Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a technique for mitigating anthropogenic climate change by separating CO2 from industrial flue gas, transporting it to and storing it in a subsurface geological storage reservoir. The low-salinity (TDS<3 000 mg/L) Jurassic sandstone formations in Australia's Surat Basin have been identified as a potential reservoir system for geological CO2 sequestration. However, given the prevailing use of saline reservoirs in CCS projects elsewhere, limited data are available on CO2-water-rock dynamics during geological sequestration in such low-salinity formations. Here, a combined batch experiment and numerical modelling approach is used to characterise potential CO2-water-rock reaction pathways, to assess potential impacts of CCS on groundwater chemistry, and to identify geochemical tracers of inter- and intra-formational CO2 migration during geological sequestration within the Jurassic sandstones. Mineralogy and physical properties of the prospective reservoir are characterized for 66 core samples from stratigraphic well GSQ Chinchilla 4. Representative samples are reacted with synthetic formation water and high-purity CO2 for up to 27 days at a range of pressures to simulate conditions during carbon sequestration in the Jurassic sandstones. Results show the low formation water salinity, temperature, and mineralization in the reservoirs yield high solubility trapping capacity (1.18 mol/L at 45°C, 100 bar), while the paucity of divalent cations in groundwater and the silicate reservoir matrix result in very low mineral trapping capacity within the footprint of the supercritical CO2 (scCO2) plume. Though alkalinity buffers formation water pH under elevated CO2 pressure, the acidic pH significantly enhances mineral dissolution in reactors with heterogeneous Hutton and Boxvale Sandstone samples. Smaller TDS changes are observed for samples of the mature Precipice Sandstone than for the other formations. Non-radiogenic, regional groundwater-like 87Sr/86Sr values (0.704845 - 0.706600) in batch reactors indicate carbonate and authigenic clay dissolution as the primary reaction pathways regulating solution composition in all formations during carbon sequestration. Slightly higher Sr isotope ratios in felsic samples than in calcitic samples, and dissolved Si concentrations in mature Precipice Sandstone reactors show detrital silicate dissolution to be an ancillary process. Batch reactor degassing at the end of the incubation period was simulated to assess geochemical changes in formation waters during transport away from a scCO2 plume. Model results suggest geological sequestration in the Jurassic sandstone formations would increase regional groundwater alkalinity and redistribute carbonate minerals outside the scCO2 footprint, but is unlikely to result in net mineral trapping of CO2. Several elements are mobilised in concentrations greater than found in regional groundwater, making them viable tracers of CO2 migration. Most notable is cobalt, concentrations of which are significantly elevated regardless of CO2 pressure or sample mineralogy. Experimental results indicate manganese and cadmium concentrations may locally exceed drinking water quality guidelines, but further modelling of intra aquifer mixing is required to quantify the potential risk to regional groundwaters from trace element mobilisation.

Exploring for the Future (EFTF) is an Australian Government program led by Geoscience Australia, in partnership with state and Northern Territory governments. This first phase of the EFTF program (2016–2020) aimed to assist industry investment in resource exploration in frontier regions of northern Australia by providing precompetitive data and information about energy, mineral and groundwater resource potential. As part of this initiative, this record presents whole-rock inorganic geochemistry data including X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) analyses and quantitative X-ray diffraction (qXRD) results for 67 drill core and cuttings samples of sedimentary rocks from Barnicarndy 1 drilled in the Barnicarndy Graben of the Canning Basin. The inorganic geochemistry analyses were undertaken by Geoscience Australia and Bureau Veritas (BV). This work complements other components of the EFTF program, including a comprehensive sampling program of the Barnicarndy 1 deep stratigraphic well, the Kidson Sub-basin seismic survey, and the Kidson Sub-basin petroleum systems model to better understand the geological evolution, basin architecture and petroleum prospectivity of the region.

This service provides access to inorganic geochemistry data obtained from chemical analyses of rock and regolith samples collected during mapping and sampling programs in Australia. This service will provide a spatial distribution of the sample attributes as well as provide a spatial distribution of the analytical composition of the samples with respect to major elements, minor elements and rare earth elements. This service includes original inorganic geochemistry data levelled to reference datasets.

