Curtain image conductivity sections (suitable 3D display in GA’s EarthSci) -Grids generated from the NRG inversion in ER Mapper® format (layer conductivities, depth slices, elevation slices) -Images generated from the grids above (layer conductivities, depth slices, elevation slices) <p>7. Conductivity estimates generated by Geoscience Australia's inversion -point located line data output from the inversion in ASEG-GDF2 format -graphical (JPEG) conductivity sections for each line -georeferenced (PNG) conductivity sections (suitable for pseudo-3D display in a 2D GIS) -GoCAD™ S-Grid 3D objects (suitable for various 3D packages) -Curtain image conductivity sections (suitable 3D display in GA’s EarthSci) -Grids generated from Geoscience Australia's inversion in ER Mapper® format (layer conductivities, depth slices, elevation slices) -Images generated from the grids above (layer conductivities, depth slices, elevation slices) <p>Directory structure <p>├── report <p>│   ├── line_data <p>│   ├── shapefiles <p>│   ├── kml <p>│   ├── contractor_inversion <p>│   │   ├── line_data <p>│   │   ├── multiplots <p>│   │   ├── sections <p>│   │   ├── georeferenced_sections <p>│   │   ├── gocad_sgrids <p>│   │   ├── earthsci <p>│   │   │   └── MinExCRC_Cobar_AEM_Contractor_Regional <p>│   │   ├── images <p>│   │   │   ├── layers <p>│   │   │   ├── depth_slice <p>│   │   │   └── elevation_slice <p>│   │   └── grids <p>│   │   ├── layers <p>│   │   ├── depth_slice <p>│   │   └── elevation_slice <p>│   └── ga_inversion <p>│   ├── line_data <p>│   ├── sections <p>│   ├── georeferenced_sections <p>│   ├── gocad_sgrids <p>│   ├── earthsci <p>│   │   └── MinExCRC_Cobar_AEM_GA-Inversion_Regional <p>│   ├── images <p>│   │   ├── layers <p>│   │   ├── depth_slice <p>│   │   └── elevation_slice <p>│   └── grids <p>│   ├── layers <p>│   ├── depth_slice <p>│   └── elevation_slice

This data collection is comprised of radiometric (gamma-ray spectrometric) surveys acquired across Australia by Commonwealth, State and Northern Territory governments and the private sector with project management and quality control undertaken by Geoscience Australia. The radiometric method measures naturally occurring radioactivity arising from gamma-rays. In particular, the method is able to identify the presence of the radioactive isotopes potassium (K), uranium (U) and thorium (Th). The measured radioactivity is then converted into concentrations of the radioelements K, U and Th in the ground. Radiometric surveys have a limited ability to see into the subsurface with the measured radioactivity originating from top few centimetres of the ground. These surveys are primarily used as a geological mapping tool as changes in rock and soil type are often accompanied by changes in the concentrations of the radioactive isotopes of K, U and Th. The method is also capable of directly detecting mineral deposits. For example, K alteration can be detected using the radiometric method and is often associated with hydrothermal ore deposits. Similarly, the method is also used for U and Th exploration, heat flow studies, and environmental mapping purposes such as characterising surface drainage features. The instrument used in radiometric surveys is a gamma-ray spectrometer. This instrument measures the number of radioactive emissions (measured in counts per second) and their energies (measured in electron volts (eV)). Radiometric data are simultaneously acquired with magnetic data during airborne surveys and are a non-invasive method for investigating near-surface geology and regolith.