We measured the light absorption properties of two naturally occurring Australian hydrocarbon oils, a Gippsland light crude oil and a North West Shelf light condensate. Using these results in conjunction with estimated sensor environmental noise thresholds, the theoretical minimum limit of detectability of each oil type (as a function of oil thickness) was calculated for both the hyperspectral HYMAP and multispectral Quickbird sensors. The Gippsland crude oil is discernable at layer thickness of 20 micro metres or more in the Quickbird green channel. The HYMAP sensor was found to be theoretically capable of detecting a layer of Gippsland crude oil with a thickness of 10 micro metres in approximately six sensor channels. By contrast, the North West Shelf light condensate was not able to be detected by either sensor for any thickness up to 200 icro metres. Optical remote sensing is therefore not applicable for detecting diagnostic absorption features associated with this light condensate oil type, which is considered representative for the prospective Australian Northwest Shelf area. We conclude that oil type is critical to the applicability of optical remote sensing for natural oil slick detection and identification. We recommend that a sensor- and oil-specific sensitivity study should be conducted prior to applying optical remote sensors for oil exploration. The oil optical properties were obtained using two different laboratory methods, a reflectance-based approach and transmittance-based approach. The reflectance-based approach was relatively complex to implement, but was chosen in order to replicate as closely as possible real world remote sensing measurement conditions of an oil film on water. The transmittance-based approach, based upon standard laboratory spectrophotometric measurements was found to generate results in good agreement with the reflectance-based approach. Therefore, for future oil- and sensor-specific sensitivity studies, we recommend the relatively accessible transmittance-based approach, which is detailed in this paper.

Disaster management is most effective when it is based on evidence. Evidence-based disaster management means that decision makers are better informed, and the decision making process delivers more rational, credible and objective disaster management outcomes. To achieve this, fundamental data needs to be translated into information and knowledge, before it can be put to use by the decision makers as policy, planning and implementation. Disaster can come in all forms: rapid and destructive like earthquakes and tsunamis, or gradual and destructive like drought and climate change. Tactical and strategic responses need to be based on the appropriate information to minimise impacts on the community and promote subsequent recovery. This implies a comprehensive supply of information, in order to establish the direct and indirect losses, and to establish short and long term social and economic resilience. The development of the National Exposure Information System (NEXIS) is a significant national project being undertaken by Geoscience Australia (GA). NEXIS collects, collates, manages and provides the information required to assess multi-hazard impacts. Exposure information may be defined as a suite of information relevant to all those involved in a natural disaster, including the victims, the emergency services, and the policy and planning instrumentalities.

In a collaborative effort with the regional sub-commissions within IAG sub-commission 1.3 'Regional Reference Frames', the IAG Working Group (WG) on 'Regional Dense Velocity Fields' (see http://epncb.oma.be/IAG) has made a first attempt to create a dense global velocity field. GNSS-based velocity solutions for more than 6000 continuous and episodic GNSS tracking stations, were proposed to the WG in reply to the first call for participation issued in November 2008. The combination of a part of these solutions was done in a two-step approach: first at the regional level, and secondly at the global level. Comparisons between different velocity solutions show an RMS agreement between 0.3 mm/yr and 0.5 mm/yr resp. for the horizontal and vertical velocities. In some cases, significant disagreements between the velocities of some of the networks are seen, but these are primarily caused by the inconsistent handling of discontinuity epochs and solution numbers. In the future, the WG will re-visit the procedures in order to develop a combination process that is efficient, automated, transparent, and not more complex than it needs to be.

Geoscience Australia conducted a marine mapping survey between October 2008 and January 2009 to document the seabed environments and sub-surface geology of the Zeewyck, Houtman and Exmouth sub-basins and the deep-water Wallaby (Cuvier) Plateau, in Western Australia. The seabed mapping survey was the second and largest mapping survey of the Commonwealth Government's Offshore Energy Security Program. The survey documented seabed environments using multibeam sonar and sub-bottom profiler data, and characterised benthic habitats and biota from towed video footage and seabed samples. Preliminary analysis indicates that the seabed of the three sub-basins comprises carbonate mud that supports relatively sparse infaunal assemblages, while the numerous submarine canyons that incise the basins are characterised by steep rock walls that support sparse assemblages of suspension feeding organisms, such as sponges and gorgonians. Three volcanic (basaltic) peaks on the upper slopes of the sub-basins (rising 200 m above the seabed) were also mapped and surveyed, with relic coral communities recorded within their sediments. Data collected from the survey are being analysed in conjunction with existing environmental data to describe the key seabed habitats and biota for the offshore basins through a series of environmental summaries that will be made available to support future acreage release in the sub-basins. This research was undertaken concurrent to a regional 2D seismic survey to provide a broader understanding of the region. The environmental summaries of these and other Australian Frontier regions will be available to support future acreage release as part of the Offshore Energy Security Program.

