This release comprises the 3D geological model of the Yilgarn-Officer-Musgrave (YOM) region, Western Australia, as Gocad voxets and surfaces. The YOM 3D geological model was built to highlight the broad-scale crustal architecture of the region and extends down to 60 km depth.

The first edition ACE - Australian Continental Elements dataset is a GIS representation of the lithosphere fabrics of the Australian plate, interpreted from linear features and associated discontinuities in the gravity anomaly map of continental Australia (Bacchin et al., 2008; Nakamura et al., 2011) and the global marine gravity dataset compiled from satellite altimetry (Sandwell & Smith, 2009). It should be used in context with these input data sources, at scales no more detailed than the nominal scale of 1:5 000 000.

Australia is one of the lowest, flattest, most arid, and most slowly eroding continents on Earth (Quigley et al. 2010). The average elevation of the continent is only c. 330 m above sea level (asl), maximum local topographic relief is everywhere <1500 m (defined by elevation ranges with 100 km radii) and two-thirds of the continent is semi-arid to arid. With the exception of localized upland areas in the Flinders and Mt Lofty Ranges (Quigley et al. 2007a, Quigley et al. 2007b) and the Eastern Highlands (Chappell 2006, Tomkins et al. 2007), bedrock erosion rates are typically 1-10 m/Ma (Wellman & McDougall 1974, Bishop 1985, Young & MacDougall 1993, Bierman & Caffee 2002, Belton et al. 2004, Chappell 2006, Heimsath et al. 2010) (Fig. 1A). Despite this apparent geomorphological longevity (e.g. Fig. 1B), Australia has had a dynamic Neogene to Recent tectonic history. In the last five decades seven locations in intraplate Australia are documented as having experienced earthquakes large enough to rupture the ground surface (Clark et al. 2013). These earthquakes produced scarps up to 2 m high and 37 km long. Several hundred features consistent in form to the historic ruptures have since been identified Australia-wide (Fig. 2), mainly through interrogation of digital elevation data (Clark et al. 2011, Clark et al. 2012). Palaeoseismic analysis of these features indicates that periods of earthquake activity comprising a finite number of large events are separated by much longer periods of seismic quiescence. While morphogenic earthquake events in an active period on a given fault may be separated by a few thousand years (-0.4 mm/a uplift rates in an active period), active periods might be separated by a million years or more (long term uplift rates -0.001mm/a). A rupture sequence of this kind has the potential to have a dramatic effect on the landscape, especially in regions of low local topographic relief, such as the Murray Basin. For example, uplift across the Cadell Fault (see Fig. 2 for location) in the interval 70 - 20 ka resulted in the formation of a 15 m high and 80 km long scarp which temporarily dammed, and ultimately diverted the Murray and Goulburn Rivers (McPherson et al. 2012). Even in upland regions, the effects can be marked, as demonstrated by the formation of Lake George over the last ca. 4 Ma as the result of uplift on the Lake George Fault (Pillans 2012). Over timescales of millions of years, such activity, in combination with mantle-related dynamic topographic effects (Sandiford 2007, Sandiford et al. 2009, Quigley et al. 2010), might be expected to have a significant influence on the distribution and thickness of regolith over large areas.

These data comprises the 3D geophysical and geological map of the Georgina-Arunta region, Northern Territory. This 3D map summarises the key basement provinces of this region, including the geometric relationships between these provinces. Depth of cover data, and approximate thicknesses of key basins within the region are also provided. Supporting geophysical studies, including inversions of gravity and magnetic data, and seismic data and their corresponding interpretations acquired under the Australian Government's Onshore Energy Security Program, are included with this 3D map. Finally, additional data, such as topographic data, are also included.

Abstract for the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS) conference on 24-28 June 2013.

