• Product catalogue
  •  
  •  
  •  

Assessment of the effects of the inclusion of poor quality sediment samples on spatial predictions of seabed sediments in the Australian marine margin

Abstract: Spatial predictions of seabed sediments based on samples in the Australian Marine Samples (MARS) database provide environmental baseline information used in the management of Australia’s marine jurisdiction, offshore resource development, and marine protected areas. The MARS database holds 14204 samples, distributed unevenly across the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone (AEEZ). As such, interpolations of seabed samples are often required for understanding target regions between collection sites. Data quality in the MARS database also varies, with data quality control resulting in the exclusion of over 7,000 samples, most of which were dredged samples. Dredged samples are thought to lower the accuracy of the spatial predictions produced from the database. In this study we examined whether these excluded dredged samples should for spatial predictions by assessing whether the dredged samples decreased or increased the accuracy of the resulting spatial predictions of seabed mud content, and whether the dredging method used altered the accuracy of the resulting prediction.


We confined our analyses to two contrasting areas in the AEEZ: the Southwest Region (407 total samples; 150 dredged) and Petrel Region (534 total samples; 297 dredged). We compared the accuracy of interpolated surfaces of mud content generated from QC’d samples with surfaces generated with samples from different dredge types (benthic, pipe, chain bag and unspecified). In the Southwest region samples included 73 benthic, 19 pipe, 41 chain bag, and 17 unspecified dredged samples. In the Petrel region samples included 46 pipe and 251 unspecified dredged samples. Spatial predictions of seabed mud content were made using Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) and Ordinary Kriging (OK). Predictive errors were assessed based on leave-one-out cross-validation in terms of relative mean absolute error (RMAE). The effects of dredged samples on the predictive error were analysed using paired Mann-Whitney tests.


For sediment samples in the Southwest region, including benthic dredge samples in the prediction reduced the accuracy of IDW by 1.79% in terms of RMAE. Including chain bag dredge samples increased the accuracy of IDW with a small difference in RMAE of 0.47%. The difference in accuracy of IDW was insignificant for the unspecified type samples, all dredged sample types and pipe dredged samples. Including samples with all-dredged type and unspecified type dredge samples improved the accuracy of the OK predictions over the QCed samples in the Southwest region with a small effect on RMAE of 0.68% for all-dredged samples and 0.65% for unspecified type dredged samples. The difference in accuracy of OK was insignificant for benthic dredged, pipe dredged and chain bag dredged samples in the Southwest region. No significant effects on the accuracy of IDW in the Petrel region were found for all the tested dredged sample types (unspecified type, pipe dredged samples, and all-dredged samples). The difference in accuracy of OK in the Petrel Region for samples with all dredged and with unspecified dredged samples was insignificant. Including pipe dredged samples increased the accuracy of OK in the Petrel with a negligible effect on RMAE of 0.02%.


In summary, the inclusion of dredged samples produced minimal effects on the accuracy of spatial predictive models. Effects were not consistent across region or dredge type, but findings showed dredged samples had surprisingly little effect on the accuracy of the predictions Including the dredged samples would require reprocessing the spatial predictions for the AEEZ based on the MARS database, so as the findings are only based mud sediment data from two regions caution should be taken to generalise these findings to other sediment types and to the entire Australian marine margin. Further testing is required to verify these findings for other regions and sediment types and identify whether future spatial predictions can include some of this extra data without a loss in accuracy.


This paper was submitted/presented at the 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2017) conference, 3-8 December 2017

Simple

Identification info

Date (Creation)
2017-06-30T15:10:00
Date (Publication)
2023-06-05T21:57:09
Citation identifier
ga-dataSetURI/https://pid.geoscience.gov.au/dataset/ga/111622

Cited responsible party
Role Organisation / Individual Name Details
Author

Dunn, B.

{1}
Author

Li, J.

{authorContactOrder}
Name

22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2017) conference 3-8 December 2017 Hobart TAS

Purpose

Paper submitted to the 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2017) conference

Status
Completed
Spatial representation type
Topic category
  • Geoscientific information

Extent

Extent

N
S
E
W


Maintenance and update frequency
Not planned

Resource format

Title

Product data repository: Various Formats

Website

Data Store directory containing the digital product files

Data Store directory containing one or more files, possibly in a variety of formats, accessible to Geoscience Australia staff only for internal purposes

Keywords
  • Spatial interpolation

Keywords
  • Inverse Distance Weighting

Keywords
  • Ordinary Kriging

Keywords
  • seabed sediment samples

Keywords
  • dredge sampling types

Keywords
  • Published_External

Resource constraints

Title

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence

Alternate title

CC-BY

Edition

4.0

Website

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/

Access constraints
License
Use constraints
License

Resource constraints

Classification
Unclassified
Language
English
Character encoding
UTF8

Distribution Information

Distributor contact
Role Organisation / Individual Name Details
Distributor

Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia)

Voice facsimile
OnLine resource

Link to Conference Page

Link to Conference Page

Distribution format
OnLine resource

Link to Paper

Link to Paper

Distribution format

Resource lineage

Statement

Paper submitted to the 22nd International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2017) conference

Hierarchy level
Document

Metadata constraints

Classification
Unclassified

Metadata

Metadata identifier
urn:uuid/cf01ffe4-8c88-435b-b9a9-5363630805cd

Title

GeoNetwork UUID

Type of resource

Resource scope
Document
Name

Journal Articles and Conference Papers

Alternative metadata reference

Title

Geoscience Australia - short identifier for metadata record with

uuid

Citation identifier
eCatId/111622

Metadata linkage

https://internal.ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/search?uuid=cf01ffe4-8c88-435b-b9a9-5363630805cd

Point-of-truth metadata URL

Metadata linkage

https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/cf01ffe4-8c88-435b-b9a9-5363630805cd

Date info (Creation)
2017-06-30T05:08:48
Date info (Revision)
2017-08-09T00:24:04

Metadata standard

Title

AU/NZS ISO 19115-1:2014

Metadata standard

Title

ISO 19115-1:2014

Metadata standard

Title

ISO 19115-3 (Draft Schemas 2015)

Edition date
2015-07-01T00:00:00
Title

Geoscience Australia Community Metadata Profile of ISO 19115-1:2014

Edition

Version 2.0, April 2015

 
 

Spatial extent

N
S
E
W


Keywords

Inverse Distance Weighting Ordinary Kriging Spatial interpolation dredge sampling types seabed sediment samples

Provided by

Access to the portal
Read here the full details and access to the data.

Associated resources

Not available


  •  
  •  
  •