This interpretation was produced as part of a study to identify possible near-surface salt-related features to support the exploration of salt features suitable for hydrogen storage in the Canning Basin region (Connors et al., 2022). The interpretation of AEM conductivity sections delineates the geo-electrical features that correspond to major chronostratigraphic boundaries. The chronostratigraphic resolution used was the delineation of the era chronostratigraphic boundaries, specifically the contact between Cenozoic, Mesozoic, Paleozoic, Neoproterozoic, Mesoproterozoic, Paleoproterozoic and Archean stratigraphic units. Non-chronostratigraphy-related interpretations were also collected, such as faults and the base of weathering. The chronostratigraphic and non-chronostratigraphic feature types (in the “TYPE” field) form the parent-level categories in the interpretations. These are the categories that were digitised during the interpretation; they are related to the geometry of each line segment, and are the symbolised categories displayed by the 3D GOCAD objects. All other (child) attributes are attached to the lines or points as ancillary data. Moreover, each interpretation line or point is attributed with interpretation-specific metadata, including geometry, chronostratigraphic relationship, geological contact type, stratigraphy, confidence, basis of interpretation, comments, new observations, interpreter’s details and interpretation date. The geometry data and pixel coordinates allow interpretations to be plotted in multidimensional spaces. Segment and vertex identifiers are provided to maintain polylines when converting between multidimensional spaces. The ground surface elevation directly above each vertex, derived from a digital elevation model acquired during AEM acquisition, is provided (in the “AEM_DEM” field). Chronostratigraphic relationships are captured by the eras of the units above and below the interpretations, which identify if the high-level chronostratigraphic order is continuous or discontinuous. This information is complemented by the contact type field, which describes if contacts are conformable, unconformable, intrusive, faulted, etc. The stratigraphic unit fields capture the stratigraphic unit names and numbers for the units above and below the interpretation (if the interpretation occurs at an era boundary) or the stratigraphic unit name and number of the unit the interpretation occurs within (if the interpretation line occurs entirely within one unit). The interpreter’s confidence levels of the interpretation placement, and for the stratigraphic units occurring in the locations in which they are interpreted, are provided. As the AEM interpretations were performed by integrating the AEM with multidisciplinary datasets, each line or point is attributed with a list of the data types that were used to support the interpretation. A comments field provides further information about the interpretation. A field that captures any new observations made during the interpretation provides insight into features that were previously unknown. The names of the interpreter and the date of the interpretation for each line or point are also provided.Interpretation of potentially newly-discovered geological faults observed in the AEM conductivity sections, and known faults from the integrated supporting information, have been included in the dataset. Where the attitudes of faults were either indiscernible in the conductivity sections or were otherwise unknown, the faults have been interpreted as vertical. This dataset also includes observations of potential salt-related features in the near-surface stratigraphy, such as interpretation of a breccia zone overlying a salt diapir, and areas of disruption to near-surface stratigraphy possibly due to salt movement and/or dissolution.In addition to the data in this data package, this interpretation is also available for visualisation on Geoscience Australia’s Portal < https://portal.ga.gov.au> and is stored in, and retrievable from, the Estimates of Geological and Geophysical Surfaces (EGGS) database, also accessible through the Portal. Despite these interpretations being collected to support the exploration of salt features for hydrogen storage, they are also intended for use in a wide range of other disciplines. The 3D geometry of the parent features attributed with large amounts of interpretation-specific metadata ensure these interpretations will be useful for mineral, energy and groundwater resource exploration, environmental management, subsurface mapping, tectonic evolution studies, and cover thickness (e.g. Bonnardot et al., 2020), prospectivity (e.g. Murr et al., 2020), and economic (e.g. Haynes et al., 2020) modelling. Therefore, these interpretations will benefit government, industry and academia interested in the geology of the Canning Basin region.