Seismic Site Classification and Earthquake Hazard in the Sydney Region - Final Report  

Authors / CoAuthors

McPherson, A.A. | Burbidge, D.R. | Clark, D.J.

Abstract

Geoscience Australia (GA) was engaged by Sydney Water Corporation (SW) to review existing geological, geophysical and geotechnical data from the Sydney region in an effort to better understand seismic hazard in SW's area of operations. The main motivation is that this information can be used to improve SW's understanding of the level of earthquake risk to their infrastructure in order to support their asset management practices. Of particular interest is improving SW's understanding of asset damage or loss and potential network disruption following a large earthquake. One of the main factors influencing earthquake hazard in the Sydney Water area of operations is the likelihood of a large earthquake to the west of Sydney on what is known as the Lapstone Structural Complex. Research conducted by Geoscience Australia suggests that large earthquakes in the Lapstone Structural Complex are extremely rare (i.e. they may only happen once every few million years). This means that the area probably does not contribute as much to the seismic hazard in Sydney as has been previously thought. An equally important factor is the response of near-surface geological materials to earthquake shaking. Two seismic site classification maps for the Sydney region have been developed here to characterise materials in terms of their potential response. One uses the modified United States National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) classification scheme, while the other uses the Australian Earthquake Loading Standard (AS1170.4-2007) classification scheme. Assessment and validation of the classifications against independently acquired data from sub-surface investigations in the region suggest that both classifications provide a satisfactory representation of the distribution of materials and their potential to amplify earthquake energy. The exception to this outcome is the area underlain by the Botany Basin, where geophysical investigations and drilling data have identified the thicker basin fill sediments as having the potential to effectively increase earthquake hazard. The aforementioned AS1170.4 site classification was used to generate Australian Standard (AS1170.4-2007) earthquake hazard maps covering SW's area of operations. The analyses were completed for three spectral periods (0 s, 0.2 s and 1.0 s) and two return periods (500 years and 800 years). Results show that earthquake shaking at 0.2 s spectral period produced the highest hazard at both return periods. Overall, areas characterised by the presence of unconsolidated Cenozoic sedimentary units exhibited the highest earthquake hazard under all conditions. The modified NEHRP site classification outputs were used to produce a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the SW area of operations, using the same spectral periods and return periods. Comparison of the AS1170.4-2007 and EQRM outputs reveal several key findings. Firstly, the use of the modified NEHRP site classification scheme better differentiates the properties of geological materials, and therefore the seismic hazard, across the SW area of operations. Secondly, the probabilistic seismic hazard assessment produced values that were up to 6 times lower than those generated using the Australian Standard methodology. Lastly, regardless of the site classification schema or hazard methodology employed, areas characterised by relatively unconsolidated Cenozoic (predominantly Quaternary) sedimentary deposits always represented the highest levels of earthquake hazard.

Product Type

document

eCat Id

70569

Contact for the resource

Keywords

• GA PublicationProfessional Opinion

( Theme )

• earthquakes

( Theme )

• geohazards

( Theme )

• regolith

• AU-NSW

Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC)

• Earth Sciences

• Published_Internal

Publication Date

2010-01-01T00:00:00

Creation Date

Security Constraints

Australian Government Security ClassificationSystem    

Classification - unclassified

Legal Constraints

Special, MOU, etc.

Access - restricted

Use - license

Status

Purpose

Maintenance Information

unknown

Topic Category

geoscientificInformation

Series Information

Professional Opinion 2010/006

Lineage

Unknown

Parent Information

Extents

Reference System

Spatial Resolution

Service Information

Associations

Downloads and Links

Source Information

Source data not available.