Authors / CoAuthors
Siwabessy, J. | Tran, M. | Huang, Z. | Nichol, S.L. | Atkinson, I.
Abstract
This dataset contains seascape classification layer derived from bathymetry and backscatter, and their derivative from seabed mapping surveys in Darwin Harbour. The survey was undertaken during the period 24 June to 20 August 2011 by iXSurvey Australia Pty Ltd for the Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport (NRETAS) in collaboration with Geoscience Australia (GA), the Darwin Port Corporation (DPC) and the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) using GA's Kongsberg EM3002D multibeam sonar system and DPC's vessel Matthew Flinders. The survey obtained detailed bathymetric map of Darwin Harbour. Refer to the GA record ' Mapping and Classification of Darwin Harbour Seabed' for further information on processing techniques applied (GeoCat: 79212; GA Record: 2015/xx)
Product Type
dataset
eCat Id
83951
Contact for the resource
Custodian
Owner
Custodian
Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave and Hindmarsh Dr GPO Box 378
Canberra
ACT
2601
Australia
Keywords
-
- Marine Data
- ( Theme )
-
- multibeam
- ( Theme )
-
- marine survey
- ( Theme )
-
- bathymetry
- ( Theme )
-
- backscatter
- ( Theme )
-
- marine environmental baselines
-
- AU-NT
- Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC)
-
- Marine Geoscience
-
- Published_External
Publication Date
2015-01-01T00:00:00
Creation Date
Security Constraints
Legal Constraints
Status
Purpose
Maintenance Information
asNeeded
Topic Category
environment
Series Information
Lineage
Multiple spatial layers of physical data were classified using the Iterative Self Organising (ISO) Unsupervised Classification methodology available in ArcGIS (v.10). This methodology performs unsupervised classification based on a series of input raster bands using the ISO Cluster and Maximum Likelihood Classification tools. Datasets used in the derivation of the seabed habitat classification included bathymetry, slope, rugosity, backscatter and p rock. Statistically, there are an optimum number of classes into which the data can be partitioned that minimises uncertainty. The method we used is called the Distance Ratio method. Classifications were carried out for 2 to 9 classes, with the distance ratio estimated for each class. The distance ratio is the ratio of the average of the mean distance of each class member from its class mean to the overall average distance of each member from the overall mean. This value provides an indication of how well the data matches the assigned classification. The optimal number of classes occurs where the distance ratio has a local minimum, indicating that the addition of more classes will not improve the classification accuracy as much as the addition of previous classes. Choosing fewer classes will not explain the variation in the classes as thoroughly.
Parent Information
Extents
[-12.59, -12.32, 130.69, 130.94]
Reference System
Spatial Resolution
Service Information
Associations
Source Information
Legacy product, source data not available. 130.69 130.94 -12.59 -12.32