This web service contains map layers and coverages for machine learning models, using raster datasets which include radiometric grid infill, cover depths and conductivity. All grids have been converted to cloud-optimised GeoTIFF (COG) format for use and delivery from an cloud-based object store (AWS s3).

<div><strong>Output Type: </strong>Exploring for the Future Extended Abstract</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Short Abstract: </strong>Most geological mapping either over-estimates the amount of bedrock exposed at the surface or can miss local bedrock exposures in geological units describing cover materials (i.e. alluvium and colluvium). A machine learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has been applied to detect outcrops (exposed bedrock at the earth’s surface) and areas of very shallow cover over bedrock (i.e. sub-crop) at one meter resolution. We used a multi-feature training dataset consisting of sites associated with urban areas, roads, outcrops, waterbodies, soil (includes bare soil and soil covered by green and dry vegetation), trees, and shadows. Even though we were only interested in mapping outcrop, a multi-criteria label set significantly improved overall accuracy of the model. The explanatory variables or covariates included high-resolution satellite imagery, Sentinel-2 imagery, and terrain derivatives. The modelling approach was tested over an area in central West NSW, Australia. Labels were split into 80% for training and 20% for out-of-sample validation. Spatial K-groups were used in the training set to minimize auto-spatial correlation between neighbouring points and reduce the potential for overfitting. Two CNN model architectures were evaluated: Simple-Net and UNet. The Simple-Net structure consists of 2D Convolution layer and flatten layer, whereas the UNet architecture includes a mixture of 2D convolution layer, max pooling, up sampling and flatten layer. These models were tested with and without the use of high-resolution imagery. The UNet model incorporating high resolution imagery gave the best results (accuracy of 0.841 and an F1 score of 0.814), compared with Simple-Net (accuracy of 0.823 and an F1 score of 0.786). However, the Simple-Net’s model without the incorporation of high-resolution imagery was a slight improvement over the UNet architecture and due to the lack of national coverage for high-resolution imagery, the Simple-Net model offers better scalability. The detection of outcrop/sub-crop has broad application in improving the spatial explicitness of existing geological maps, improving sample detection and interpretation of litho-stratigraphy and geochemistry. High spatial resolution of outcrop/sub-crop also has implications in the agricultural and civil engineering sectors, ecology and in understanding surface and near-surface hydrological systems. After this proof-of-concept phase we plan to up-scale the approach nationally using a more representative labels and national covariates.</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Citation: </strong>Du, Z., Wilford, J. &amp; Roberts, D., 2024. Find a rock or a rock nearby using Convolution Neural Networks. In: Czarnota, K. (ed.) Exploring for the Future: Extended Abstracts. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://doi.org/10.26186/149631</div>

<div><strong>Purpose</strong></div><div>This package comprises a set of 86 thematic grids (rasters) derived from national coverages of gravity and magnetic survey data. These datasets provide valuable information about the distribution of geological features, physical property variations, and the composition of the Earth's crust. All grids have been resampled to the same cell size, map extent, and projection to allow them to be integrated into predictive mapping and modelling workflows using machine learning. Users can download individual grids or the whole grid package. </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><strong>Input Data</strong></div><div>The following Australian national datasets were used:</div><div>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2019 Australian National Gravity Grids: Free Air Anomaly, Complete Bouguer Anomaly, De-trended Global Isostatic Residual, 400 m cell size (Lane <em>et al</em>., 2020).</div><div>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Total Magnetic Intensity (TMI) Grid of Australia 2019 - seventh edition Enhanced Products Package (Morse, 2020).</div><div><br></div><div><strong>Processing</strong></div><div>All processing of the national grids were undertaken using Intrepid software. The following was performed on the input data:</div><div>1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The grids were reprojected from GDA94 geodetic to Australian Albers (EPSG 3577). </div><div>2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The grids were aligned to the same grid cell registration point and interpolated to fit within an 80 m cell size using a cubic spline method to ensure that the cell locations for all images are common.</div><div>3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Various Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT) were applied to each grid (see ‘Grids_for_Machine_Learning_dataset_notes.pdf’). </div><div>&nbsp;</div><div><strong>Metadata (all grids)</strong></div><div>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Datum: GDA94</div><div>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Projection: Australian Albers (EPSG 3577)</div><div>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Cell size: 80 m</div><div>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;File format: GeoTiff (.tif)</div> <b>Data is available on request from clientservices@ga.gov.au - Quote eCat# 149130</b>

This web service contains map layers and coverages for machine learning models, using raster datasets which include radiometric grid infill, cover depths and conductivity. All grids have been converted to cloud-optimised GeoTIFF (COG) format for use and delivery from an cloud-based object store (AWS s3). For potassium (K), thorium (Th) and uranium (U) radiometric infill grids, an equalised histogram was applied to each grid. The radiometric ternary image has no style applied, with from transparency for no-data values. A tile service (WMTS) is also integrated into the WMS to provide a high-performing service for integration into web maps and online mapping portals.

