This report provides background information about the Ginninderra controlled release Experiment 3 including a description of the environmental and weather conditions during the experiment, the groundwater levels and a brief description of all the monitoring techniques that were trialled during the experiment. The Ginninderra controlled release facility is designed to simulate CO2 leakage through a fault, with CO2 released from a horizontal well 2 m underground. Two previous subsurface CO2 release experiments have been conducted at this facility in early and late 2012, which have helped guide and develop the techniques that have been applied herein. The aim of the third Ginninderra controlled release experiment was to further the development of detection and quantification techniques, and investigate seasonal effects on gas migration. Particular focus was given to plant health as a diagnostic detection method, via physical, biochemical and hyperspectral changes in plant biomass in response to elevated CO2 in the shallow root zone. Release of CO2 began 8 October 2013 at 4:45 PM and stopped 17 December 2013 at 5:35 PM. The CO2 release rate during Experiment 3 was 144 kg/d CO2. Several monitoring and assessment techniques were trialled for their effectiveness to quantify and qualify the CO2 that was released. The methods are described in this report and include: - soil gas - eddy covariance - mobile surveys - Line CO2 concentrations - groundwater levels and chemistry - plant biochemistry - airborne hyperspectral - soil flux - electromagnetic (EM-31 and EM-38) - meteorology This report is a reference guide to describe the Ginninderra Experiment 3 details. Only methods are described in this report, with the results of the experiment published in conference papers and journal articles.

A dynamic modelling study was undertaken to assess the feasibility of a planned CO2 injection experiment into a shallow fault at the CO2CRC’s Otway Research Facility. The aim was to identify key physical properties that strongly influence migration behaviour but are presently unmeasured. Two different simulators (CMG-GEM and TOUGH2) were used to model this experiment. Both simulation efforts indicate that the proposed experiment is feasible, but show the need for better data on the maximum injection pressure and the permeability distribution in the near-surface region (including the continuity of the clay layer). During the simulation with high injection rate, there could be a rapid accumulation of CO2 at the early injection stage due to the constraints of maximum injection pressure. The modelling results suggest that the dominant trapping mechanisms are likely to be free CO2 gas trapped by the upper clay layer and residual trapping. The total amount of CO2 that could be injected increased with greater injection pressure, injection rate and maximum residual gas saturation. The results suggest that dissolution of CO2 is likely to continue to increase during the injection and post-injection stages. After the CO2 injection phase, the gas was found to spread laterally within the reservoir and moved upward along the permeable grid cells at the modelled fault. A comparison between the modelling approaches suggests that if there is a desire to have CO2 migrate up the fault and reach the upper clay layer, it will be important to conduct the injection experiment at the most permeable sections of the fault and inject CO2 into a shallow high permeability layer. It is necessary to clarify whether there is an unsaturated zone beneath the clay layer as this is speculated to exist but is unknown.