Authors / CoAuthors
de Caritat, P. | Woods, B. | Simpson, T. | Nichols, C. | Hoogenboom, L. | Ilheo, A. | Aberle, M.G. | Hoogewerff, J.
Abstract
Compositional data from a soil survey over north Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, are used to develop and test an empirical soil provenancing method. Mineralogical data from Fourier Transform InfraRed spectroscopy (FTIR) and Magnetic Susceptibility (MS), and geochemical data from X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF; for total major oxides) and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS; for both total and aqua regia-soluble trace elements), are performed on the survey’s 268 topsoil samples (0-5 cm depth; 1 sample per km2). Principal components (PCs) are calculated after imputation of censored data and centred logratio transformation. The sequential provenancing approach is underpinned by (i) the preparation of interpolated raster grids of the soil properties (including PCs); (ii) the explicit quantification and propagation of uncertainty; (iii) the intersection of the soil property rasters with the values of the evidentiary sample (± uncertainty); and (iv) the computation of cumulative provenance rasters (‘heat maps’) for the various analytical techniques. The sequential provenancing method is tested in the north Canberra soil survey with three ‘blind’ samples representing simulated evidentiary samples. Performance metrics of precision and accuracy indicate that the FTIR and MS (mineralogy), as well as XRF and total ICP-MS (geochemistry) analytical methods offer the most precise and accurate provenance predictions. Inclusions of PCs in provenancing adds marginally to the performance. Maximising the number of analytes/analytical techniques is advantageous in soil provenancing. Despite acknowledged limitations and gaps, it is concluded that the empirical soil provenancing approach can play an important role in forensic and intelligence applications. <b>Citation:</b> de Caritat, P., Woods, B., Simpson, T., Nichols, C., Hoogenboom, L., Ilheo, A., Aberle, M.G. and Hoogewerff, J. (2021), Forensic soil provenancing in an urban/suburban setting: A sequential multivariate approach. <i>J Forensic Sci</i>, 66: 1679-1696. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14727
Product Type
document
eCat Id
144564
Contact for the resource
Point of contact
Cnr Jerrabomberra Ave and Hindmarsh Dr GPO Box 378
Canberra
ACT
2601
Australia
Resource provider
Point of contact
- Contact instructions
- MEG
Keywords
- theme.ANZRC Fields of Research.rdf
-
- EARTH SCIENCES
-
- Soil forensics
-
- soil properties
-
- compositional data analysis - CODA
-
- geochemical mapping
-
- interpolation
-
- Geographic Information System - GIS
-
- uncertainty
-
- Published_External
Publication Date
2023-10-26T23:32:06
Creation Date
Security Constraints
Legal Constraints
Status
completed
Purpose
Article for submission to the Journal of Forensic Sciences
Maintenance Information
asNeeded
Topic Category
geoscientificInformation
Series Information
Journal of Forensic Sciences Volume 66, Issue 5, September 2021 1679-1696
Lineage
Article for submission to the Journal of Forensic Sciences
Parent Information
Extents
[-35.70, -35.10, 148.80, 149.50]
Reference System
Spatial Resolution
Service Information
Associations
Source Information