The Proterozoic succession in the NDI Carrara 1 drill hole, Northern Territory, consists predominantly of tight shales, siltstones, and calcareous clastic rocks. As part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program, this study aims to derive porosity, permeability and gas content from both laboratory testing and well log interpretation from machine learning approaches, to improve the Proterozoic shale gas reservoir characterisation. The Proterozoic Lawn Hill Formation was divided into four chemostratigraphic packages. The middle two packages were further divided into seven internal units according to principal component analysis and self-organising map clustering on well logs and inorganic geochemical properties. Artificial neural networks were then applied to interpret the mineral compositions, porosity and permeability from well logs, density and neutron-density crossplot interpretations. Gas content was estimated from the interpreted porosity, gas saturation, total organic carbon and clay contents. Petrophysical interpretation results are summarised for all chemostratigraphic packages and units. Package 2 (1116–1430.1 m) has the highest potential among the four chemostratigraphic packages. P2U1 (1116–1271 m) and P2U3 (1335.5–1430.1 m) units have the most favourable petrophysical properties for organic-rich shales with the average total gas contents of 1.25 cm3/g and 1.30 cm3/g, geometric mean permeability of 4.79 µD and 17.56 µD, and net shale thickness of 54.4 m and 85.3 m, respectively. P3U4 unit (687.9–697.9 m) has high gas content and permeability, with the net shale thickness of 29.1 m. Besides the organic-rich shales, the tight non-organic-rich siltstone and shale reservoirs in package 1 (below 1430.1 m) have average gas saturation of 14% and geometric mean permeability of 1.31 µD, respectively. Published in The APPEA Journal 2023. <b>Citation:</b> Wang Liuqi, Bailey Adam H. E., Grosjean Emmanuelle, Carson Chris, Carr Lidena K., Butcher Grace, Boreham Christopher J., Dewhurst Dave, Esteban Lionel, Southby Chris, Henson Paul A. (2023) Petrophysical interpretation and reservoir characterisation on Proterozoic shales in National Drilling Initiative Carrara 1, Northern Territory. <i>The APPEA Journal</i><b> 63</b>, 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1071/AJ22049