Paleoproterozoic arc and backarc assemblages accreted to the south Laurentian margin between 1800 Ma and 1600 Ma, and previously thought to be indigenous to North America, more likely represent fragments of a dismembered marginal sea developed outboard of the formerly opposing Australian-Antarctic plate. Fugitive elements of this arc-backarc system in North America share a common geological record with their left-behind Australia-Antarctic counterparts, including discrete peaks in tectonic and/or magmatic activity at 1780 Ma, 1760 Ma, 1740 Ma, 1710-1705 Ma, 1690-1670 Ma, 1650 Ma and 1620 Ma. Subduction rollback, ocean basin closure and the arrival of Laurentia at the Australian-Antarctic convergent margin first led to arc-continent collision at 1650-1640 Ma and then continent-continent collision by 1620 Ma as the last vestiges of the backarc basin collapsed. Collision induced obduction and transfer of the arc and more outboard parts of the Australian-Antarctic backarc basin onto the Laurentian margin where they remained following later breakup of the Neoproterozoic Rodinia supercontinent. North American felsic rocks generally yield Nd depleted mantle model ages consistent with arc and backarc assemblages built on early Paleoproterozoic Australian crust as opposed to older Archean basement making up the now underlying Wyoming and Superior cratons. Appeared in Lithosphere (2019) 11 (4): 551–559, June 10, 2019.

This database contains geochemical data for samples analysed both for inorganic and organic geochemistry. Analytical data are sourced from Geoscience Australia's Inorganic Geochemistry Database (OZCHEM) and Organic Geochemistry Database (ORGCHEM), respectively. The data are joined on a unique sample number. Inorganic geochemical data cover the majority of the periodic table, with metadata on analytical methods and detection limits. Organic geochemical data include results of pyrolysis, derivative calculated values, and, where available, isotopic composition of carbonates (D13C) and isotopic composition of rock nitrogen (D15N). Further, there are provisions for delivery of isotopic data for kerogen (H, C, N) and oxygen (O) for carbonates. Where available, sample descriptions include stratigraphic unit names and ages, and lithology. Location information includes coordinates of the sampled feature (eg, borehole), coordinates of the sample and sample depth. Interpretation of the combined inorganic and organic geochemistry for organic-rich shales will facilitate comprehensive characterisation of hydrocarbons source rocks and mineral commodities source and trap environments. All are achieved within the frameworks of petroleum and mineral systems analysis. The initial data delivered by this service include 1785 samples from 35 boreholes from 14 geological provinces, including recently released data for 442 samples from the South Nicholson National Drilling Initiative Carrara 1 stratigraphic drill hole (Butcher et al., 2021; Carson et al., 2021). Many sampled boreholes are located within the polygon of the Exploring for the Future Barkly-Isa-Georgetown project. This dataset will be updated periodically as more data become available.

Geoscience Australia and its predecessors have analysed hydrochemistry of water sampled from boreholes (both pore water and groundwater), surface features, and rainwater. Sampling was undertaken during drilling or monitoring projects, and this dataset represents a significant subset of stored analyses. Water chemistry including isotopic data is essential to better understand groundwater origins, ages and dynamics, processes such as recharge and inter-aquifer connectivity and for informing conceptual and numerical groundwater models. This GA dataset underpins a nationally consistent data delivery tool and web-based mapping to visualise, analyse and download groundwater chemistry and environmental isotope data. This dataset is a spatially-enabled groundwater hydrochemistry database based on hydrochemistry data from projects completed in Geoscience Australia. The database includes information on physical-chemical parameters (EC, pH, redox potential, dissolved oxygen), major and minor ions, trace elements, nutrients, pesticides, isotopes and organic chemicals. Basic calculations for piper plots colours are derived from Peeters, 2013 - A Background Color Scheme for Piper Plots to Spatially Visualize Hydrochemical Patterns - Groundwater, Volume 52(1) <https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12118>. Upon loading the data to the database, all hydrochemistry data are assessed for reliability using Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures and all datasets were standardised. This data is made accessible with open geospatial consortium (OGC) web services and is discoverable via the Geoscience Australia Portal (<a href="https://portal.ga.gov.au/">https://portal.ga.gov.au/</a>). This dataset is published with the permission of the CEO, Geoscience Australia.

<b> Legacy service retired 29/11/2022</b> This is an Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) web service providing access to Australian onshore and offshore borehole data conforming to the GeoSciML version 4.0 specification. The borehole data includes Mineral Drillholes, Petroleum Wells and Water Bores along with a variety of others types. The dataset has been restricted to onshore and offshore Australian boreholes, and bores that have the potential to support geological investigations and assessment of a variety of resources.

<b>Legacy service Retired 29/11/2022 IMPORTANT NOTICE: </b>This web service has been deprecated. The Australian Onshore and Offshore Boreholes OGC service at https://services.ga.gov.au/gis/boreholes/ows should now be used for accessing Geoscience Australia borehole data. This is an Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) web service providing access to Australian onshore and offshore borehole data. This web service is intended to complement the borehole GeoSciML-Portrayal v4.0 web service, providing access to the data in a simple, non-standardised structure. The borehole data includes Mineral Drillholes, Petroleum Wells and Water Bores along with a variety of others types. The dataset has been restricted to onshore and offshore Australian boreholes, and bores that have the potential to support geological investigations and assessment of a variety of resources.

