Authors / CoAuthors
Drummond, B.J. | Hobbs, R.W. | Goleby, B.R.
Abstract
Crustal-scale seismic surveys mostly collect data along single profiles, and the data processing has an underlying assumption that the data have imaged 2D structure striking at right angles to the seismic profile. However even small amounts of out-of-plane topography on a reflector can result in reflections that do not map the reflector shape accurately. Out of plane energy will migrate within the plane of the section to an apparent depth (represented as two-way-time TWT) that is greater than the depth of the reflection point out of the plane of the section. It will fall within the plane of the section at depths less than, equal to or greater than the intersection of the reflector with the plane of the section, depending on the amount of topographic relief on the reflector out of the plane of the section, and the offset of the topographic relief from the plane of the section. Reflectors that are a single surface can therefore be manifested in the seismic section as a band of several reflections, rather than a single reflection. The top of the band of reflections may not represent the position of the reflector in the plane of the section. More complex reflectors that have a finite thickness because they are made up of several to many anastomosing reflectors caused by altered and anisotropic rock embedded in protolith, will appear as laterally short reflections within a laterally continuous reflection band. Examples of such reflectors would be shear zones, the Moho in some places, and rock with compositional layering. With increasing topographic relief, the top of the reflection band for both single- and multi-layer reflectors will be a poor indicator of the top of the reflector in the Earth. The bottom of the reflection band will always be a poor indicator of the bottom of the reflector. Because out-of-plane energy can arrive at TWTs that are different from those of the reflector in the plane of the section, out-of-plane energy has the potential to interfere constructively or destructively with the in-plane energy. In synthetic data calculated for a simple model assuming one layer and topographic relief of 250m over wavelengths of 4-5 km, similar to that imaged in a real sub-horizontal detachment, amplitudes ranged up to 2.6 times the expected amplitude for the layer. A model with anastomosing layers built to resemble a thick shear zone rather than a discrete fault surface allowed tuning between layers. The effects of out-of-plane energy when combined with the effects of tuning caused amplitudes up to 3.1 times those expected. Larger amplitudes could be achieved if model was contrived. The results indicate that care must be taken when calculating impedance contrasts using real data. The highest amplitude reflections are likely to yield overestimates the true impedance contrast.
Product Type
nonGeographicDataset
eCat Id
50466
Contact for the resource
Custodian
Point of contact
Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave and Hindmarsh Dr GPO Box 378
Canberra
ACT
2601
Australia
Keywords
-
- External PublicationScientific Journal Paper
- ( Theme )
-
- seismics
- ( Theme )
-
- seismology
- Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC)
-
- Earth Sciences
-
- Published_Internal
Publication Date
2003-08-04T00:00:00
Creation Date
Security Constraints
Legal Constraints
Status
Purpose
Maintenance Information
unknown
Topic Category
geoscientificInformation
Series Information
Lineage
Unknown
Parent Information
Extents
Reference System
Spatial Resolution
Service Information
Associations
Downloads and Links
Source Information
Source data not available.