<div>A national compilation of airborne electromagnetic (AEM) conductivity–depth models from AusAEM (Ley-Cooper et al. 2020) survey line data and other surveys (see reference list in the attachments) has been used to train a conductivity model prediction for the 0-4 m and 30 m depth intervals. Over 460,000 training points/measurements were used in a 5 K-Fold training and validation split. A further 28,626 points/measurements were used to assess the out of sample performance (OOS; i.e. points not used in the model validation). Modelling of the conductivity values (i.e. measurements along the AEM survey lines) was performed using the gradient boosted (GB) tree algorithm. The GB model is a machine learning (ML) ensemble technique used for both regression and classification tasks (https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.ensemble.GradientBoostingRegressor.html). Samples along the flight-line were thinned to approximately one sample per 300 m. This avoided the situation where we could have more than one sample per pixel (i.e. features or covariates used in the model prediction have a cell or pixel size of 80 m) that could otherwise lead to over fitting. In addition, out of sample set used label clusters or groups to minimise overfitting. Here we use the median of the models as the conductivity prediction and the upper and lower percentiles (95th and 5th respectively) to measure the model uncertainty. Grids show conductivity (S/m) in log 10 units. The methodology used to generate these conductivity grids are overall similar to that described by Wilford, et al. 2022.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Reported out-of-sample r-squares for the 0-4 m and 3 m depths are 0.76 and 0.74, respectively. The ML approach allows estimation of conductivity into areas where we do not have airborne electromagnetic survey coverage. Hence these model have a national extent. Where we do not have AEM survey coverage the model is finding relationships with the covariates and making informed estimates of conductivity in those areas. Where those relationships are not well understood (i.e. where we see a departure in the feature space characteristics from what the model can ‘see’) the model prediction is likely to be less certain. Differences in the features and their corresponding values ‘seen’ and used in the model versus the full feature space covering the entire continent are captured in the covariate shift map. High values in the shift model can indicate higher potential uncertainty or unreliability of the model prediction. Users therefore need to be mindful when interpreting this dataset, of the uncertainties shown by the 5th-95th percentiles, and high values in the covariate shift map.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Datasets in this data package include:</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>1. 0_4m_conductivity_prediction_median.tif</div><div>2. 0_4m_conductivity_lower_percentile_5th.tif</div><div>3. 0_4m_conductivity_upper_percentile_95th.tif</div><div>4. 30m_conductivity_prediction_median.tif</div><div>5.30m_conductivity_lower_percentile_5th.tif</div><div>6. 30m_conductivity_upper_percentile_95th.tif</div><div>7. National_conductivity_model_shift.tif</div><div>8. Full list of referenced AEM survey datasets used to train the model (word document)</div><div>9. Map showing the distribution of training and out-of-sample sites</div><div><br></div><div>All the Geotiffs (1-6) are in log (10) electrical conductivity siemens per metre (S/m).</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>This work is part of Geoscience Australia’s Exploring for the Future program which provides precompetitive information to inform decision-making by government, community and industry on the sustainable development of Australia's mineral, energy and groundwater resources. By gathering, analysing and interpreting new and existing precompetitive geoscience data and knowledge, we are building a national picture of Australia’s geology and resource potential. This leads to a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of all Australians. This includes supporting Australia’s transition to net zero emissions, strong, sustainable resources and agriculture sectors, and economic opportunities and social benefits for Australia’s regional and remote communities. The Exploring for the Future program, which commenced in 2016, is an eight year, $225m investment by the Australian Government.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><strong>Reference:</strong></div><div><br></div><div>Ley-Cooper, A. Y., Brodie, R.C., and Richardson, M. 2020. AusAEM: Australia’s airborne electromagnetic continental-scale acquisition program, Exploration Geophysics, 51:1, 193-202, DOI: 10.1080/08123985.2019.1694393</div><div><br></div><div>Wilford, J., LeyCooper, Y., Basak, S., Czarnota, K. 2022. High resolution conductivity mapping using regional AEM survey and machine learning. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. https://dx.doi.org/10.26186/146380</div>

The geosciences are a data-rich domain where Earth materials and processes are analysed from local to global scales. However, often we only have discrete measurements at specific locations, and a limited understanding of how these features vary across the landscape. Earth system processes are inherently complex, and trans-disciplinary science will likely become increasingly important in finding solutions to future challenges associated with the environment, mineral/petroleum resources and food security. Machine learning is an important approach to synthesise the increasing complexity and sheer volume of Earth science data, and is now widely used in prediction across many scientific disciplines. In this context, we have built a machine learning pipeline, called Uncover-ML, for both supervised and unsupervised learning, prediction and classification. The Uncover-ML pipeline was developed from a partnership between CSIRO and Geoscience Australia, and is largely built around the Python scikit-learn machine learning libraries. In this paper, we briefly describe the architecture and components of Uncover-ML for feature extraction, data scaling, sample selection, predictive mapping, estimating model performance, model optimisation and estimating model uncertainties. Links to download the source code and information on how to implement the algorithms are also provided. <b>Citation:</b> Wilford, J., Basak, S., Hassan, R., Moushall, B., McCalman, L., Steinberg, D. and Zhang, F, 2020. Uncover-ML: a machine learning pipeline for geoscience data analysis. In: Czarnota, K., Roach, I., Abbott, S., Haynes, M., Kositcin, N., Ray, A. and Slatter, E. (eds.) Exploring for the Future: Extended Abstracts, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, 1–4.

<div>With a higher demand for lithium (Li), a better understanding of its concentration and spatial distribution is important to delineate potential anomalous areas. This study uses a digital soil mapping framework to combine data from recent geochemical surveys and environmental covariates to predict and map Li content across the 7.6 million km2 area of Australia. Soil samples were collected by the National Geochemical Survey of Australia at a total of 1315 sites, with both top (0–10 cm depth) and bottom (on average 60–80 cm depth) catchment outlet sediments sampled. We developed 50 bootstrap models using a Cubist regression tree algorithm for both depths. The spatial prediction models were validated on an independent Northern Australia Geochemical Survey dataset, showing a good prediction with an RMSE of 3.82 mg kg-1 for the top depth. The model for the bottom depth has yet to be validated. The variables of importance for the models indicated that the first three Landsat bands and gamma radiometric dose have a strong impact on Li prediction. The bootstrapped models were then used to generate digital soil Li prediction maps for both depths, which could select and delineate areas with anomalously high Li concentrations in the regolith. The map shows high Li concentration around existing mines and other potentially anomalous Li areas. The same mapping principles can potentially be applied to other elements.&nbsp;</div> <b>Citation:</b> Ng, W., Minasny, B., McBratney, A., de Caritat, P., and Wilford, J.: Digital soil mapping of lithium in Australia, <i>Earth Syst. Sci. Data</i>, 15, 2465–2482, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2465-2023, <b>2023</b>.

