Magnetic field interpretation is not an alternative to palaeomagnetic methods of recovering remanent magnetization information, both because it deals with the resultant of induced and remanent magnetizations and because confidence in recovered magnetization directions cannot match than provided by direct palaeomagnetic measurement. Nevertheless, magnetic field interpretation is highly complementary to palaeomagnetic studies. Palaeomagnetism provides detailed information from small, localised samples whereas magnetic field interpretation provides estimates of the bulk magnetization of substantial volumes (which may be completely buried and un-sampled by boreholes). Without palaeomagnetic and rock magnetic studies much of the geological information latent in magnetic field measurements cannot be accessed, and without the coverage of magnetic field data the extents and relationships of subsurface magnetization events revealed by palaeomagnetic studies cannot be fully mapped.

No abstract available

A study of the consistency of gust wind speed records from two types of recording instruments has been undertaken. The study examined the Bureau of Meteorology's (BoM) wind speed records in order to establish the existence of bias between coincident records obtained by the old pressure-tube Dines anemometers and the records obtained by the new cup anemometers. This study was an important step towards assessing the quality and consistency of gust wind speed records that form the basis of the Australian Standards/NZ Standards for design of buildings for wind actions (AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 and AS 4055:2006). The Building Code of Australia (BCA) requires that buildings in Australia meet the specifications described in the two standards. BoM has been recording peak gust wind speed observations in the Australian region for over 70 years. The Australia/New Zealand Wind Actions Standard as well as the wind engineering community in general rely on these peak gust wind speed observations to determine wind loads on buildings and infrastructure. In the mid-1980s BoM commenced a program to replace the aging Dines anemometers with Synchrotac and Almos cup anemometers. During the anemometer replacement procedure, many localities had both types of anemometers recording extreme events. This allowed us to compare severe wind recordings of both instruments to assess the consistency of the recordings. The results show that the Dines anemometer measures higher gust wind speeds than the 3-cup anemometer when the same wind gust is considered. The bias varies with the wind speed and ranges from 5 to 17%. This poster presents the methodology and main outcomes from the assessment of coincident measurements of gust wind speed.

Climate change is expected to increase severe wind hazard in many regions of the Australian continent with consequences for exposed infrastructure and human populations. The objective of this paper is to provide an initial nationally consistent assessment of wind risk under current climate, utilizing the Australian/New Zealand wind loading standard (AS/NZS 1170.2, 2002) as a measure of the hazard. This work is part of the National Wind Risk Assessment (NWRA), which is a collaboration between the Australian Federal Government (Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency) and Geoscience Australia. It is aimed at highlighting regions of the Australian continent where there is high wind risk to residential structures under current climate, and where, if hazard increases under climate change, there will be a greater need for adaptation. This assessment is being undertaken by separately considering wind hazard, infrastructure exposure and the wind vulnerability of residential buildings. The NWRA will provide a benchmark measure of wind risk nationally (current climate), underpinned by the National Exposure Information System (NEXIS; developed by Geoscience Australia) and the wind loading standard. The methodology which determines the direct impact of severe wind on Australian communities involves the parallel development of the understanding of wind hazard, residential building exposure and the wind vulnerability of residential structures. We provide the current climate wind risk, expressed as annualized loss, based on the wind loading standard.

Building a continental-scale land cover monitoring framework for Australia

The Australian Government formally releases new offshore exploration areas at the annual APPEA conference. In 2012, twenty-seven areas in nine offshore basins are being released for work program bidding. Closing dates for bid submissions are either six or twelve months after the release date, i.e. 8 November 2012 and 9 May 2013, depending on the exploration status in these areas and on data availability. As was the case in 2011, this year's Release again covers a total offshore area of about 200,000 km2. The Release Areas are located in Commonwealth waters offshore Northern Territory, Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania (Figure 1). Areas on the North West Shelf feature prominently again and include underexplored shallow water areas in the Arafura and Money Shoal basins and rank frontier deep water areas in the outer Browse and Roebuck basins as well as on the outer Exmouth Plateau. Following the recent uptake of exploration permits in the Bight Basin (Ceduna and Duntroon sub-basins) Australia's southern margin is well represented in the 2012 Acreage Release. Three new blocks in the Ceduna Sub-basin, four blocks in the Otway Basin, one large block in the Sorell Basin and two blocks in the eastern Gippsland Basin are on offer. Multiple industry nominations for this Acreage Release were received, confirming the healthy status of exploration activity in Australia. The Australian government continues to support these activities by providing free access to a wealth of geological and geophysical data.