The Exploring for the Future (EFTF) program is an Australian government initiative to boost investment in resource exploration and development in Australia, and is committed to supporting a strong economy, resilient society and sustainable environment for the benefit of Australians. There are a number of interrelated projects within the EFTF, including the Australia’s Resources Framework (ARF) project. The latter is a continental-scale project aimed at laying the foundations for a national view of Australia’s surface and subsurface geology, to underpin our understanding of the continent’s mineral, energy and groundwater potential. The ARF project involves new, large-scale data acquisition, advances in big data analytics and tailored resource assessments, to support the resource sector, agriculture, remote communities and the environment, and contribute to community safety. As part of ARF, Geoscience Australia has been undertaking studies of Australian basins that are prospective for, or have potential for, basin-hosted base metal mineral systems (Pb-Zn, Co-Cu), as part of the basins module. The first component of this module (2016-2020) investigated the Paleoproterozoic to Mesoproterozoic greater McArthur Basin system, Northern Territory and western Queensland (Champion et al., 2020 a, b, c; Huston et al. 2020). The 2020-2024 module is focusing on the Neoproterozoic part of the Stuart Shelf region of the Adelaide Superbasin, South Australia. The Paleo- to Mesoproterozoic sedimentary and volcanic sequences of the Mount Isa–McArthur Basin region of Northern Territory and Queensland are host to a range of world class mineral deposits (Hutton et al., 2012) and include the basin-hosted base metal deposits of the North Australian Zinc Belt, the world’s richest belt of zinc deposits (Huston et al., 2006; Large et al., 2005). These syngenetic (and epigenetic) basin-hosted mineral deposits include McArthur River (formerly HYC) and Century lead-zinc (Pb-Zn) deposits, the Walford Creek Zn-Pb-Cu-Ag deposit (Rohrlach et al., 1998; Large et al., 2005; Hutton et al. 2012) and the Redbank Cu deposit (Knutson et al. 1979). The Neoproterozoic sedimentary sequences of the Stuart Shelf, and their continuation into the Torrens Hinge Zone and Adelaide Rift Complex (Adelaide Superbasin), South Australia, are host to, or form an integral part of, a number of, often historically important, deposits, including the first copper mining region in Australia. These include, amongst others, the Kapunda, Mt Gunson, Cattle Grid, MG14, Windabout, Myall Creek, and Emmie Bluff copper deposits (Lambert et al. 1980, 1984, 1985 1987; Knutson et al. 1983; Coda Minerals 2020, 2021). These deposits are hosted within the Neoproterozoic sediments or along the basal unconformity with older Mesoproterozoic clastic sedimentary rocks (Lambert et al. 1987). This report contains reanalysed geochemical data, and associated sample metadata, for legacy samples collected by the Baas Becking laboratories in the 1970’s from deposits and surrounds in the MacArthur Basin and Stuart Shelf region. This includes samples (mafic igneous rocks, mineralised samples and sedimentary rocks) from the Redbank Cu deposit and surrounds in the McArthur Basin, partly documented in Knutson et al. (1979); samples (sediments, mafic igneous rocks including basement volcanic units (Gawler Range Volcanics), and mineralised samples) from the Mt Gunson deposit and surrounds (Mt Gunson-Lake Dutton area) documented in Knutson et al. (1983, 1992); and a small subset of five samples (sediments, variably mineralised) from the Myall Creek prospect, documented in Lambert et al. (1984). The great majority of these samples are from drill core, with the full list of samples analyses and metadata listed in Appendix A and summarised in Table 1. This data release also includes 52 samples from the Killi Killi Hills regions and surrounds, Tanami, Northern Territory (jobno 9004424), collected by the NTGS and GA, and originally analysed, in the early 1990’s and early 2000’s. These samples included a subset of P2O5-Sr-HREE-enriched Gardiner Sandstone samples from the Killi Killi Hills prospect. These samples are not directly related to the basins project but have been included as they were analysed at the same time as the Stuart Shelf and Redbank samples, and they increase the number of samples and the range of rock types analysed, and so help with statistics for QA/QC purposes. All geochemical data are provided in the appendices, listed by batch. The data can be downloaded via the Geoscience Australia EFTF portal (https://portal.ga.gov.au/persona/eftf).

<div>Levelling of geochemical data between surveys is a vital step in using datasets together. This code can apply a number of approaches to eliminate inter-laboratory differences from multi-generational and spatially isolated geochemical surveys. This codes allow the use of a variety of levelling methods: re-analysis, single standards, and multiple standards. The methodology and effectiveness of each of these methods are outlined in Main, P.T. and Champion, D.C., 2022. Levelling of multi-generational and spatially isolated geochemical surveys. Journal of Geochemical Exploration.</div>