The AEM method measures regolith and rocks' bulk subsurface electrical conductivity, typically to a depth of several hundred meters. AEM survey data is widely used in Australia for mineral exploration (i.e. mapping undercover and detection of mineralisation), groundwater assessment (i.e. hydro-stratigraphy and water quality) and natural resource management (i.e. salinity assessment). Geoscience Australia (GA) has flown Large regional AEM surveys over Northern Australia, including Queensland, Northern Territory and Western Australia. The surveys were flown nominally at 20-kilometre line spacing, using the airborne electromagnetic systems that have signed technical deeds of staging with GA to ensure they can be modelled quantitatively. Geoscience Australia commissioned the survey as part of the Exploring for the Future (EFTF) program. The EFTF program is led by Geoscience Australia (GA), in collaboration with the Geological Surveys of the Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia, and is investigating the potential mineral, energy and groundwater resources in northern Australia and South Australia. We have used a machine learning modelling approach that establishes predictive relationships between the inverted flight-line modelled conductivity with a suite of national environmental and geological covariates. These covariates include terrain derivatives, gamma-ray radiometric, geological maps, climate derived surfaces and satellite imagery. Conductivity-depth values were derived from a single model using GA's deterministic 1D smooth-30-layer layered-earth-inversion algorithm. (Brodie and Richardson 2015). Three conductivity depth interval predictions are generated to interpolate the actual modelled conductivity data, which is 20km apart. These depth slices include a 0-50cm, 9-11m and 22-27m depth prediction. Each depth interval was modelled and individually optimised using the gradient boosted tree algorithm. The training cross-validation step used label clusters or groups to minimise over-fitting. Many hundreds of conductivity models are generated (i.e. ensemble modelling). Here we use the median of the models as the conductivity prediction and the upper and lower percentiles (95th and 5th) to measure model uncertainty. Grids show conductivity (S/m) in log 10 units. Reported out-of-sample r-squares for each interval in order of increasing depth are 0.74, 0.64, and 0.67. A decline in model performance with increasing depth was expected due to the decrease in suitable covariates at greater depths. Modelled conductivities seem to be consistent with the geological, regolith, geomorphological, and climate processes in the study area. The conductivity grids are at the resolution of the covariates, which have a nominal pixel size of 85 meters. Datasets in this data package include; 1. 0-50cm depth interval 0_50cm_median.tif; 0_50_upper.tif; 0_50_lower.tif 2. 9-11m depth interval 9_11m_median.tif; 9_11m_upper.tif; 9_11m_lower.tif 3. 22-27m depth interval 22_27_median.tif; 22_27_upper.tif; 22_27_lower.tif 4. Covariate shift; Cov_shift.tif (higher values = great shift in covariates) Reference: Ross C Brodie & Murray Richardson (2015) Open Source Software for 1D Airborne Electromagnetic Inversion, ASEG Extended Abstracts, 2015:1, 1-3, DOI: 10.1071/ ASEG2015ab197

Prediction of true classes of surficial and deep earth materials using multivariate geospatial data is a common challenge for geoscience modellers. Most geological processes leave a footprint that can be explored by geochemical data analysis. These footprints are normally complex statistical and spatial patterns buried deep in the high-dimensional compositional space. This paper proposes a spatial predictive model for classification of surficial and deep earth materials derived from the geochemical composition of surface regolith. The model is based on a combination of geostatistical simulation and machine learning approaches. A random forest predictive model is trained and features are ranked based on their contribution to the predictive model. To generate potential and uncertainty maps, compositional data are simulated at unsampled locations via a chain of transformations (isometric log-ratio transformation followed by flow anamorphosis) and geostatistical simulation. The simulated results are subsequently back-transformed to the original compositional space. The trained predictive model is used to estimate the probability of classes for simulated compositions. The proposed approach is illustrated through two case studies. In the first case study the major crustal blocks of the Australian continent are predicted from the surface regolith geochemistry of the National Geochemical Survey of Australia project. The aim of the second case study is to discover the superficial deposits (peat) from the regional-scale soil geochemical data of the Tellus project. The accuracy of the results in these two case studies confirms the usefulness of the proposed method for geological class prediction and geological process discovery.