On 23 March 2012 a MW 5.4 intraplate earthquake occurred in the eastern Musgrave Ranges of north-central South Australia, near the community of Ernabella (Pukatja). This was the largest earthquake recorded on mainland Australia in the past 15 years and resulted in the formation of a 1.6 km-long surface deformation zone that included reverse fault scarps with a maximum vertical displacement of ~0.5 m (average ~0.1 m), extensive ground cracking, and numerous rock falls. Fifteen months later, on 09 June 2013 a MW 5.6 earthquake (the Mulga Park earthquake) occurred ~15-20 km northwest of the 2012 rupture. The P-axes of the focal mechanisms constructed for both events indicate northeast-oriented horizontal compressive stress. However, the focal mechanism for the Mulga Park earthquake suggests strike-slip failure, with a sub-vertical northerly-trending nodal plane favoured as the failure plane, in contrast to the thrust mechanism for the 2012 event. Despite being felt more widely than the 2012 event, ground cracking and minor dune settlement were the only surface expressions relating to the Mulga Park earthquake. No vertical displacements were evident, nor were patterns indicative of a significant lateral displacement. An 18 km long north to north east trending arcuate band of moderate to high cracking density was mapped parallel to the surface trace of the Woodroffe Thrust, a major crust-penetrating fault system. A lobe of high-density cracking ~5km long, coincident with the calculated epicentral location, extended to the north from the centre of the main arc. We speculate that the rupture progressed to the south beneath the northern high-density lobe (consistent with the dimensions expected from new scaling relations), and that the larger arcuate band of cracking might relate to positive interference resulting from reflection of energy from the Woodroffe Thrust interface. Both events provide new insight into the rupture behaviour of faults in non-extended cratonic crust.

In November, 2018 a workshop of experts sponsored by UNESCO’s Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission was convened in Wellington, New Zealand. The meeting was organized by Working Group (WG) 1 of the Pacific Tsunami Warning System (PTWS). The meeting brought together fourteen experts from various disciplines and four different countries (New Zealand, Australia, USA and French Polynesia) and four observers from Pacific Island countries (Tonga, Fiji), with the objective of understanding the tsunami hazard posed by the Tonga-Kermadec trench, evaluating the current state of seismic and tsunami instrumentation in the region and assessing the level of readiness of at-risk populations. The meeting took place in the “Beehive” Annex to New Zealand’s Parliament building nearby the offices of the Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management. The meeting was co-chaired by Mrs. Sarah-Jayne McCurrach (New Zealand) from the Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management and Dr. Diego Arcas (USA) from NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory. As one of the meeting objectives, the experts used their state-of-the-science knowledge of local tectonics to identify some of the potential, worst-case seismic scenarios for the Tonga-Kermadec trench. These scenarios were ranked as low, medium and high probability events by the same experts. While other non-seismic tsunamigenic scenarios were acknowledged, the level of uncertainty in the region, associated with the lack of instrumentation prevented the experts from identifying worse case scenarios for non-seismic sources. The present report synthesizes some of the findings of, and presents the seismic sources identified by the experts to pose the largest tsunami risk to nearby coastlines. In addition, workshop participants discussed existing gaps in scientific knowledge of local tectonics, including seismic and tsunami instrumentation of the trench and current level of tsunami readiness for at-risk populations, including real-time tsunami warnings. The results and conclusions of the meeting are presented in this report and some recommendations are summarized in the final section.

