Geoscience Australia marine reconnaissance survey TAN0713 to the Lord Howe Rise offshore eastern Australia was completed as part of the Federal Government¿s Offshore Energy Security Program between 7 October and 22 November 2007 using the New Zealand Government¿s research vessel Tangaroa. The survey was designed to sample key, deep-sea environments on the east Australian margin (a relatively poorly-studied shelf region in terms of sedimentology and benthic habitats) to better define the Capel and Faust basins, which are two major sedimentary basins beneath the Lord Howe Rise. Samples recovered on the survey contribute to a better understanding of the geology of the basins and assist with an appraisal of their petroleum potential. They also add to the inventory of baseline data on deep-sea sediments in Australia. The principal scientific objectives of the survey were to: (1) characterise the physical properties of the seabed associated with the Capel and Faust basins and Gifford Guyot; (2) investigate the geological history of the Capel and Faust basins from a geophysical and geological perspective; and (3) characterise the abiotic and biotic relationships on an offshore submerged plateau, a seamount, and locations where fluid escape features were evident. This dataset comprises total oxygen uptake and total carbon fluxes from core incubation experiments. Some relevant publications which pertain to these datasets include: 1. Heap, A.D., Hughes, M., Anderson, T., Nichol, S., Hashimoto, T., Daniell, J., Przeslawski, R., Payne, D., Radke, L., and Shipboard Party, (2009). Seabed Environments and Subsurface Geology of the Capel and Faust basins and Gifford Guyot, Eastern Australia ¿ post survey report. Geoscience Australia, Record 2009/22, 166pp. 2. Radke, L.C. Heap, A.D., Douglas, G., Nichol, S., Trafford, J., Li, J., and Przeslawski, R. 2011. A geochemical characterization of deep-sea floor sediments of the northern Lord Howe Rise. Deep Sea Research II 58: 909-921

Submarine canyons have been recognised as areas of significant ecological and conservation value. In Australia, 713 canyons were mapped and classified in terms of their geomorphic properties. Many of them are identified as Key Ecological Features (KEFs) and protected by Commonwealth Marine Reserves (CMRs) using expert opinion based on limit physical and ecological information. The effectiveness of these KEFs and CMRs to include ecologically significant submarine canyons as prioritised conservation areas needs to be objectively examined. This study used two local-based spatial statistical techniques, Local Moran's I (LMI) and the Gi* statistic, to identify hotspots of Australian canyons (or unique canyons) for conservation priority. The hotspot analysis identified 29 unique canyons according to their physical attributes that have ecological relevance. Most of these unique physical canyons are distributed on the southern margins. Twenty-four of the 29 canyons are enclosed by the existing KEFs and protected by CMRs to varied extents. In addition, the hotspot analysis identified 79 unique canyons according to their chlorophyll a concentrations, all of which are located in the South-east marine planning region. The findings can be used to update or revise the profile descriptions for some existing KEFs. In future, if the boundaries of these KEFs are deemed necessary to be reviewed, the new information and knowledge could also be used to enhance the conservation priorities of these KEFs.