Mafic and ultramafic rocks hosted by metamorphosed deep marine sediments in the Glenelg River Complex of SE Australia comprise variably tectonised fragments of a late Neoproterozoic-earliest Cambrian hyper-extended continental margin that was dismembered and thrust westward over the adjacent continental margin during the Cambro-Ordovician Delamerian-Ross Orogeny. Ultramafic rocks include serpentinised harzburgite of inferred subcontinental lithospheric origin that had already been exhumed at the seafloor before sedimentation commenced whereas mafic rocks exhibit mainly E- and N-MORB basaltic compositions consistent with emplacement into a deep marine environment floored by little if any continental crust. Contrary to previous suggestions, these rocks and their metasedimentary host rocks are not a more distal correlative of the Cambrian Kanmantoo Group. The latter is host to basaltic rocks with higher degrees of crustal contamination and a detrital zircon population with a prominent peak at 500-600 Ma. Except for quartz greywacke in the uppermost part of the sequence, the Glenelg River Complex is devoid of detrital zircon, pointing to deep marine sedimentation far removed from any continental margin. Deep seismic reflection data support the idea that the Glenelg River Complex is underlain by a substrate of mafic and ultramafic rocks and preclude earlier interpretations based on aeromagnetic data that the continental margin hosts a thick pile of seaward-dipping basaltic flows analogous to those developed along volcanic margins in the North Atlantic.

Uluru (Ayers Rock) and Kata Tjuta (Mount Olga) are two of Australia's best-known landmarks, and thousands of people visit them each year. Geoscience Australia is preparing a new edition of 'Uluru & Kata Tjuta: a geological history' (Sweet et al in prep), which will include a new solid-geology map and cross-sections based on outcrop information, the results of drilling of more than 200 water bores in the 1970s by the Northern Territory Government, and interpretation of aeromagnetic data collected in 1988 by the Northern Territory Geological Survey.

Magnetic, gamma-ray and gravity data sets provide vital information for mineral and petroleum explorers as well as researchers studying the geology of the Australian continent. Commonwealth and State and Territory governments have devoted considerable resources to acquiring these data sets and making them available to encourage exploration. Geoscience Australia's geophysical databases contain data acquired by governments, and this report summarises coverages over Australia of these data. On the occasion of the centenary issue of Preview, it is worth reflecting on the advances in the coverage of publicly available magnetic, gamma-ray and gravity data over Australia since the first edition of Preview in February 1986. Since then the areas and resolution of coverages have increased dramatically. Quality of the data through better acquisition and processing techniques has also improved, and new types of data sets added to the explorers' supplies.

Obtaining reliable predictions of the subsurface will provide a critical advantage for explorers seeking mineral deposits at depth and beneath cover. A common approach in achieving this goal is to use deterministic property-based inversion of potential field data to predict a 3D subsurface distribution of physical properties that explain measured gravity or magnetic data. Including all prior geological knowledge as constraints on the inversion ensures that the recovered predictions are consistent with both the geophysical data and the geological knowledge. Physical property models recovered from such geologically-constrained inversion of gravity and magnetic data provide a more reliable prediction of the subsurface than can be obtained without constraints. The non-uniqueness of inversions of potential field data mandates careful and consistent parameterization of the problem to ensure realistic solutions.

Geophysical data were acquired by Australia and Japan from 1994-2002 on the deep-water continental margin offshore from Queen Mary Land, East Antarctica in the general locality of Bruce Rise. This paper presents a regional interpretation of these data and outlines the tectonic history.

part page item. This article discusses the International Stratigraphic Guidelines and Australian practices relating to stratigraphic unit names, when there is a change to the name of the geographic feature that the unit is named after. Australian examples demonstrate both the advice of the Stratigraphic Guidelines not to change the unit name, and a particular case where it was more appropriate to change the unit name for local reasons.