Article
Type of resources
Keywords
Publication year
Topics
-
Update on petroleum in Australia during 2008
-
Overview of the Deep Crustal Seismic surveys conducted by Geoscience Australia and funded through the Onshore Energy Security Program since it's commencement in 2006 to September 2009.
-
The Australian Government policy is to ensure that uranium mining, milling and rehabilitation is based on world best practice standards. A best practice guide for in situ recovery (ISR) uranium mining has been developed to communicate the Australian Government's expectations with a view to achieving greater certainty that ISR mining projects meet Australian Government policy and consistency in the assessment of ISR mine proposals within multiple government regulatory processes. The guide focuses on the main perceived risks; impacts on groundwaters, disposal of mining residues, and radiation protection. World best practice does not amount to a universal template for ISR mining because the characteristics of individual ore bodies determine the best practice
-
A growing need to manage marine biodiversity at local, regional and global scales cannot be met by applying the limited existing biological data sets. Abiotic surrogacy is increasingly valuable in filling the gaps in our knowledge of biodiversity hotspots, habitats needed by endangered or commercially valuable species and systems or processes important to the sustained provision of ecosystem services. This review examines the utility of abiotic surrogates across spatial scales with particular regard to how abiotic variables are tied to processes which affect biodiversity and how easily those variables can be measured at scales relevant to resource management decisions.
-
short discussion on why and how to define lithostratigraphic units, and where to find information on describing sequence stratigraphic and regolith units.
-
Submarine canyons have been recognised as areas of significant ecological and conservation value. In Australia, 713 canyons were mapped and classified in terms of their geomorphic properties. Many of them are identified as Key Ecological Features (KEFs) and protected by Commonwealth Marine Reserves (CMRs) using expert opinion based on limit physical and ecological information. The effectiveness of these KEFs and CMRs to include ecologically significant submarine canyons as prioritised conservation areas needs to be objectively examined. This study used two local-based spatial statistical techniques, Local Moran's I (LMI) and the Gi* statistic, to identify hotspots of Australian canyons (or unique canyons) for conservation priority. The hotspot analysis identified 29 unique canyons according to their physical attributes that have ecological relevance. Most of these unique physical canyons are distributed on the southern margins. Twenty-four of the 29 canyons are enclosed by the existing KEFs and protected by CMRs to varied extents. In addition, the hotspot analysis identified 79 unique canyons according to their chlorophyll a concentrations, all of which are located in the South-east marine planning region. The findings can be used to update or revise the profile descriptions for some existing KEFs. In future, if the boundaries of these KEFs are deemed necessary to be reviewed, the new information and knowledge could also be used to enhance the conservation priorities of these KEFs.
-
Overview of the deep crustal seismic surveys conducted by Geoscience Australia through the Onshore Energy Security Program since its commencment in 2006 up to September 2009.
-
Submarine canyons are recognised as having an influence on oceanographic processes, sediment transport, productivity and benthic biodiversity from the shelf to the slope. However, not all canyons are the same and the relative importance of an individual canyon will, in part, be determined by its form, shape and position on the continental margin. Here we present an analysis of these parameters using an updated national dataset of 713 submarine canyons for the margin of mainland Australia. Attribute data for each canyon is used to classify them into canyon types across a hierarchy of canyon physical characteristics for shelf-incised and slope-confined (blind) canyons. At each level on the hierarchy, large groupings of canyons are identified that represent common sets of characteristics. The spatial distribution of canyons on the Australian margin is not regular, with clusters located in the east, southeast, west and southwest. The northern margin has the lowest concentration of canyons. We also assess the potential productivity associated with the various canyon types using chlorophyll-a data derived from satellite (MODIS) images. Shelf-incised canyons are associated with significantly higher and more temporally variable chlorophyll-a concentrations, consistent with their function as conduits for upwelling. Australian submarine canyons are well represented in the national network of marine protected areas, with 36 percent of the mapped canyon population intersecting (whole or in part) a Commonwealth Marine Reserve. This information is relevant to setting priorities for the management of these reserves. Results from this study provide a framework for further analysis of the relative importance of canyons on the Australian margin.
-
Quarterly column on issues in Australian stratigraphy
-
We describe a new framework for quantitative bushfire risk assessment that has been produced in the Bushfire Cooperative Research Centre's (Bushfire CRC) research program. The framework is aimed at assisting state of the art fire research in Australia and fire risk managers in state and territory governments. There is a need for improved bushfire risk information to address the recommendations on bushfire risk management from the inquiries held after disastrous fires in the past decade. Quantitative techniques will improve this risk information however quantitative bushfire risk assessment is in its infancy in Australia. We use the example of calculating house damage and loss to describe the elements of the framework. The framework builds upon the well-defined processes in the Australian Risk Management standard (AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009) and the National Emergency Risk Assessment Guidelines.