Acoustic remote sensing is the only effective technique to investigate deep sea bottom. Modern high-frequency multibeam echosounders transmit and receive backscatter signals from hundreds of narrow-angle beams which enlighten small footprints on the seabed. They can produce bathymetry and backscatter data with a spatial resolution around 2% of water depth, which enables us to map the seabed with great detail and accuracy. After calibration, the backscatter intensity is largely controlled by three seabed physical properties: the acoustic impedance contrast (often called hardness), apparent interface roughness (relative to acoustic frequency) and volume inhomogeneity [3, 4, 7]. These seabed physical properties are directly related to sediment grain size characteristics at the sedimentary areas. Studies showed that backscatter intensity had a moderate and positive correlation with sediment mean grain size [1, 3, 6]. Also, backscatter intensity was found to be positively correlated with coarse fractions and inversely correlated with finer fractions [2, 5, 6]. Other sediment grain size properties, especially sorting may also play important roles in the backscatter-sediment relationship [3, 5, 6]. The backscatter-sediment relationship, however, is complex in nature. Research is needed to better understand how acoustic sound interacts with sediment. This study aims to explore this relationship using a set of high quality sediment and multibeam backscatter data, and a robust spatial modelling technique. The co-located sediment and multibeam data were collected from four different areas of Australian margin which represent different sedimentary environments. Five hundred sixty-four sediment grab samples were taken from these survey areas. They were analysed in laboratory using the same procedure to generate grain size properties of %gravel, %sand, %mud, mean grain size, sorting, skewness and kurtosis. The multibeam data were collected using Kongsberg's 300 kHz EM3002 system. The raw multibeam backscatter was processed using the CMST-GA MB Process v8.11.02.1 software developed by Geoscience Australia and the Centre for Marine Science and Technology at Curtin University of Technology. As a result, the backscatter mosaics from incidence angles of 1o to 60o, at an interval of 1o, were generated. The backscatter intensity values from these 60 incidence angles were extracted for all of the sediment samples. The machine learning model Random Forest Decision Tree (RFDT) was used to investigate the backscatter-sediment relationship. The seven sediment grain size properties were the explanatory variables. The response variable was the backscatter intensity from each incidence angle. The model performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. For incidence angles between 1o and 42o, the RFDT models achieved fairly good performance, with a percentage of variance explained around 70% (Figure 1). The model performance gradually decreased for the outer beam range (incidence angle > 42o). Mud content was consistently identified as the most important explanatory variable to the backscatter strength. The second most important explanatory was usually sediment mean grain size. The RFDT models were also able to generate predicted response curves to quantitatively investigate the relationships between the important explanatory variables and individual response variables. The predicted relationship between %mud and the acoustic backscatter intensity is shown in Figure 2. This indicates a negative but non-linear relationship, with the increase of mud content in the sediment, the backscatter intensity decreases. This finding is consistent with that of previous studies [2, 5, 6]. Fine sediment with high mud content not only is soft (e.g., low impedence contrast) but also has high acoustic penetration (e.g., high attenudation in sediment), which naturally incurs low backcatter return

Geoscience Australia completed an underwater towed video survey (GA survey 0338) of the Shelf Rocky Reefs Key Ecological Feature (KEF) in the vicinity of the Solitary Islands in collaboration with the New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage on the R.V. Bombora between 7 - 16 August 2012. The aim of the survey was to characterize benthic habitat in areas of the KEF, and to compare and contrast the effectiveness of different methods for capturing visual representations of biological communities. The survey collected forward-facing mono video, forward-facing stereo video, and downward facing stills along 12 transects, each of 2 km length. The geographic position of the vessel was determined using a GPS system, and the location of the towed camera body was recorded using a USBL system. The KEF survey was part of the National Marine Biodiversity Hub's National Monitoring Evaluation and Reporting Theme. The aim of this theme is to develop a blueprint for the sustained monitoring of the Commonwealth Marine Reserve Network, specifically; 1) to contribute to an inventory of demersal and epibenthic conservation values in the KEF and; 2) to test methodologies and deployment strategies in order to inform future survey design efforts. Embargo statement: Resource embargoed pending completion of NERP research. Release date 31 December 2014 Attribution statement: Users of NERP Marine Biodiversity Hub data are required to clearly acknowledge the source of the material in the format: "Data was sourced from the NERP Marine Biodiversity Hub" the Marine Biodiversity Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government's National Environmental Research Program (NERP), administered by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPaC)." Dataset name: National Environmental Research Program (NERP) Marine Biodiversity Hub, 2012, Flinders Commonwealth Marine Reserve Shelf Backscatter

Fisheries groups worldwide are concerned that seismic operations negatively affect catch rates within a given area, although there is a lack of field-based scientific evidence. In southeast Australia, marine seismic surveys have been blamed for mass mortalities of benthic invertebrates including the commercial scallop Pecten fumatus. Geoscience Australia conducted a 2-D seismic survey in this region in April 2015, thereby presenting an opportunity to conduct field-based experiments investigating the potential impacts on marine organisms. Moored hydrophones recorded noise before and during the seismic survey. An Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of seafloor images to support scallop monitoring. In addition, more traditional sampling was undertaken using a commercial scallop dredge from which a variety of biological and biochemical variables were analysed. The AUVs and dredge were deployed at three time periods (before the seismic survey, 2 months after seismic operations ceased, 10 months after seismic operations ceased), although poor-quality AUV images acquired before the survey precluded the analysis of these data. The highest sound exposure level recorded by the hydrophones was 146 dB re 1 µPa2s at 51 m water depth, at a distance of 1.4 km from the airguns. Commercial scallops were not abundant in the study area, and analysis of AUV images revealed no differences in commercial scallop types (live, clapper, dead shell, other) between experimental and control zones. Similarly, analysis of dredged scallops shows no detectable impact due to seismic activity on shell size, meat size and condition, gonad size and condition, and biochemical indices. Both AUV and dredging data showed strong spatial patterns, with significant differences between sites. Our study confirms previous work showing no evidence of immediate mortality on scallops in the field, and it expands this to include no evidence of long-term or sub-lethal effects. Negative impacts are currently confined to laboratory settings with unrealistic sound exposures. If short-term effects are investigated, we recommend a focus on the underlying mechanisms of potential impacts (i.e. physiological responses), rather than gross metrics such as mortality or size. Physiological responses to airgun sound may not be as immediately obvious as mortality or behavioural responses, but they are equally important to provide early indications of negative effects, as well as to explain the underlying mechanisms behind mortality events and reduced catch.

