petrophysical interpretation
Type of resources
Keywords
Publication year
Topics
-
The recently drilled deep stratigraphic drill hole NDI Carrara 1 penetrates the carbonate formations of the Cambrian Georgina Basin as well as the underlying Proterozoic successions of the Carrara Sub-basin. The Proterozoic section consists predominantly of tight shales, siltstones, and calcareous clastic rocks. This study aims to assess the petrophysical properties of the Proterozoic shales using conventional wireline logs. Gamma ray and neutron-density crossplots were used to calculate shale volume fraction, and neutron-density crossplots were applied to compute the total and effective porosity of non-shale rocks. Total organic carbon (TOC) content was interpreted using artificial neural networks, and was used to derive the volume of organic matter was converted from TOC content. Bulk density logs were corrected by removing the kerogen effect in the organic-rich shales. Matrix and kerogen densities were obtained by correlating the reciprocal of grain density with TOC content. Total shale porosity was calculated from kerogen-corrected density porosity and organic porosity. Effective porosity was estimated by removing the shaliness effect. Water saturation was derived using the Simandoux equation. The Proterozoic Lawn Hill Formation in NDI Carrara 1 exhibits petrophysical properties that indicate a favourable potential for shale gas resources. Herein, we define three informal intervals within the intersected Lawn Hill Formation; the upper Lawn Hill, the Lawn Hill shale, and the lower Lawn Hill. The net shale thickness of the upper Lawn Hill and Lawn Hill shale intervals are 165 m and 149 m, respectively. The increased TOC content and organic porosity of the upper Lawn Hill and Lawn Hill shale implies higher adsorbed gas content potential. The Lawn Hill shale has the highest gas saturation (average of 31.1%) and the highest potential for free gas content, corresponding to the highest methane responses in logged mud gas profiles. This extended Abstract was submitted to/presented at the Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference (AEGC) 2023, Brisbane (https://2023.aegc.com.au/)
-
<div>This data package provides petrophysical interpretations by Geoscience Australian and the South Australia Department for Energy and Mining (SADEM) for 23 wells generated in support of the energy resource assessments under the Australia’s Future Energy Resources (AFER) project in the Pedirka and western Eromanga basins. Interpreted petrophysical data in this data package include [BB1] [MB2] volume of clay/shale, porosity (total and effective), relative permeability, formation water salinity (NaCl equivalent), and apparent resistivity of water.</div><div> </div><div>The AFER project is part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future (EFTF) Program—an eight year, $225 million Australian Government funded geoscience data and precompetitive information acquisition program to inform decision-making by government, community and industry on the sustainable development of Australia's mineral, energy and groundwater resources. By gathering, analysing and interpreting new and existing precompetitive geoscience data and knowledge, Geoscience Australia is building a national picture of Australia’s geology and resource potential. This will help support a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of all Australians. The EFTF program is supporting Australia’s transition to a low emissions economy, industry and agriculture sectors, as well as economic opportunities and social benefits for Australia’s regional and remote communities. Further details are available at http://www.ga.gov.au/eftf.This new data package consists of composite logs and supporting data which includes interpreted volume of clay/ shale, porosity, permeability and salinity.</div><div> </div><div>The data package includes the following datasets: </div><div>1) Composite logs (PDF)</div><div>2) Well logs (ASCII LAS)</div><div>3) Well header information (Microsoft Excel™)[BB3] [MB4] </div><div> </div><div>These petrophysical interpretations are being used to support the AFER Project’s play-based energy resource assessments in the Pedirka and western Eromanga basins by building 3D geological models that include derived rock property maps.
-
The Palaeoproterozoic Fraynes Formation in the Birrindudu Basin is a chronostratigraphic counterpart to the highly prospective Barney Creek Formation in the McArthur Basin. However, there is limited understanding of its source potential in comparison. As part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program, this study aims to assess the hydrocarbon generating potential and shale gas prospectivity of the Fraynes Formation in the exploration drillhole Manbulloo S1 through the reconstruction of original source-rock generating potential and well log interpretation. Internal units inside the Fraynes Formation were defined according to sedimentary facies. The hydrocarbon generation potential was estimated using the original TOC content, hydrogen index and thermal maturity data. The shale total porosity was re-interpreted from bulk density logs by removing the organic matter effect and adding organic porosity for the organic-rich shales. The water saturation was then updated accordingly. The maximum amount of generated gas of the organic-rich source rocks are 3969 Mcf/a-ft, 2769 Mcf/a-ft and 1912 Mcf/a-ft when assuming the kerogen compositions of 100 Type I, mix of 50-50% Type I and II, and 100% Type II, respectively. The richness of organic matter and interpreted water saturation (<100%) imply favourable shale gas prospectivity in the Fraynes Formation. This work expands our knowledge on the unconventional energy resources in the west of the greater McArthur Basin. Paper presented at the 2024 Australian Energy Producers (AEP) Conference & Exhibition (https://pesa.com.au/events/2024-aep-conference-exhibition/)
-
Barnicarndy 1 is a stratigraphic well drilled in the southern part of the Canning Basin’s Barnicarndy Graben under Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program in collaboration with the Geological Survey of Western Australia to provide stratigraphic data for this poorly understood tectonic component. The well intersects a thin Cenozoic section, Permian–Carboniferous fluvial clastics and glacial diamictites and a thick pre-Carboniferous succession (855–2585 mRT) unconformably overlying Neoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks. Three informal siliciclastic intervals were defined based on core lithology, well logs, chemical and mineral compositions: the Upper Sandstone (855–1348.1 mRT), Middle Interval (1348.1–2443.4 mRT) and Lower Sandstone (2443.4–2585 mRT). The Middle Interval was further divided into six internal zones. Both conventional methods and artificial neural network technology were applied to well logs to interpret petrophysical and elastic properties, total organic carbon (TOC) content, pyrolysis products from the cracking of organic matter (S2) and mineral compositions. Average sandstone porosity and reservoir permeability are 17.9% and 464.5 mD in the Upper Sandstone and 6.75% and 10 mD in the Lower Sandstone. The Middle Interval claystone has an average porosity and permeability of 4.17% and 0.006 mD, and average TOC content and S2 value of 0.17 wt% and 0.047 mg HC/g rock, with maximum values of 0.66 wt% and 0.46 mg HC/g rock, respectively. Correlations of mineral compositions and petrophysical, geomechanical and organic geochemical properties of the Middle Interval have been conducted and demonstrate that these sediments are organically lean and lie within the oil and gas window. Published in The APPEA Journal 2021 <b>Citation:</b> Wang Liuqi, Edwards Dianne S., Bailey Adam, Carr Lidena K., Boreham Chris J., Grosjean Emmanuelle, Normore Leon, Anderson Jade, Jarrett Amber J. M., MacFarlane Susannah, Southby Chris, Carson Chris, Khider Kamal, Henson Paul, Haines Peter, Walker Mike (2021) Petrophysical and geochemical interpretations of well logs from the pre-Carboniferous succession in Barnicarndy 1, Canning Basin, Western Australia. <i>The APPEA Journal</i><b> 61</b>, 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ20038