Authors / CoAuthors
George, S.C. | Wilkins, R.W.T. | Boreham, C.J.
Abstract
The geological debate about whether, and to what extent, humic coals have sourced oil is likely to continue for some time, despite some important advances in our knowledge of the processes involved. Both liptinites and perhydrous vitrinites have the potential to generate oil; the key problem is whether this oil can be expelled. Expulsion of hydrocarbons is best explained by activated diffusion of molecules to maceral boundaries and ultimately by cleats and fractures to coal seam boundaries. The relative timing of release of generated CO2 and CH4 could have considerable importance in promoting the expulsion of liquid hydrocarbons. The main reason for poor expulsion from coal is the adsorption of oil on the organic macromolecule, which may be overcome (1) if coals are thin and interbedded with clastic sediments, or (2) if the coals are very hydrogen rich and generate large quantities of oil. Review of the distribution of oil-prone coals in time and space reveals that most are Jurassic-Tertiary, with key examples from Australia, New Zealand and Indonesia. Regarding establishing oil-coal correlations, a complication is that the molecular geochemistry of coals is often very similar to that of the enclosing, fine-grained rocks containing terrestrial organic matter. One potential solution to this problem is the use of carbon and hydrogen isotopes of n-alkanes, which have recently been shown to be powerful discriminators of mudstone and coal sources in the Turpan Basin (China). There is a continuum from carbonaceous shales to pure coals, but the question as to which of these are effective oil sources is an extremely important issue, because volumetric calculations hinge on the result. Unambiguous evidence of expulsion from coals is limited. Bitumen-filled microfractures in sandstones interbedded with coals in offshore mid-Norway and in Scotland have been interpreted to be the migration routes of hydrocarbons from the coal seams towards the sandstones. In the San Juan Basin, USA, direct evidence for the primary migration of oil within coal is provided by the sub-economic quantities (10s to 100s of barrels per well) of light oil produced directly from coal beds of the Upper Cretaceous Fruitland Formation. The Gippsland Basin (Australia) is commonly cited as the outstanding example of a province dominated by oil from coal, but there is no literature that explicitly demonstrates that generation and expulsion has been from the coal seams and not the intervening carbonaceous mudstones. The best evidence for coals as source for oil in the Gippsland appears to be volumetric modelling, which indicates that it would have been impossible to generate the volume of oil discovered to date from the organic-rich shales alone. However, early reports that mid-Jurassic coals in mid-Norway were a major source of the reservoired oils, also based to a large extent on oil generation and expulsion modelling, have now been shown to be inaccurate by detailed biomarker, isotope, whole oil and pyrolysis studies. The most convincing commercial oil discoveries that can be correlated to coals are: (1) Taranaki Basin oils in New Zealand, where Late Cretaceous and Tertiary coals, shaly coals and carbonaceous mudstones are likely to have sourced oils in approximate proportion to their volumes and organic contents, and (2) the oils and condensates in the Harald, Amalie and Lulita oilfields (Danish North Sea) which are likely to have been sourced are least partially from mid-Jurassic coals. New oil-source correlation studies based on diterpane, triterpane and sterane distributions in the Bass Basin (Australia), which lies adjacent to the Gippsland Basin and contains sub-economic reserves of oil and gas, has shown that the Tertiary coals and not the associated shales are best correlated with the oils.
Product Type
nonGeographicDataset
eCat Id
40077
Contact for the resource
Custodian
Point of contact
Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave and Hindmarsh Dr GPO Box 378
Canberra
ACT
2601
Australia
Keywords
-
- External PublicationAbstract
- ( Theme )
-
- organic geochemistry
- Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC)
-
- Earth Sciences
-
- Published_Internal
Publication Date
2002-01-01T00:00:00
Creation Date
Security Constraints
Legal Constraints
Status
Purpose
Maintenance Information
unknown
Topic Category
geoscientificInformation
Series Information
Lineage
Unknown
Parent Information
Extents
Reference System
Spatial Resolution
Service Information
Associations
Downloads and Links
Source Information
Source data not available.