Submarine canyons are recognised as having an influence on oceanographic processes, sediment transport, productivity and benthic biodiversity from the shelf to the slope. However, not all canyons are the same and the relative importance of an individual canyon will, in part, be determined by its form, shape and position on the continental margin. Here we present an analysis of these parameters using an updated national dataset of 713 submarine canyons for the margin of mainland Australia. Attribute data for each canyon is used to classify them into canyon types across a hierarchy of canyon physical characteristics for shelf-incised and slope-confined (blind) canyons. At each level on the hierarchy, large groupings of canyons are identified that represent common sets of characteristics. The spatial distribution of canyons on the Australian margin is not regular, with clusters located in the east, southeast, west and southwest. The northern margin has the lowest concentration of canyons. We also assess the potential productivity associated with the various canyon types using chlorophyll-a data derived from satellite (MODIS) images. Shelf-incised canyons are associated with significantly higher and more temporally variable chlorophyll-a concentrations, consistent with their function as conduits for upwelling. Australian submarine canyons are well represented in the national network of marine protected areas, with 36 percent of the mapped canyon population intersecting (whole or in part) a Commonwealth Marine Reserve. This information is relevant to setting priorities for the management of these reserves. Results from this study provide a framework for further analysis of the relative importance of canyons on the Australian margin.

Submarine canyons are highly energetic and dynamic environment. Owing to their abrupt and complex topographies that are contrast to the adjacent shelf and slope, they can generate intense mixing, both horizontally through internal tides and waves and vertically through upwelling and downwelling. Complex hydrodynamic processes and increased food supply in sediment and water column result in elevated primary and secondary production which would favour the development of a highly productive and temporally dynamic food web over the canyons. Consequently, many submarine canyons, especially those incise into continental shelf, are considered as biodiversity hotspots. To better understand the ecosystem functions and ecological processes of marine environment, identification and classification of submarine canyons are needed. This study developed a national-scale submarine canyon classification system for Australian ocean based on canyon's physical characteristics. A hierarchical classification scheme was proposed. At the top level, the submarine canyons were classified into shelf-incising canyons and confined-to-slope canyons. At the lower levels, the canyons were classified on their morphometry, shape and location characteristics separately. Accurate identification of submarine canyons was the critical first step for the success of the proposed canyon classification system. A national bathymetry data at a spatial resolution of 250 metres and a completed set of multibeam bathymetry data at a spatial resolution of 50 metres from all previous multibeam surveys, both published by Geoscience Australia, were used. Hill-shaded layers were generated from which most submarine canyons could be easily identified. The extents of individual canyons, from wall to wall, were manually digitised as a GIS polygon layer. The initial number of canyons was then filtered using the following criteria: - Depth of the canyon head is less than 4000 m, - Depth range between the canyon's head and foot is greater than 600 m, and - Incision of the canyon head is greater than 100 m. At the lower levels, the following metrics were calculated as the inputs to the canyon classifications: - Morphometry metrics: incision depth of the canyon head, standard deviation of the slope gradient (within all cells in a canyon), slope gradient between the canyon head and the canyon foot, and canyon overall rugosity. - Shape metrics: canyon area, number of branches, length/width ratio of the smallest bounding rectangle, border index, compactness and canyon volume. - Location metrics: depth of the canyon head, depth range between the canyon's head and foot, canyon density, distance to coast, distance to the shelf break, incision depth (shelf-incising canyons only), and incision area (shelf-incising canyons only). The hierarchal agglomerative clustering technique was used for the unsupervised classifications. After the filtering, a total of 708 submarine canyons were identified for the entire Australian EEZ. Among these 708 canyons, 134 of them incise into continental shelf; the rest are confined in continental slope. For the shelf-incising canyons, the morphometry, shape and location based classifications all resulted in three classes. Combining the three lower level classifications yielded 15 classes. For the slope-confined canyons, the morphometry, shape and location based classifications resulted in three, four and four classes, respectively. Combining the three lower level classifications yielded 37 classes. GeoHab 2013