Tectono-metallogenic systems are geological systems that link geodynamic and tectonic processes with ore-forming processes. Although fundamental geodynamic processes, which include buoyancy-related processes, crustal/lithospheric thinning and crustal/lithospheric thickening, have occurred throughout Earth's history, tectonic systems, which are driven by these processes, have evolved as Earth's interior has cooled. Although details remain controversial, tectonic systems are thought to have evolved from magma oceans in the Hadean through an unstable "stagnant-lid" regime in the earlier Archean into a proto-plate tectonic regime from the late Archean onwards. Modern-style plate tectonics is thought to have become dominant by the start of the Paleozoic. Although mineral systems with general similarities to modern or geologically recent systems have been present episodically through much of Earth's history, most of Earth's present endowment of mineral wealth was formed during and after the NeoArchean, when proto- or modern-style plate tectonic systems became increasinly dominant and following major changes in the chemistry of the atmosphere and hydrosphere. The characteristics of some mineral systems, such as the volcanic-hosted massive sulphide (VHMS) system, reflect these changes in tectonic style. Not only have tectono-metallogenic systems evolved in general over Earth's history, but specific tectono-metallogenic systems evolve over much shorter time frames. Most mineral deposits form in three general tectono-metallogenic systems: divergent systems, convergent systems, and intraplate systems. Although fundamental geodynamic processes have driven the evolution of these systems, their importance has changed as the systems evolved. For example, buoyancy-driven (mantle convection/plumes) and crustal thinning are the most important rocesses driving the early rift stage of divergent tectono-metallogenic systems, whereas buoyancy-driven processes (slab sinking) and crustal thickening are the most important processes during the subduction stage of convergent systems. Crustal thinning can also be an important process in the hinterland of subduction zones, producing back-arc basins than can host a number of mineral systems. As fundamental geodynamic processes act as drivers at some stage in virtually all tectonic systems, these cannot be used to identify tectonic systems. Moreover, as mineral systems are ultimately the products of these same geodynamic drivers, individual mineral deposits types cannot be used to determine tectonic systems, although mineral deposit assemblages can, in some cases, be indicative of the tectono-metallogenic system. Ore deposits are the products of geological (mineral) systems that operate over a long time frame (hundreds of millions of years) and at scales up to the craton-scale. In essence, mineral systems increase the concentrations of commodities through geochemical and geophysical processes from bulk Earth levels to levels amenable to economic mining. Mineral system components include the geological (tectonic and architectural) setting, the driver(s) of mineralising processes, metal and fluid sources, fluid pathways, depositional trap, and post-depositional modifications. All of these components link back to geodynamic processes and the tectonic system. For example, crustal architecture, which controls the spatial distribution of, and fluid flow, within mineral systems, is largely determined by geodynamic processes and tectonic systems, and the timing of mineralisation, which generally is relatively short (commonly < 1 Myr), correlates with local and/or far-field tectonic events.

The Australian Lithospheric Architecture Magnetotelluric Project (AusLAMP) aims to collect long period magnetotelluric (MT) sites on a 0.5 degree (~55 km) grid across the Australian continent. Data and models produced from this program will help to inform our understanding of Australia’s lithospheric architecture and tectonic processes. The New South Wales component of AusLAMP is a collaborative project between Geoscience Australia and the Geological Survey of New South Wales. This new dataset will add to the coverage of the Victorian and South Australian AusLAMP programs, which are both complete. This presentation is prepared for the Mines and Wines Conference, 2019, and details the progress of the AusLAMP NSW program. These include data, models and preliminary interpretations that are coming out of the program. Presentation for Discovery in the Tasmanides (Mines and Wines), Wagga Wagga, NSW, 25-28 September 2019 (https://smedg.org.au/events/)

Long-term temporal and spatial patterns in large earthquake occurrence can be deduced from the Australian landscape record and used to inform contemporary earthquake hazard science. Seismicity source parameters such as fault slip-rates, large earthquake recurrence times and maximum magnitude vary across the continent, and can be interpreted within a framework of large-scale neotectonic domains defined on the basis of geology and crustal setting. While the suite of neotectonic fault behaviours may vary across Australia, as implied by the neotectonic domains model, one individual fault characteristic appears to be common to most Australian intraplate faults studied active periods comprising a finite number of events are separated by much longer periods of quiescence. Studies elsewhere in the world identify similar episodic behaviour on faults with low slip rates and suggest that the time between successive clusters of events (deformation phases) is highly variable but significantly longer than the times between successive earthquakes within an active phase. Furthermore, there is some indication that the temporal clustering behaviour emerging from single fault studies may be symptomatic of a larger picture of the more or less continuous tectonic activity from the late Miocene to Recent being punctuated by pulses of activity in specific, actively deforming regions. At present the underlying tectonic processes driving the observed variability in Australian seismicity are poorly understood. Questions remain as to whether stress accumulation and/or strain release is predictable, and at what scale. In this talk, we will outline some of the key challenges facing earthquake hazard scientists in Australia, and how these are being addressed.