The Beagle Sub-basin is a Mesozoic rift basin in the Northern Carnarvon Basin. Oil discovered at Nebo-1 highlights an active petroleum system. 3D seismic interpretation identified pre, syn and post-rift megasequences. Pre-rift fluvio-deltaic and marine sediments were deposited during a thermal sag phase of the Westralian Super Basin. Low rates of extension (Rhaetian to Oxfordian) deposited fluvio-deltaic and marine sediments. During early post-rift thermal subsidence, sediments onlapped and eroded tilted fault blocks formed during the syn-rift phase. Consequently the regional seal (Early Cretaceous Muderong Shale) is absent in the centre. Subsequent successions are dominated by a prograding carbonate wedge showing evidence of erosion from tectonic and eustatic sea level change. 1D burial history modeling of Nebo-1 and Manaslu-1 show that all source rocks are currently at their maximum depths of burial. Sediments to the Late Cretaceous are in the early maturity window for both wells. The Middle Jurassic Legendre Formation reaches mid maturity in Nebo-1. Source, reservoir and seals are present throughout the Triassic to earliest Cretaceous, however, the absence of the regional seal in the central sub-basin reduces exploration targets. The lack of significant inversion increases the likelihood of maintaining trap integrity. Potential plays include compaction folds over tilted horst blocks, roll over and possible inversion anticlines, basin floor fans and intra-formational traps within fluvio-deltaic deposits. Late Cretaceous and younger sediments are unlikely to host significant hydrocarbons due to lack of migration pathways. Source rocks are of adequate maturity and deep faults act as pathways for hydrocarbon migration.

The Australian Government formally releases new offshore exploration areas at the annual APPEA conference. In 2011, twenty-nine areas in eight offshore basins are being released for work program bidding. Closing dates for bid submissions are either six or twelve months after the release date, i.e. 13 October 2011 and 12 April 2012, depending on the exploration status in these areas and on data availability. The 2011 Release is the largest since the year 2000 with all 29 areas, located in Commonwealth waters offshore Northern Territory, Western Australia, Victoria and Tasmania, covering approximately 200,000 km2. The producing hydrocarbon provinces of the Carnarvon, Otway and Gippsland basins are represented by gazettal blocks that are located close to existing infrastructure and are supported by extensive open file data-sets. Other areas that are close to known oil and gas discoveries lie in the Caswell Sub-basin (eastern Browse Basin) and on the Ashmore Platform (north-western Bonaparte Basin). A particular aspect of the 2011 Release is provided by 13 areas in underexplored regions offshore Northern Territory and Western Australia all of which range from 100 to 280 graticular blocks in size. These areas, located in the Money Shoal; outer Browse, Roebuck, north-eastern Carnarvon, Southern Carnarvon and North Perth basins, offer new opportunities for data-acquisition and regional exploration. The release of three large areas in the Southern Carnarvon and North Perth basins is supported by new data acquired and interpreted by Geoscience Australia as part of the Offshore Energy Security Program, of which selected results are being presented at this year's conference.

The Early Cretaceous Gage Sandstone and South Perth Shale formations are a prospective reservoir-seal pair in the Vlaming Sub-basin. Plays include post-breakup pinch-outs in the Gage Sandstone with the South Perth Shale forming top seal. The Gage reservoir has porosities of 18-25% and permeabilities of 1-1340 mD. It was deposited in palaeotopographic lows of the Valanginian breakup unconformity and is the lowstand component of the thick deltaic South Perth (SP) Supersequence. To characterise the reservoir-seal pair, a detailed sequence stratigraphic analysis was conducted by integrating 2D seismic interpretation, well log analysis and new biostratigraphic data. Palaeogeographic reconstructions for the SP Supersequence were derived from mapping higher-order prograding packages and establishing changes in sea level and sediment supply. Higher resolution Gage reservoir reconstructions were based on seismic facies mapping. The Gage reservoir forms part of a sand-rich submarine fan system similar to model proposed by Richards et al (1998). It ranges from canyon confined inner fan deposits to middle fan deposits on a basin plain. Directions of sediment supply are complex, with major sediment contributions from a northern and southern canyon adjacent to the Badaminna Fault Zone. The characteristics of the SP Supersequence differ markedly between the northern and southern parts of the sub-basin due to variations in palaeotopography and sediment supply. Palaeogeographic reconstructions reveal a series of regressions and transgressions leading to infilling of the palaeo-depression. Palaeogeographic reconstructions for the SP Supersequence portray a complex early post-rift depositional history in the central Vlaming Sub-basin. The developed approach is applicable for detailed studies of other sedimentary basins. APPEA

An extensive AEM survey recently commissioned by Geoscience Australia involved the use of two separate SkyTEM helicopter airborne electromagnetic (AEM) systems collecting data simultaneously. In order to ensure data consistency between the two systems, we follow the Danish example (conceived by the hydrogeophysics group from Aarhus University) of using a hover test site to calibrate the AEM data to a known reference. Since 2001, Denmark has employed a national test site for all electromagnetic (EM) instruments that are used there, including the SkyTEM system. The Lyngby test-site is recognised as a well-understood site with a well-described layered-earth structure of 5 layers. The accepted electrical structure model of the site acts as the reference model, and all instruments are brought to it in order to produce consistent results from all EM systems. Using a ground-based time-domain electromagnetic (TEM) system which has been calibrated at the Lyngby test site, we take EM measurements at a site selected here in Australia. With sufficient information of the instrument, we produce a layered-earth model that becomes the reference model for the two AEM systems used in the survey. We then bring the SkyTEM systems to the hover site and take soundings at multiple altitudes. From the hover test data and the ground based model, we calculate an optimal time shift and amplitude scale factor to ensure that both systems are able reproduce the accepted reference model. Conductivity sections produced with and without calibration factors show noticeably different profiles.