The Leeuwin Current has significant ecological impact on the coastal and marine ecosystem of south-western Australia. This study investigated the spatial and temporal dynamics of the Leeuwin Current using monthly MODIS SST dataset between July 2002 and December 2012. Topographic Position Index layers were derived from the SST data for the mapping of the spatial structure of the Leeuwin Current. The semi-automatic classification process involves segmentation, 'seeds' growing and manual editing. The mapping results enabled us to quantitatively examine the current's spatial and temporal dynamics in structure, strength, cross-shelf movement and chlorophyll a characteristic. It was found that the Leeuwin Current exhibits complex spatial structure, with a number of meanders, offshoots and eddies developed from the current core along its flowing path. The Leeuwin Current has a clear seasonal cycle. During austral winter, the current locates closer to the coast (near shelf break), becomes stronger in strength and has higher chlorophyll a concentrations. While, during austral summer, the current moves offshore, reduces its strength and chlorophyll a concentrations. The Leeuwin Current also has notable inter-annual variation due to ENSO events. In El Niño years the current is likely to reduce strength, move further inshore and increase its chlorophyll a concentrations. The opposite occurs during the La Niña years. In addition, this study also demonstrated that the Leeuwin Current has a significantly positive influence over the regional nutrient characteristics during the winter and autumn seasons.

In September and October of 2011 Geoscience Australia surveyed part of the offshore northern Perth Basin in order to map potential sites of natural hydrocarbon seepage. The primary objectives of the survey were to map the spatial distribution of seepage sites and characterise the nature of the seepage at these sites (gas vs oil, macroseepage vs microseepage; palaeo vs modern day seepage) on the basis of: acoustic signatures in the water column, shallow subsurface and on the seabed; geochemical signatures in rock and sediment samples and the water column; and biological signatures on the seabed. Areas of potential natural hydrocarbon seepage that were surveyed included proven (drilled) oil and gas accumulations, a breached structure, undrilled hydrocarbon prospects, and areas with potential signatures of fluid seepage identified in seismic, satellite remote sensing and multibeam bathymetry data. Within each of these areas the survey acquired: water column measurements with the CTD; acoustic data with single- and multi-beam echosounders, sidescan sonar and sub-bottom profiler (sidescan not acquired in Area F as it was too deep in places); and sediment and biological samples with the Smith-McIntyre Grab. In addition, data were collected with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV), integrated hydrocarbon sensor array, and CO2 sensor in selected areas. Sampling with the gravity corer had limited success in many of the more shallow areas (A-E) due to the coarse sandy nature of the seabed sediments. This dataset comprises total chlorin concentrations and chlorin indices from the upper 2 cm of seabed sediments.

In September and October of 2011 Geoscience Australia surveyed part of the offshore northern Perth Basin in order to map potential sites of natural hydrocarbon seepage. The primary objectives of the survey were to map the spatial distribution of seepage sites and characterise the nature of the seepage at these sites (gas vs oil, macroseepage vs microseepage; palaeo vs modern day seepage) on the basis of: acoustic signatures in the water column, shallow subsurface and on the seabed; geochemical signatures in rock and sediment samples and the water column; and biological signatures on the seabed. Areas of potential natural hydrocarbon seepage that were surveyed included proven (drilled) oil and gas accumulations, a breached structure, undrilled hydrocarbon prospects, and areas with potential signatures of fluid seepage identified in seismic, satellite remote sensing and multibeam bathymetry data. Within each of these areas the survey acquired: water column measurements with the CTD; acoustic data with single- and multi-beam echosounders, sidescan sonar and sub-bottom profiler (sidescan not acquired in Area F as it was too deep in places); and sediment and biological samples with the Smith-McIntyre Grab. In addition, data were collected with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV), integrated hydrocarbon sensor array, and CO2 sensor in selected areas. Sampling with the gravity corer had limited success in many of the more shallow areas (A-E) due to the coarse sandy nature of the seabed sediments. This dataset comprises sediment oxygen demand measurements from the upper 2 cm of seafloor sediments.